"
In response to User Hoary's topic The term ""Ebonics"" and the appearance of a legal threat

Ernie Smith writes

I maintain that those who view and use the word Ebonics as being a synonym for BE, AAVE and other English language based appellations, are either totally ignorant of the origin and true meaning of the word Ebonics or they are fully aware of the origin and true meaning of the word Ebonics and elect to use word Ebonics as a synonym for BE, AAVE and other English language based appellations, with the intent to deceive. Since by definition to counterfeit is to: “try to deceive by pretense or dissembling.” the propagation of a false definition of the word ‘Ebonics’ as being a synonym for BE, AAVE other English language based appellations, with the intent to deceive, is larcenous counterfeiting. Given that by definition ""to steal and pass off the ideas or words of another as one’s own"" and using a ""created production without crediting the source"" is plagiarism or literary theft, when use is made of the word Ebonics (an original idea and word coined by Dr. Robert Williams as a synonym for BE, AAVE and other English language based appellations, this deceptive pattern of practice is ‘plagiaristic’ dishonesty or ‘literary theft’ that violates national and international laws protecting ‘intellectual property’ rights. This kind of plagiarism or stealth of ‘intellectual property’ via literary theft and the intentional perversion of the truth should not be tolerated and the authors of articles and books as well as publishers of dictionaries including Wikipedia, progating counterfeit and plagiaristic definitions of the word Ebonics must be held accountable.

Kifano S., Smith E. A, (2005) Ebonics and Education in Context of Culture: Meeting Language and Cultural Needs of LEP African American Children  Edited by J. Ramirez et. al. Buffalo Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Smith E. A. (1974) The Evolution and Continuing Presence of the African Oral Tradition In Black Ameica. Irvine. University of California at Irvine
Smith E.A. (1976) A Case for Bilingual and Bicultural Education for United States Slave Descendants of African Origin  Department of Linguistics Seminar Papers Series No 39 Edited By A. Kaye and D. Sears California State University  Fullerton, Fullerton
Smith E.A. (1978) Historical Development of Ebonics In The Western Journal of Black Studies. Pullman Washington State University Press
 Smith E.A. (1993) Black Child In the Schools: Ebonics and its Implications for the Transformation of American Education  In Bicultural Education Studies In Education Edited by A. Darder, Claremont, Claremont Graduate School
Smith E. A., Crozier K. (1998) Ebonics Is Not Black English In The Western Journal of Black Studies. Pullman Washington State University Press
Smith E.A. (1993) Cultural and Linguistic Factors in Worker Notification to Blue Collar and No-Collar African American Workers  In American Journal of Industrial Medicine Edited by Philip J. Landrigan, Irving J. Seliokoff et. al.  New York.  Wiley-Liss
Smith E.A (2001) Ebonics and Bilingual Education of the African American Child In Ebonics and Language Education of African Ancestry Students Edited by Clinton Crawford Brooklyn Sankofa World Publishers"


"

 Making the majority into the minority
""Though there has not been a claim of responsibility, previous bombings in Lahore have been blamed on the Pakistani Taliban because of their disagreement with minority interpretations of Islam, such as Sufism.[5]""

I would like to know when the Barelvis became a minority in Pakistan. It is the largest sect in Pakistan. Even the outdated CIA fact book can verify this. It seems that alJazera does not know what they are talking about. If anyone have a doubt about the connection between Barelvis and sufis, then simply read an article about Barelvis(which is insufficient and at parts incorrect - like many other articles here). They are sufis or they have a sufi master to whom they belong(speaking on the individual level). Personally I can tell you that for a Barelvi, sufis are considered our elderly; our wise sages who we seek for enlightenment and religious knowledge. Barelvi == Sufi more or less(to simplify things for the reader). People need to stop selling their propaganda and belittling the sufis. Barelvis usually call themselves ahle sunnah wal'jamat(this would be the international representative name barelvis refer themselves as - unlike in Pakistan and India due to complexities arising due to impostors). This is the largest sect in the Islamic world(no quotation - simply based on experience and personal research); where sufis are considered as mentioned, our elderly, our sages, our spiritual guides. Hence sufi's are not some sect, but simply our respectable elderly. The sect is called Ahle Sunnah wal'Jamat. An ok translation would be ""The people of the Sunnah"". Unlike Christianity, the right to claim of the true sect is of utmost importance for muslims due to Hadith of the Prophet Muhammad s.a.w mentioning of the divide among us and that only one sect would be the truly guided one - which shall happen to be the largest one(from the hadith). Again seek out the source if you are interested. Its in the major Hadith collections. Hence quantity is an important question when it comes to pinpointing any discrepancy in this regard. Strictly speaking from an encyclopedic perspective, how can it be considered acceptable to disregard quantity ? If anyone doubts that most Pakistanis are sufis/barelvis/ahle sunnat wal'jamat. Then simply take a look at Sindh. I don't have the exact number, but its like 90-95 % sufis. Its only in NWFP that the majority are Wahabis. But that corresponds to ca. less than 10%(there are shia as well in NWFP and some other sects) of the total population in Pakistan(census 2010). How difficult is it for people to at least conduct their own research and try to separate truth from fallacy ?"


Wakefield Trinity Wildcats Golden Greats 1945-1991
Good work on the 'Wakefield Trinity Wildcats Golden Greats 1945-1991' navigational box, where did you manage to find the information? Best Reagrds.


Gilliam, please unblock me. My stupid sister is always using my computer and I don't know what she does.


You didn't produce a counterargument during the discussion. Instead, opportunistically, you waited a month to reimpose a change you knew to be contentious, and did so on a false pretenses, by falsely claiming a non-existing consensus here to do so. Once again, you're sending bullying messages against me instead of arguing the merits of the case by presenting an actual counterargument. 61.68.175.113


If you ain't sucking dick, why you sitting there with puckered lips? That's collagen, muhfuckin bitch


":Following the initial Jeremiah Wright controversy, a consensus version of the events was worked out. It was an extremely unpleasant and tortuous experience that involved neutral and ""pro-Obama"" editors bending over backwards to accommodate 3 anti-Obama editors who wanted to make a as big a deal as possible out of Wright's ravings. The ""negotiation"" took weeks to accomplish, even with the timely assistance of an impartial and thoughtful administrator. Kossack is trying to restore this particular version, but he has embellished it with provocative sub-headings, and enhanced it by conflating it with Ayers-related BS. What he fails to understand is that the Wright controversy has now passed into history, and is no longer significant. It had no overall effect on the primaries, and Republican attempts to use it in a recent special election backfired. Therefore, an abbreviated summary is all that is now needed, and curious historians can read all the gory details in the exhaustive sub article and the related biography - as I mentioned earlier.

"


I left some notes on the talk page. I have also been drafting another organization that would help here too... Let me pull out my notes and see what I can do to at least get it moving again.


that was for Tsourkpk unless u have 2 accounts here in Wikipedia,that kinda prove it.By the way 'Arvanite
 and u have a Greek nickname??? My family is from Gjirokastra,never saw a Arvanite with a Greek nickname!hmmm


Lol 1 dimensional. Stupid redneck.


