--- language: - en license: cc-by-nc-4.0 size_categories: - 10M [Paper][Code]

## Dataset Description ### Dataset Summary DLT-Tweets is a large-scale corpus of social media posts related to Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT). This dataset is part of the larger DLT-Corpus collection, designed to support NLP research, social computing studies, and public discourse analysis in the DLT domain. It was introduced in the paper [DLT-Corpus: A Large-Scale Text Collection for the Distributed Ledger Technology Domain](https://huggingface.co/papers/2602.22045). The dataset contains **22.03 million social media documents** with **1,120 million tokens** (1.12 billion tokens), spanning posts from **2013 to mid-2023**. All documents are in English and have been processed to protect user privacy. This dataset is part of the DLT-Corpus collection. For the complete corpus including scientific literature and patent data, see: https://huggingface.co/collections/ExponentialScience/dlt-corpus-68e44e40d4e7a3bd7a224402 ### Languages English (en) ## Dataset Structure ### Data Fields Each post in the dataset contains the following fields: - **tweet**: Full text content of the social media post - **timestamp**: Date and time when the post was created - **year**: Year the post was created - **language**: Language code (all entries are 'en' for English) - **total_tokens**: Total number of tokens in the tweet - **sentiment_class**: Classified sentiment category (e.g., positive, negative, neutral) - **sentiment_label**: Detailed sentiment label - **sentiment_score**: Numerical sentiment score - **confidence_level**: Confidence level of the sentiment classification **Privacy Protection:** All usernames have been removed from the tweet text to protect user privacy. ### Data Splits This is a single corpus without predefined splits. Users should create their own train/validation/test splits based on their specific research needs. Consider temporal splits for time-series analyses or studying how discourse evolves over time. ## Dataset Creation ### Curation Rationale DLT-Tweets was created to address the lack of large-scale social media corpora for studying public discourse, sentiment, and information diffusion in the Distributed Ledger Technology domain. Social media data provides unique insights into: - Public perception and sentiment toward DLT technologies - Real-time reactions to DLT events (market movements, hacks, regulations) - Information spreading patterns and viral content - Community dynamics and influencer networks - The gap between technical development and public understanding ### Source Data #### Data Collection Social media posts were aggregated from: 1. **Previously published academic datasets** focused on cryptocurrency and blockchain topics 2. **Publicly available industry sources** that collected DLT-related social media data All data was collected **before Twitter/X's 2023 API restrictions** that limited academic research access. The collection complies with platform Terms of Service that were in effect at the time of collection, which explicitly permitted academic research use. #### Data Processing The collection process involved: 1. **Aggregation**: Combining multiple sources while tracking provenance 2. **Username removal**: Removing all @username mentions to protect privacy 3. **Duplicate detection**: Identifying and removing duplicate posts 4. **Language filtering**: Filtering for English-language posts using language detection 5. **Sentiment analysis**: Adding sentiment labels using automated classification 6. **Quality filtering**: Removing extremely short posts 7. **Privacy protection**: Ensuring no identifying information remains ### Annotations The dataset includes automated sentiment annotations generated using sentiment analysis models. These provide: - Sentiment class (positive, negative, neutral) - Sentiment scores and confidence levels #### Annotation Process Sentiment was determined using automated sentiment analysis models trained on social media text. ### Personal and Sensitive Information **Privacy Measures:** - **All usernames have been removed** from the text content - No profile information, user IDs, or biographical data is included - Only the text content and basic engagement metrics are retained - Posts are not linkable back to specific individuals **Residual Considerations:** - Some posts may contain self-disclosed information in the text itself - Famous individuals or organizations might be identifiable through context - Users should not attempt to re-identify individuals from this dataset ## Considerations for Using the Data ### Social Impact of Dataset This dataset can enable: - **Positive impacts**: Understanding public discourse, detecting misinformation, studying information diffusion, analyzing sentiment trends, improving public communication about DLT - **Potential negative impacts**: Could be misused for market manipulation, creating targeted misinformation campaigns, or developing manipulative trading systems **Researchers should implement appropriate safeguards when working with this data.** ### Discussion of Biases Potential biases include: - **Platform bias**: Only Twitter/X data is included; other social platforms are not represented - **User bias**: Social media users are not representative of the general population - **Language bias**: Only English-language posts are included - **Temporal bias**: More recent years have more posts due to platform growth and increased DLT interest - **Topic bias**: Certain events (market crashes, hacks) may generate disproportionate discussion - **Bot bias**: Despite filtering, some bot-generated content may remain - **Geographic bias**: English-speaking regions are over-represented ### Other Known Limitations - **Temporal gap**: No posts after mid-2023 due to platform API restrictions - **Context loss**: Username removal eliminates ability to analyze user behavior or influence - **Incomplete threads**: Some conversation threads may be incomplete due to filtering - **Sarcasm and irony**: Social media posts often use language that is difficult for NLP models to interpret - **Misinformation**: Dataset may contain false or misleading claims about DLT - **Market sensitivity**: Discussions may reflect market manipulation or coordinated campaigns - **Evolving terminology**: DLT terminology evolves rapidly; older posts may use outdated terms ## Additional Information ### Dataset Curators Walter Hernandez Cruz, Peter Devine, Nikhil Vadgama, Paolo Tasca, Jiahua Xu ### Licensing Information **CC-BY-NC 4.0** (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International) This dataset is released under CC-BY-NC 4.0 for **research purposes only**. **Key terms:** - **Attribution required**: You must give appropriate credit to the dataset creators - **Non-commercial use**: Commercial use is not permitted under this license - **Academic research**: The dataset is intended for academic and non-profit research **Legal basis:** Data was collected before changes in Twitter/X's Terms of Service in 2023, under terms that explicitly permitted academic research use. See: - https://x.com/en/tos/previous/version_18 - https://x.com/en/tos/previous/version_17 For more information on CC-BY-NC 4.0, see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ ### Citation Information ```bibtex @misc{hernandez2026dlt-corpus, title={DLT-Corpus: A Large-Scale Text Collection for the Distributed Ledger Technology Domain}, author={Walter Hernandez Cruz and Peter Devine and Nikhil Vadgama and Paolo Tasca and Jiahua Xu}, year={2026}, eprint={2602.22045}, archivePrefix={arXiv}, primaryClass={cs.CL}, url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.22045}, } ```