"

But note the essential feature:  A debtor can force the acceptance of ""legal tender"" to discharge his debt ONLY if the debt is denominated in the SAME currency as the ""legal tender"" money is!  To repeat myself AGAIN:  If you owe me onions (and you could owe me onions!) then I can insist on repayment in onions.

All that legal tender is, is the ascribing to certain examples (coins, notes) of a particular money a special status.  There is nothing to prevent two different monies being in circulation and each of them having coins & notes which are legal tender.  That this is not common does not mean the contrary.   "


I did not make any changes to an article about toupees, and this is not a public computer. *********


Ahontoay
Deleting my page Ahontoay was not necessary. I read the reason for the page's deletion and the following may help you learn more information about this group of non treaty Montana Chippewa Indians. You claimed you searched for anything about Ahontoay on wikipedia. You can try searching by using the name Ahonteways but it won't work. Search by using the phrase User:Linniebc/SandBox. That will quickly lead you to the wikipedia page with A-Hon-Te-Ways. Though the phrase is a wikipedia's contributor's name, it is the only way you'll find it. That is the only wikipedia page with that name. The Ahontoay are a non federally recognized group of Chippewa's in Montana. The United States has no jurisdiction over them.

The only way to find out about this group of non treaty Chippewa's, is by using google or another search engine. Google Ahontoay and you will find that the name is spelt as Ahontoay. The wikipedia page spells it as Ahonteways, which is not the correct way of spelling the chiefs name on the historical records i have found on the internet. Don't get the two names Ahontoay and Ahonteways, mixed up. They are not two different peoples but the same people. Chief Ahontoay did not take treaty. He never lived on a Reservation which proves he refused to cooperate with the United States. You will have to deal with the obvious difference in name spelling. It is not right to delete my page because it is not a hoax. It is based on real historical events.

I will complain to your superior if you refuse to return my page. My page is not a hoax. I have spent a great deal of time on the internet conspiracy searching for all kinds of information, and to have someone as you intrude, makes it all the more worse. Your actions were not necessary. I will include racism if you do not return my page.


I guess people aren't sick of cultural marxism yet.
The one thing governemnt is scared of is United people who don't buy this media crap. White privilege, BLM , hatred of Muslims, etc it's all cultural marxism. While everyone's discussing  how white people need to be weak, how certain lives are supposed to matter more,and how the world is supposed to be scared of Muslims-governments gets to take everyone's freedoms away.


Left you a message here. []


Will Hillary ‘dodo-bird’ Be Dems 2016 Candidate To Take Over Obama's Job As US Prez? DoG http://t.co/wFlZyXmVk6 via @worldnetdaily


RT @pound_Mytweets: "@wheeler_kashhh: http://t.co/PtQA8LZqEA" 😍😍😍 we gave bitches something to be mad about . !


Deleted again  please read WP:NFT.


Further update: I've now discovered that the CPC-ML wasn't re-registered with Elections Canada until *late* 1993, by which time the CPR had already been floated (and, seemingly, rejected).

Perhaps (a third option) the CPR was planned as a front organization for the CPC-ML, and the idea wasn't rejected until some candidates were already registered with Elections Canada as representatives of the new party.

Penetrating the mind of Hardial Bains is quite difficult ...  04:50, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)


This user is a fucking douche bag


"

Gender equality is one of this project's central concepts. It was AWOL.
(reposted from Portal_talk:Feminism)

Essentially, variations on Gender equality had been hijacked six or so months ago by redirects to both Zygarchy and Equalism, and had actually begun to affect the conversation across the internet.

This is bad news, as these terms have nothing behind them but ill-defined assertions. I've rarely been embarrassed for Wikipedia, but this is one of those moments where the site's power was left in the hands of POV/OR mischief-makers.

""Zygarchy"" is a made-up word that would never meet the WP:NEO standard if anyone had caught it. It has never meant ""rule of two genders"" before someone asserted it on Wikipedia. There are a couple hundred blogs out there crowing about the ""new word they'd learned"" while learning less than zero about notable, verifiable internationally-established gender policy. (Somewhat ominously, ""zygarchy"" is an obscure but genuine term for an ancient military formation involving two chariots. I think the chariots were used to run infantry over... or to cut them down with a chain between them...)

""Equalism"" has been used by notable sources and scholars but never consistently. There was some effort to use it to refer to communism in the fifties, anarchism at various points, and some among the Facebook crowd seem to like it better than ""feminism""; one news citation in Sweden counts it as a subset of feminism. That is to say, it's a semantic game: There is no ""-ism"" there, just a desire for one, a moving target without a developed philosophy behind it. I've redirected it to a far more notable article, Egalitarianism.

Nearly every instance of a wikilink to Gender equality had been piped to Equalism. That's what last night was all about for me: finding and removing the plumbing from this phantasm.

I've reestablished the Gender equality article with cites to the UN and an external link to the World Bank. I've added it to the various gender studies and feminism templates. This is one of this project's central concepts, and we really have to watch these pages. Cheers,  ✉ "


Oh, I forgot to mention, you have made yourself a very powerful enemy kid.


Did they finally cut that retard Artem Lobov?


May Lucifer's love be with you, Lift-off. Beep beep beep


frankly errant, you're a bit of a dick. ban me from Wikipedia or whatever for saying that, I don't care.


"I agree that different types of irrigation are best practiced for different applications. For example, sub surface drip for row crops and center pivot for field crop. However, there is so much ""crossover"" that it would be tough to fully delineate which specific type of irrigation is most often used for which type of crop. Furthermore, to suggest one type of irrigation modality for an application will undoubtedly lead to argument from the manufacturers watching this entry.
Tom Kruer

"


@a Gab keeps going down today. We are under attack.   If Deep State or Big Pedo Tech takes Gab down completely, I want court action. It's an attack on our rights & freedoms. It is persecution of people who won't shut up & obey the psycho order.   No consistency here. Twitter is allowed to be a haven for pedos & Leftists inciting violence, assassinations etc.


RT @OfficiallyIce: "That's why you're so good at this game. Cause u sit on your unemployed nigger ass playing all day."


WLU

Wow. How rude. So that's it? WLU comes in and doesn't care to wait for the discussion to evolve. He makes the decision to do what he wants, make the edits his friends want, and doesn't care about consensus and our progress? Why do we have the process if he doesn't respect it? He doesn't even care enough to read the arguments. Our discussion was not too long and verbose. They hit on the points that mattered most and nothing more. Is it over? WLU is not a new person to this issue and is not a third party. How do we alert other admins of his reckless actions? I am lost on the BRD chart. Is there another page that shows us the next step?


Hmm, I must say I find you suggestions quite perplexing. You say that Technocrats are attempting to push they're political ideas, but if you know anything about Technocracy you will know that it is avowedly A-political or Anti-political, so I don't know where you get that idea from. As for your argument that the article shouldn't talk about Technocracy's ideas and goals, etc. well I find that a bizarre suggestion. I mean, every article on Wiki about a specific group would be expected to have info on the ideas, goals and beliefs of that group. That would be like saying that the article on say, the Republican Party (United States) (or any other group we care to mention), shouldn't have any info on what that group advocates. Obviously it should have as much info as possible, the only thing that matters is that it is presented in an accurate and neutral way.
Eh, you said there existed entries on Technocracy in some encyclopaedias, can I ask which ones? As for using them as sources, I don't think we're actually meant to use one encyclopaedia to write another, as that would be getting the info second or third had, and the other encyclopaedias must have eventually derived their knowledge of Technocracy from the movement itself and it's literature, so I see no reason not to simply present that info first had. Besides, I've not seen any online encyclopaedias that have better information about Technocracy than this article, I believe I've seen brief overviews, but nothing of any great detail (of-course if you know of any articles that have potentially useful info, then go ahead and present it). BTW you are correct about Skip, that's what I've been trying to say all along.
Anyway I'm going to bed now, so the protection should be gone by the time I come back and then hopeful, we can get this article back on track.


I already answered you: your material was clearly a subset of the previous one, that's why I re-deleted it. You can find your work at


"

Etiquette
Your statement ""I keep my conviction that I'm on the truth: that you two are members of some racist organization"" on this edit directed toward User:Dark Tichondrias  is an accusation that two users are racists, making it against Wikipedia's policy on etiquette.  Wikipedia's policy on etiquette suggests to not accuse other users of being racist.
WP:Wikiettiquete says:
Terms like ""racist,"" ""sexist"" or even ""poorly written"" make people defensive. This makes it hard to discuss articles productively. If you have to criticize, you must do it in a polite and constructive manner.
This seems to be the issue of dispute. Yet racism is at the heart of this discussion, specially because DT and Thulean are percieved by all the rest as people with such an agenda.
I'm pondering to start a project called WP:Honesty: Say things clear (without falling in insults), don't hide in word games, don't make threats that make no sense (bravados), don't edit capriciously ignoring the discussion, etc. Play fair and demand others to do the same.
You pretend that I'm making ad hominem attacks, yet I'm just pointing out who's misbehaving and why. Something that is obvious to all, including you two.
If you would be even minimally sincere you would not be trying to corner me against arbitrarily selected Wikipolicies but you would have protested your innocence, first of all. You are just playing legalism.
If you want me to refrain from denouncing your behaviour and your agenda the least your could do is to  is to protest your innocence, to explain your reasons, to pretend at least that you are not racist. But you only make attacks ad hominem against my honesty and sincerity.
Keep it that way. I don't mind.

Personal Attacks

Please refrain from personal attacks which you made in Talk:White_people. Or next time you will be reported to WP:DP.
I am not making any personal attacks. I honestly think you are a nazi (or close equivalent, if you want to dwell in the small letter and word twists). You haven't even bothered in denying it, so why should I think otherwise.
If you think that stating that is a personal attack, please say why. I don't think that openly declaring the (apparent) truth is any personal attack but just that: stating facts, so we can discuss honestly.
What is being discussed in that article's talk page is largely ideological and some people of certain ideology (you and DarkTichondrias) are trying to manipulate the participative process of Wikipedia in your favor, editing ignoring the consensus. I honestly believe it is my duty to fight such behaviour and defend the neutrality of Wikipedia. And I will do it.
If you still arent satisfied, you can ask a request for investigation, but I must warn it can well backfire.

Of course I wont dignify your silly personal attacks with a response. And you repeated your personal attack with your response. I'll be reporting you.
Excellent.

Calling another editor a nazi, regardless of whether you think it is true, is completely unacceptable.  If you continue, you may be blocked for personal attacks.  Please find a more civil way to discuss your concerns about the article.  babelfish

Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you.
Stop being hyporcitic and stop spamming my talk page Thulean. I have enough with what Shell Kinney said.

Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you.  By saying things like ""Nevertheless I will keep protecting the article against unilateral harassment by Thu


She wrote this herself
How would a source know she has a 'good start' on a language and why would any source mention that?  She wrote this herself.  It reads like website self-biograhpy.


just found out @IUBloomington has an #Australian president! #hoosiers are my team #hoosierstate #indiana #iu #iubb #big10 20-2 tonight!


I found your arm in that trash receptacle and your leg in the mud down by that stream.You should consider keeping better track of your limbs


I beg to differ on that lip bittin shit. Dis bitch bit my lip nd tried to suck my blood. Aint shit sexy about that


Is it just me or do you people get more retarded by the day ?


User: Zoolander HHH, you have been cleared of charges and you are now able to edit pages again


Sadiq Khan is a paki twat


That's because you're a fucking FAGGOT COMMUNIST BOLSHEVIK PIECE OF SHIT.


, PA
| Mitch Fraas

|-
|
| Library Company of Philadelphia Cassatt House 1320 Locust Street Philadelphia, PA
| Nicole Scalessa

|-
|  (7:00 p.m. close)
| Temple University The Samuel Paley Library, Ground floor 1210 Polett Walk Philadelphia, PA
| Matt Shoemaker

|-
|
| Chemical Heritage Foundation 315 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, PA See Directions.
| Mary Mark Ockerbloom
|}


Possibly unfree Image:Bk-km_male.JPG
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bk-km_male.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  talk


stop it  please with your sand nigger we was joosensheeit


But with what quality of life? What will they have to trade off for both longer life and less pain? They may not be able to function in the right frame of mind. That is also wishful thinking and doesn't address the issue which is currently happening.


RT @osoplain: Soup is so much better when you have enough crackers to crumble in it to make it into a casserole


RT @MvckFadden: Treat good girls like a queen and treat hoes like garbage


@kathleenparker of the washington post to call the President ignorant I ask you racist ,angry ,bitter, bitch look in the mirror!!!!!!!!!!!


Hi, Scottywong, I already said on Boing's page, I am making an arbitration request. Before i could do it, Qwyrxian asked for a user block (Qwyrxian again!!). Now I find I cannot request for arbitration. I request an unblock only on arbitration page so i can go ahead and file a report there. Qwyrxian's contention that Hari7478 and i did not resume discussion on talk page makes no sense. It seems apparent Qwyrxian neither read content on the Iyengar talk page nor the ANI complaint (though had requested Qwyrxian to read before asking me to paste the same stuff all over again). The tactic appears to be like this  allow Hari7478 to evade answering, then ask me to paste the same stuff on talk page all over again until i give up. And sadly, no admin wants to take a call on the content or check the sources despite typing out the full page of each source misquoted by Hari7478. In such case, there is not choice but to apply for arbitration. So please allow for arbitration. Thanks.  Mayasutra


"==Notability of Michael Fout==
 A tag has been placed on Michael Fout requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.    "


"

 Unclear statements

The article is peppered with statements such as ""Rodents make up ... over 40 percent of mammalian species"", ""There are around 20 extant species"", ""Bat species account for about 20% of all mammals"", ""The carnivores include over 260 species"" etc. etc., where it is unclear, in this context, whether the statistics apply to mammals found in the US or mammals generally. I flagged a couple inline, but really someone needs to go through the whole article clarifying these. 81.152.168.164  ."


Southall in West London is dominated by a variety of Indian cuisines (in the strict sense) because the locals are Hindus from areas of India.


June 24th, his 2007 talent-laden team continues to underachieve at 36-37 and remains far out of the division race.


Ex-Methodist in Goldstone Villas, Hove, now Europa House (see Enc H&P;)
Ex-Methodist in Franklin Road, Portslade (see Enc H&P;)
Ex-Methodist in Old Shoreham Road/Montefiore Road (see Enc H&P;) (near the mosque!)
Ex-Methodist in Queens Park Road, Brighton
City Coast Church in Portslade (North Street)
Other ex-Methodists; see Enc H


"

I have searched for the quote in Clark's biography but couldn't find it.  Do you recall the page?  (It doesn't change my mind, but I am curious to read it nonetheless.)

Here's another way of looking at this issue: In addition to being a physicist, Einstein was also a ""pacifist"", ""philosopher"", ""sailor"", ""violinist"", and ""Zionist"", among other things.  Would including these in the first sentence of the article acomplish anything other than to muddle it?  01:34, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)"


RT @GettEmm_Jay: So before you wear a thong get yo pussy in check


Perhaps this is some kind of case-in-point where Mr. Bushmower will claim to have Asperger's to explain his behavior. Personally, I think you should keep this going just to see where it ends up.


She's rarted


I love your script, but I'm wondering about the new warnings too. If you've already addressed this, direct me to your FAQ. Thanks!


"
The Subject of the email you sent was ""Please confirm you are in control of your account."" The text of it was ""Thanks. -x""  Talk To Me "


ElKebvo misleading and unethical use of a personal website on his user page and acting as an imposter in advertising himself as a scholar. Adminstrator and editors please take note.

 ElKevbo erased a discussion of multiple people and the contribution of Sinebot about ElKevbo's consistent unethical use of his website on his User page and his posing as an imposter in reference to being a scholar. Accoring to the Wikipedia bylaws, ElKevbo is not a scholar and repeatedly states he is. He has erased all references to this discussion on his talk page which can be seen by seerachin his editing history. These archives are from discussions in the past week regarding his faking an identity as a sholar. At this time, I have removed his website, although, this was not how the process should have worked. A discussion on his talk page first and then a colloborative decision would have been ideal. ElKevbo's erasing of the conversation is further evidence of unethical behaviour. Adminstrative involvement at this time seems the best course of action.


Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because I am in the process of editing it to conform to the guidelines  there are a number of secondary sources out there that refer to it and it has some interesting history, particularly in terms of work for the Green Bay Packers.


Having a bitch ain't goofy. Having bitch dat ain't loyal is


Nigga I fire this nina like it's the first day in the job and the bitch over slept.


House

Thanks for the plot synopsis of the latest episode of House, I was looking forward to it as I haven't had a chance to watch it yet )


Yes. Merry Christmas. You fucking idiot. 86.147.202.24


, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

 Are you? Nice language. I guess if my sister's soul was going to burn in the eternal flames of hell for being a weak deviant I would be a nasty person as well.  23:37


Is that shit still going.


U sure tha bitch ain't slumped over dead ? Lol “@GucciLikeSushi: The thots is out here ! ! http://t.co/Lb9I8rHTmV”


There's no justification for using that image in Thatcher's article, and I'm quite happy to have no image at all in that section.  Fatuorum


"

 Admin Coaching

Do you admin coach cause I woud like a coach, and since your my adopter I figured I should ask you first.Gears Of War "


Fuck You

I don't need you to unblock me you fucking idiot, you have some tea217.20.127.243


User:Writ Keeper

User:Writ Keeper

User:Writ Keeper

User:Writ Keeper

User:Writ Keeper


@Elvis_NotPresly I gt android dmt kno whats in that box my nig


Welcome to Wikipedia! If you have particular changes you'd like to suggest, please do so. If you're here to rant, please review WP:NOTFORUM first.


“@Hermosa_Jayy: Can I bring anotha bitch or nah 😏”


Type of nicca owe yu money but still ask you to go n on a blunt


August 2008 (UTC)

[unindent]
Like the CFers, I don’t think voting defines this issue, particularly when critical information has been withheld from the voters.  Let's look at tat briefly...

From the Wiki page on pseudoscience we find:

“As it is taught in certain introductory science classes, pseudoscience is any subject that appears superficially to be scientific or whose proponents state is scientific but nevertheless contravenes the testability requirement, or substantially deviates from other fundamental aspects of the scientific method.[3]”

From the Wiki page on the scientific method, we find:

“Among other facets shared by the various fields of inquiry is the conviction that the process be objective to reduce a biased interpretation of the results. Another basic expectation is to document, archive and share all data and methodology so they are available for careful scrutiny by other scientists, thereby allowing other researchers the opportunity to verify results by attempting to reproduce them. This practice, called full disclosure, also allows statistical measures of the reliability of these data to be established.”

From my comments in the “Bias on both sides” section on this page we find:

The assertion that published studies on He in ‘cold fusion’ experiments came from air leaks, that this necessitates that the CFers perform ‘full disclosure’ on their experimental results and methods, and that that has not yet been done.

and:

The assertion that heavy metals found in cold fusion experiments comes from a) contaminants or b) improper analysis of data, that this necessitates that the CFers perform ‘full disclosure’ on their experimental results and methods, and that that has not yet been done.

And from my other comments on calorimetry (incl. edits to the CF  Wiki page), we find:

The assertion that apparent excess heat arises from an analytical method problem, that the CFers exclude these concerns based on a dislike of a proposed speculative physical/chemical mechanism that might or might not be a source of a calibration constant shift problem, while ignoring the mathematical fact that a 1-3% change in cal. constants can account for the large majority of such heat claims.  One fundamental aspect of the scientific method is the concept that if two alternative explanations exist for a given set of observations, then the situation is undefined and more new work must be done designed to test each alternative and distinguish between the two, because two distinct, conflicting explanations for a phenomenon can’t both be correct.  Failure to do that substantially deviates from other fundamental aspects of the scientific method.  Failure to incorporate a viable alternative into experimental protocols produces a biased interpretation of the results.

Seems to me we need a new vote…     18:48, 22


Thank you, I will restore it to the Conroe, TX page, and agree with the Michael E Tindall removal.


Pictures in family albums are usually unpublished. If it is indeed anonymous and created less than 120 years ago, then it is still copyrighted in the United States as it does not yet satisfy . In that case, you will have to ask the heir of the anonymous photographer to follow the procedure at WP:CONSENT.


This is exactly why bitches end up dead RT @CASHKILLEM: Told him to stop fucking with me , I hope it rain bitch. http://t.co/2fuxRzeVTp


[deleted]


"@Dietrich1892: Yall shut up:p" make me bitch


RT @prettykells: “@Leelucas_: @100046729 @prettykells lol bitch run ya bands up.. You know I'm dumb”I hate a broke bitch..... I hate em


Ha, what you said was a lie, when you make unsubstantiated claims without evidence, that is a blatant lie and fabrication of the truth, which is exactly what you're doing. You are trying to play arm-chair psychologist with me and infer why it was that I had done something, and accusations are not a substitute to verifiable evidence. I will just leave it at the following, people like all of you is why Wikipedia is dying and why there aren't new editors, and why nobody gives a damn to contribute. I merely started out assisting the citation of the previous content which was not mine, you people seriously need to learn what constructive editing is, you've succeeded in turning this into an entire mess, with the article having less information than it did before any of my edits. Congratulations you've vandalized the article, and with the help of Wikipedia administration! And no I was not attempting to forum-shop, I simply read the Wikipedia:Vandalism_in_progress article and followed the links to file the incident reports. Edit warring is people like you all who just destroy sections and added citations and do nothing to contribute to the actual content. 72.72.240.141


Although, i did read some things wrong, i think the part about having xy and being a woman is not one of them. The Swyer syndrome, or XY gonadal dysgenesis, is a condition, in witch babies with xy chromosomes cant develope testicles, and thus get female characteristics. They then get born with those characterristics and live as women for their entire live. I would say that those people are, without a doubt female. Please read the article for more information about it.  The reason i brought this topic up, is to show that chromosomes cant always be used to define the gender of someone, and can be really wierd overall.  I didnt ask you IF sex is determined by chromosomes. I asked you HOW that works. The exact process how the chromosomes controll every aspect of sexual development in humans.


Alumni

A large number of graduates of NUJS have been recruited by premier law firms of India and abroad by way of a student run campus recruitment process. Recruitment for the batch graduating in 2008 marked the advent of international law firms including Magic Circle firms who have picked up eight students for prestigious Training Contracts at Allen & Overy,LLP, Clifford Chance, LLP, CMS Cameron McKenna,  Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, LLP, Herbert Smith, LLP, Norton Rose, Slaughter and May and SJ Berwin, LLP. The domestic law firms which have recruited students from NUJS include Luthra & Luthra Law Offices, Amarchand Mangaldas, AZB & Partners, Trilegal, Economic Law Practice, Wadia Ghandy & Co. and many others. Among companies, ICICI Bank, Reliance Infocomm, Tata Sons, Infosys, Satyam, ITC and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories and many more were the major names which have recruited from campus. The Securities and Exchange Board of India(SEBI), the capital markets regulator in India have also recruited students from NUJS. Some graduates, albeit a minuscule number, pursue careers in litigation by joining the chambers of Senior Advocates in the Supreme Court of India or various High Courts & Trial Courts. Some graduates have also embarked on a career in law teaching. NUJS graduates have been recruited by the School of Law, Singapore Management University, NLS and NUJS itself as assistant professors and lecturers.

However, some graduates prefer not to sit for the recruitment process. Instead, they decide to pursue higher education at the some of the premier universities abroad, such as Harvard Law School, Oxford University, Cambridge University, Columbia University, Cornell University, Stanford Law School,Georgetown University, London School of Economics, New York University School of Law, the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, UC Berkeley, Tulane University etc. Graduates have received some of the most prestigious scholarships at these premier universities abroad, including the Felix Scholarship to Oxford University, the Vanderbilt Scholarship (NYU), Shell Centenary Scholarship(Oxford), the J.N. Tata Endowment Scholarship, the Chevening scholarship, and even the uber prestigious Rhodes scholarship.


"
Most definitely, ""it is a leap to think that the thermal inertia of the oceans applies to solar forcing as well.""  Very much so. Please explain.  "


"
No problem ).  I do admit that I am laughing at much of the content I'm seeing today but I'm also trying to maintain some balance in the chaos at the same time.  Glad that the material PapaJohn and I put together was able to help you!  Its tough for a full time College student to afford high priced film editing software so I try to make due with reprogramming what I already have. (talk) "


Hi my name is Sceptre and I am out of the pool due to AIDS


You don't have a citation for this statement.  Please link to a scholarly article demonstrating negative or positive review skewing in gaming reviews.  Until you can cite this, using a reliable scientific study, you are in fact stating an opinion.Occident


"

 Afro-Cuban Sahrawis

The source cited for the claim that Afro-Cubans are descended from Sahrawi refugees is misrepresented in the article. It does not claim that the Afro-Cuban population is partially comprised of Sahrawis, or that a significant number of Sahrawis immigrated to Cuba. Indeed, the article never even mentions the term ""Afro-Cuban"". Rather, it details someone's (dubious) claims about Sahrawi children from the Tindouf Camps being abducted to la Isla de Juventud for military training. Assuming that this is not all in his head, this explicitly means they are not Afro-Cuban according to that article; it states that Afro-Cubans are from sub-Saharan Africa. 96.26.213.146  "


Massacre of Turkish civilians in Galati and Iasi

This is not the primary subject of the article but since it is stated it should be stated correctly. According to a number of sources this massacre did take place, so calling it rumors is wrong.

Sources which mention the massacres:
[1] Furthermore, atrocities against Muslim residents in Jassy and Galati, in the early days of the occupation of Moldavia, promised reprisals from Ottoman.....

[1]the massacre of Turks at Galatz and Jassy..

[1]the cruel and cowardly murders of Turkish merchants, in the towns of Galatz and Jassy..

[1]Pushkin, who heard the news of the massacre of Galati and the violence in Jassy, was astonished by Ypsilantis' conduct as a general

[1]One of the first acts of the Etairia in Moldavia had been the massacre of Turkish civilians in Ia§i and Galati (Galatz...History of the Balkans, Barbara Jelavich, page 212, 1983

So doing this  is wrong.


I feel like you misunderstood the statement. We don't go out and I give her my coat every single time. In fact I rarely ever had to because I don't date a retard. But if she forgets it some time or it unexpectedly starts raining I'll do the manly thing to do.


Pseudoscience
Do a search on IPCC and Pseudoscience. A lot of people believe that the IPCC is putting out unscientific information regarding climate change. I'm not sure how you would do a fair survey of experts to find the consensus on this, as most climate change scientists are being funded to support the politicized environmental/religious agenda on this issue. Is it appropriate to tag this article with Category:Pseudoscience? Someone removed my tag, stating (hoping?) that this was a joke.


Thats what yopur mom said last night oooh


all these hoes sweating and chasing niggas on this show😩


Dear God, forgive us for a moral slope of values. Shacking is just a pretty word for perpetual fornication. Let's... http://t.co/h0URrTNDfZ


Come back, you BUTTHURT TURD DOCTOR

Where the heck have you gone?


He's been around, he vandalized my RfA a few times. I should tell him about some of the info that the admins at SoCal are feeding me, I hear there's some folks at his ISP very interested in Mr. Barber. Wouldn't that be the ultimate kicker?


(ONLY IF YOU REPORTED ME), then you can kiss my ass you fucken bitch.


This is true.  If you have the university calander it tells about the history which it is trying to keep.  I dont see how this is in violation of the policy


Only three months jail? I'd say she got her pussy pass...


You're welcome. I'm afraid  really has no interest in Wikipedia rules, and is out to push his POV no matter what, so the mess started with the first article. Now I'm concerned about the new ones and the category he made, too. -


"{{Infobox musical artist
| Name                = Joey Clement
| Img                 =
| Background          =
| Img_capt            =
| Birth_name          =
| Born                = Rapid City, SD
| Genre               = Pop, rock, indie
| Occupation          = bass guitarist, songwriter
| Instrument         = Bass, vocals
| Years_active        =
| Label               = Hollywood (2008–present)
| Associated_acts     = Selena Gomez & the Scene, Midwest Kings, David Cook, The Calling, Vitamins for Voyeurs, Ethan Roberts
| URL                 = Official website

      ___
     {o,o}
     |)__)
     -""-""-
"


I think one of my questions may be answered here.


The Finnish vandal was here.


you have a sandy vagina


Very inappropriate information - - - I am not surprised of course, but I am not going to explain 100 times and be reverted,
basically wiki then looses and it should. Paul Bern was possibly drained in the perfume, no proof,
also his lover Millette it is accepted she committed suicide but there is evidence dirty play was involved,
so how come it does not say... allegedly... so be careful with such statements.
And case was reopened as you will see noted on Bern bio, grow up vandals! What, no free wiki here!

As indicated http://geocities.com/georgereevesproject/wikipedia.html


March 2007
 Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Raffles v. Wichelhaus. It is considered vandalism, which under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox.
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice


NOW ITS PERSONAL DE BIVORT !


oh... please accept my apology, i thought you were someone else
i am sooo sorry.


You are not my friend Jew.


RT @Stoney_Blu: For example. I can't even say "what's cooler than bein cool? ICE COLD!" Without somebody relating it to A Phi A. No bitch t…


"

 Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Amway. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.    "


BTW, have you taken a look at the top of this talk page?


Lil' Bush page should be recreated and unprotected

Although it's unclear why you protected the page (please explain in the future), the show is making news and will likely need a full entry soon.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/TV/12/04/television.lilbush.reut/index.html


Help wanted

Hi, Professor. I have translated your userpage as requested.


"
First thing? Gosh no.  I've done much more than that over the past two weeks.  I wonder if you will ever give an explanation for your revert-warring.  Simply saying ""They're relevant"" does not justify the inclusion of trivial details such as the brand of his car.  Your edit summary of ""rv IP edits"" belies your true motivation here.  190.46.108.141  "


Yeah hoe. http://t.co/qZXi0IuFCf


I took advantage of a girl (not in a sexual way just the way she did favors for me and spent money on me) who really liked me. I had no interest in her but I let her do things for me she never should have. I feel terrible about it to this day. I know the pain buddy.


Perhaps the articles should be merged.


2007 (UTC)

Post Soviet occupation emigration and travel to the West

Am I correct in assuming that it only would have been possible for normal Estonians to travel to the West again in 1990?
 01:09, 8 June


WHAT?
What did I do?  Did I upset your communist feelings?  Besides, I thought that you were taking a pussy break.


I guess yes, as they have been published in a different political system while the publisher has been dissolved, as far as I know. I am not an expert on this issue so don't take these as set and done...


What on earth does anti-semitism have to do with the notion that the US military shot down the plane, Cberlet? I am quite mystified.


Look in the mirror Len, then let me know ? C u next Tuesday little buddy butt-Hurt


Adoption

Can You please adopt me?

I've had a rough start to wikipedia, I just finished a block, but that was not because I was trying to be deliberately disruptive, but because i wanted to help and made a mistake

I am quite desperate,

Please adopt me

Thank-you


It would appear that you think you must frequently edit Wikipedia in order to have any experience with it.  As I explained in the witch hunt thread about my alleged sockpuppetry, I frequently read Wikipedia's ANI thread.  I've been doing it for years.  I found it a long time ago, and I enjoy reading it.  For me, it's hilarious to see some blatant vandals try to wiggle their way out of blocks.  Plus, there's always some absurd editors who just make a scene.  I read your thread, which was one of the most entertaining I've ever read.  Then, as a service to you, I registered a name because I didn't see that you'd taken a break.  I understand now that you did take a break, and I already apologized for my mistake.  Why do you think that I must be stalking you in order to come across your page?  To me, that's a little out there, man.  Of course, I don't know much about your history.  Perhaps you're a little sensitive on the matter because of some past experience.  In either case, I'd be more than happy to end this communication and wish you all the best (as I've already suggested, but you continued to badger me with your previous post).  Or, for all I care, you can just block this username.  It won't stop me from browsing Wikipedia like I have in the past.  Either way is fine, but I hope you realize that I was just trying to lend a helping hand.  It's offensive that this has gone this far.
Love, Mungy


Adoption?
Hi, Katie. I am also interested in adopting you. I have been a member for a long time, and edit many pages in German, French, and English. I am 3rd generation American, decending from Austrian/German heritage. Are you still interested in adoption? I would love to help you.


her ass mann bro i can sit on her shit l😂😂😂 she walk by like i wasnt gone grab it bitch bye ✌


RT @dbrend99: Even if you hate the Yankees there is no way you can't like Derek Jeter, he is one of the classiest and most respectful playe…


Articur wirr need to be a revised
Some a row rife making fun of the chinese peopur.  Edit page prease


"]]; lack of proper styling (title should have an ""é"" in ""Pokémon"")"


anti-canadian

Can you tell me what is going wrong the mediation.   I'm having trouble figuring out what's happening.


"

One thing you should know about me
I really hate it when people use the word ""spam"" about me. My comment was just an information that i will save this article before it probably cease to exist. I handle so in german Wikipedia.
It has nothing to do with spam! I always use to save articles to Wikia projects when they're on deletion log. Keep that in mind and don't call that word anymore due to my presence   "


POV Tag

Sorry, but there is just way too much content here from a single self-published source, Tim Field, without any other citations. This really needs to be checked for POV.


Turkey | hahaha==

I love you men, the link I sent you and what my comment said is that KOSOVA will open an embassy in TURKEY - not the other way around. I went and made the edit myself; first edit I've ever made in wikipedia. Kinda cool, well sorta.

==


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Phyllis Wheatley, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.


No its a degenerate subhuman white man


Boyfriend sounds like a bitch.


I'm addicted to IG, Twitter just my side bitch


Poachers are bad in that africa. We should have people shoot the poachers... 😡 No one is going to stop them unless death is involced.


filthy wetback communists


and the same user has been blocked indef


This is fucking trash. RT @DearLeader10: Drake is Jewish too RT @QUEcified: So Young Money is the 3rd Reich now?

https://t.co/DONsGdPTVr


Er...irrelevant, much?


"
 You're enabling a group of editors whose entire purpose here is to propagandize for their ethnonationalist cause and spread derision on the enemy. The serious failure is to allow the warping of wikipedia articles over a period of years, not my refusal to adopt a warped and frankly childish internal Wikipedia values system. I know this beyond your understanding. Those fellows will be delighted  maybe they'll return the article to the staet it started and the lede said the article was evidence of the ""debasement of the Arab mind."" . I pity you. I really do. So it goes, so it goes.  "


Russophobia

Could you look on the page ? Right now it makes even Partitions of Poland seem a reaction to Russophobia ) Not to mention it doesn't seem to source any of the various serious claims. It also lists Serbs, Orthodox religion etc.Both of which fit into other articles (leaving aside if they are true or not). Molobo


see that I was unjustly blocked for doing something Wikipedia allows me to do. My post was reverted by SandyGeorgia whose continued unchecked belligerence toward me is exemplified in the following section of that post. She makes constant accusations against me without providing any proof, no diffs, no examples - how is this not considered disruptive? How is her reversal of my edit on Wikiproject Catholicism not considered disruptive?


"

 About what ""quick-failing"" reeally is for

efore conducting an extensive review, and after ensuring you are viewing an unvandalized version, check the article and its edit history for the following basic problems which are sometimes found in GA nominations.

 The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.Small articles that have a single main source may still be adequately referenced without the use of inline citations.  Inline citations may not be required for some articles; the criteria name the only six types of material that require inline citations.
 The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.Articles on controversial topics can be both neutral and stable, but this is only ensured if regular editors make scrupulous efforts to keep the article well-referenced.  Note that neutrality does not mean that all points of view are covered equally: instead no point of view should be given undue weight.
 There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including , ,  or large numbers of , , or similar inline tags. (See also .)
 The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
 The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
 The article contains significant close paraphrasing or copyright violations

Another thing to look for is that if the article has been nominated more than once, go back to the previous reviews and make sure suggestions from the other reviews have been addressed.

If the article has any of the above problems, it may be premature to provide a detailed review, in which case you can ""quickfail"" the nomination in accordance with step two of the GAN guidelines, as long as you explain this clearly on the review page. They most commonly apply when the nominator is inexperienced or is not a regular editor of the article. If you ""quick-fail"" an article according to the above criteria, leave a short note explaining the major problems and inform the nominator.

Even if an article can be ""quick-failed"" according to the above criteria, reviewers could also:

 Leave a short note explaining the major problems, but without officially closing the review until the editors at the article have had a few days to respond to your concerns.  You may find that they are interested in significantly improving the article.
 Provide a detailed review, as more specific information will help future editors improve the article to meet all of the Good article criteria, but close the review as ""not listed"".
 Withdraw from the review, and let another reviewer decide how to handle it.

Emphasis added by me. So please remember to always actually/carefully read any policies/guidelines before using them (and to not ask other users for opinions, because they might be completely misguided - just always find and read them yourself), like that (source).   "


I made a few changes.  People can click over to the article on the Washington Times, for instance, and read about its connection to the church.


No, you cannot get my account banned you ignorant moron. Shut the fuck up. Go play cop you little bitch.


Whoa if true! https://kek.gg/u/CYCb


I'm sorry but why should I care about what bitch my nigga was fucking w before me


Slow process at my age, but working on it, I can hold down more than saltines and 7-UP now...


"

You are missing the point. The phrase you quote is in a summary of other scholars' arguments. When summarizing the view of a sub-group we are not supposed to render our opinion on whether their arguments are valid. Nor do we decide whether to include their views on the basis of whether their views are consistent with wikipedia editorial policy. If a substantial minority of scholars argued that Julius Caesar's astrological chart ought to be considered historical evidence, it would be incumbent upon wikipedia to report that in the relevant article. An absurd example, but I hope it illustrates how you are missing the point. Furthermore, as for the scholars' argument itself, they are not arguing against ""methodological naturalism"" or history as an ""empirical science."" In fact, many evangelicals offer mounds of evidence (convincing or otherwise) for their views (including single authorship of Isaiah) that adhere to methodological naturalism and empirical science. See Kenneth Kitchen's On the Reliability of the Old Testament (Eerdmans, 2003) for the most significant example. Rather, by ""outmoded modernist presuppositions,"" evangelicals typically refer to practices and assumptions of source critics that are even now recognized as obsolete by secular scholars. For instance, the assumptions held by former adherents of the documentary hypothesis are now rejected, leading to Neo-Documentary Hypothesis proponents (e.g., Jeffery Stackert at University of Chicago) that rely less on such outdated methods and assumptions. 70.131.155.15

In other words, nothing I wrote was intentionally biased. Rather, it was intended to remove bias and to update the article to reflect the true situation in the academy."


please stop touching me innapropriately


Btw Johann, that's one tasty bird.


If you missed Tucker tonight, you missed a pretty shocking story about the future of free speech in Europe. The Orwellian "European court of human rights" has basically instituted the 1st stages of sharia law in Europe.   #1A


KILL YOURSELF.

KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF KILL YOURSELF


Good Work

Hey Alex. Good work on the John Howard article. If there ever was a page that is under attack by leftist scum then this is it. God bless you. Keep the good fight going.


If this socialist retard wins, I will be shocked.....then again, watch the lame stream media and he is an angel.


the history list ayn working


How about you shut up then!!!


I APPROVE THAT PREVIOUS TEXT TO BE ON MY TALK PAGE, SIR! I HAVE A RIGHT TO HAVE  WHATEVER I WANT ON IT!


RT @nebuladallas: i still live with hope that one day a hot rich boy will fall in love with me even though im trash


I've never lied on Reddit, there's no reason to. Some people are like "I've gotta make something up that's fun and exciting to get imaginary internet points!", but I guess I'd rather get karma by being honest and saying my opinion, not by making up some elaborate scenario.


Makes me realize. I wonder if people are turning gay cause they hate their parents or have something to do with parenting and divorce and not receiving love... Idk but I feel like im getting close...


I have not been blocked. At no point did I try to edit Wikipedia to find myself blocked. It must have been a very short 'block' by a Wikipedian admin community aware that it wasn't entirely in the right in the matter.80.229.223.248


This information now lives in the production section of the article, although if you think it would be better suited to reception, then feel free to move it. Don't, however, reinstate it to the articles lead, as this makes for too long a read (and it isn't very pretty!)


RT @RnadJorell: “@_KudaBrazyy: "You Disrespected My Hoeing" Pimp Slaps Hoe In The Telly For Talking Back! - http://t.co/XfBbm7cJTY”aha bitch


That's well and good, but he still doesn't outright say it will happen.


REDIRECT Talk:Cutler School (New York City)


Bless its heart!


Not flat at all

I walked the length of Flat Bastion Road last weekend. Talk about misnamed! There's nothing flat about it. -)


"

The are limits to what can be done with brief passages. And I think we can claim a little leeway at this level of the article development. Worst case, if no other combination of words can manage to put over the facts and you are left with what looks like a direct lift from the source, I'd suggest putting quotes either side of the words that do match eg 'the right wing broke off where it was attached to the fuselage; the aircraft was ""already on fire when it came to rest"".    "


"
Sure!  (talk•edits) "


Bayard, you are a winnerr!!!!!!!!!! yipeeeeeee!

You dare to defend the CCP, you punk?


Bite Me, Redux

Really.  Stop leaving silly messages for people if you don't want them to talk back to you.


Zuko gets bitches


These bitches so redundant


...what


REDIRECT Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Kajol


REDIRECT Talk:Hit o Nerae!


editing]] • Develop an article
 The perfect article • Manual of style
 Pages needing attention • Peer review
 The missing manual
|}
|}
|}


, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
I think the table needs to be kept somewhere that can be easily accessed. The arguement only stays won until someone comes along and edits. What better place than on the new 'Countries' article. Then we would be back to square one. Surely, none of us want to go through all that again.   13:47


I think they should take it down and put it in a museum


'A Nigger by any other name would still rob, rape, murder.'   I am a poet!


"
 I am somewhat confused by your statement that Astynax continues to promote Landmark as a religion. First, the use of the word ""promote"" is almost exclusively used in what would be considered a ""positive"" sense, and Landmark among others does not think of itself as a religion, so that description isn't necessarily ""positive."" Also, as I think can be seen, the Human potential movement which Landmark is generally a part of is counted as a new religious movement, whose name strongly implies ""religious"" nature but only implicitly, and in fact est is listed in the List of new religious movements I helped put together based on the articles contained in encyclopedic sources on NRMs I found. So there is in my eyes no real reason for really questioning est's inclusion as a NRM. In response to  if you have any sources available to help improve the article, or which might be useful in determining which article we should use as the primary article on this topic area, any input would be more than welcome. So far as I can tell, Landmark has pretty much said that they were initially using the est approach, although they have admitted to changing it subsequently (I'm not sure how much, or if they've ever specifically indicated in what ways). So it might be that something like Landmark Forum or some similar title might be the best main article for the topic of the seminars as a whole, with specific information on the various groups and companies related to it in articles on those topics. Maybe. This is a bit of an active controversy around here, and the topic area has recently been reviewed by ArbCom because of its contentiousness, but if you have any sources availableor other input which you think might be useful we would all welcome seeing them.   "


@SteveWorks4You pay your taxes teabaggers


External links

Please read WP:EL - sniffa.com does not meet our criteria for an external link and I am removing it from the articles where you've added it. Don't take this personally, please, but don't add it again. If you have any questions you can ask me, preferably on my talk page.


Bitch you frooooontin, bitch you frooooontin. Lol


It is fine to disagree on matters of opinion but facts are facts.  UGG is a registered trademark worldwide [cite to tm list] and the validity of the UGG trademark has been upheld in multiple decisions in multiple countries. [cite to US case] [add cites see me]  Please review these references.  I don’t think this is a debatable issue.  The only reliable contrary reference is the UGH-BOOTS decision in Australia, and that fact is referenced in the revised text.


Haha!! Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal is ashknazi jew LOL!! jews are assholes!!


The topic is over. None of them get the same points.  Giggs


"

 Your question to Mongo

It's perfectly normal to delete the talk page of a deleted page. And as for the protection, well it's hard to believe that that's a genuine question from someone who innocently and genuinely is wondering and has no intent to harass and annoy another user. I'll give you a little piece of advice it you want to avoid being blocked for disruption and harassment. If someone deletes something from his own talk page, assume that he has read it and do NOT  attempt to repost it. If you are sufficiently familiar with Wikipedia to be able to check logs and know who deleted or protected a particular page, then you are also have sufficient knowledge to be able to work out for yourself why the page you refer to was deleted and protected, whether or not you agree with the decision.  ♫ "


I have yet to meet someone who leaned to the left that could have a conversation without doing the following:       - Interrupting the other party 1/2 way through any and every sentence that doesn't agree with the left-leaning opinion.   - Calling the other party uneducated, retarded, moronic, etc.   - Turning the conversation into an on-the-spot requirement for the other party to change their opinion and relentlessly hound them until they feel like they've "won".   - When above methods fail, make a scene to garner attention and support from other lefties in an attempt to call for backup under the premise that because there's more of them screaming at the other party, the other party must be wrong.       Now there ARE people on both sides who do this and they're all useless people because nothing constructive comes from anything these types of people do, ever. What I am saying is that I have only seen people who are not like this on the right side. I have never in my life met anyone who didn't do this and was on the left. However, I have met hundreds of sensible people who do absolutely none of the above things and can have conversations on complex topics. They have all been right-leaning people and I don't think it's been a coincidence.       You take that however you want. Maybe you're the first, maybe not. only the future will tell.


You really need to tone down the wording about the company's products and spend more time on its history (not just copying a timeline), getting some neutral third party sources, and writing it to discuss it in a more neutral tone.


"

""I resigned because I was the subject of an SEC informal probe into my trading practices."" - I for one would probably believe Mr. Calandra's statement this time because that is exactly what happened. This statement belongs on Wiki imo."


If you don't believe Ryan's words on his own blog on his own site then I don't know what'll convince you.


54, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Clarification of Edit Policy
In addition ScienceApologist has mead two reverts where no consensus exist, one at 14:23, January 31, 2008and the second at 19:29, January 31, 2008. Finally OrangeMarlin has made the same revert once,  however ScienceApologist and ScienceApologist often work in tangent to further their POV. I request that the probation warning be enforced and the page be rollback to where it was at the time of the posting of the probation message.   20:


They need to give them mandatory DNA tests and kick them all out of France .


"

An event in this article is a April 30 selected anniversary (may be in HTML comment)

 A question has been bugging me
From the time the first US military advisors stepped in to Vietnam in the early 60s to the final withdrawal of all US troops in 1973 the USSR and China repeatedly warned Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon NOT to cross the DMZ and directly invade North Vietnam. That seems simple enough that we were not allowed to go in to the North BUT my question is were the South Vietnamese Forces allowed to go on the offensive and invade North Vietnam? Did USSR and China ever warn the South not to invade the North?

Considering the U.S.'s coordination with and funding for ARVN, I'm sure that they would take South Vietnamese ground forces in North Vietnam much the same way they'd take Marines. The only ""crossing of the DMZ"" that occurred was American bombing raids.
Probably not, but it is doubtful that such an operation could have been pulled off.  23 July 2005
It's hard to imagine what further threats the major communist powers could have used to dissuade S.V. from doing anything. But I agree with CJK, the limited competence of the ARVN in offensive operations seems well-established in the historical record, e.g. the offensive in Laos.  (talk) 03:04, 2005 July 24 (UTC)
The forgotten factor in this little chat is the fact that the South and its dissident ""South"" Vietnamese were often the target of U.S. bombing. Keep in mind that the terms ""North"" and ""South"" were circumstantial, and not actually representative of the demographic split. ""North and South"" often simply repeats the ideological and geographic claims about the nature of the war, which American soldiers, for example, found to be not the reality: Many (perhaps most) people in the ""democratic"" South were pro-independence, despite the Western-allied/ethnic Catholic elite. Hence any use of ""North and South"" carries an inherent biased disparity with the facts. -|t
I don't know what you are talking about. We were discussing whether or not the Soviets or Chinese would react if South Vietnam sent its forces to invade North Vietnam.  24 July 2005
""I dont know what you are talking about."" Well, it would really help if you did, wouldnt it? -|t
Well maybe you shouldn't bring up unrelated issues in the middle of a specific discussion.  25 July 2005
I'd just like to commend the recent additions to the article.
Actually, to my understanding, there were still many rescue raids (of captured POWs) or commando attacks that were conducted by either U.S. commandos or the ""Biet Dong Quan"" (the ARVN equivalent) against the north during the war. It's an honour to meet celebrities like you, Trey and Parker Stone. I appreciate your criticisms to my editions on the Vietnam War page. - .
well others watching this page are quite capable of RVing Marxist language and POV it seems.
And would RVing 'capitalist language and POV' be ok with you? -|t
I don't know what ""capitalist language"" means, but if it existed and was POV then I would have no problems with its reversion.
We were actually talking about a full scale attack by South Vietnam, not a raid.  24 July 2005

Let's assume the South Vietnamese Army, without US troop support, did gather a formidable invasion force and did cross the DMZ in to the North, would the Chinese and/or USSR intervene and play the ""defending an ally card"" for the North exactly like how we did for the South?
I know this is a hypothetical assumption, but still, it's irrelevant, because the ARVN was never able to operate well without U.S. assistance. So answering your hypothetical, if that did happen active intervention in the form of Chinese or Soviet troops would probably not be necessary given the PAVN's superior capabilities. if we had somehow managed to make the ARVN into a capable offensive force and we were able to take over North Vietnam then yes, I'd expect the PLA (army in China) to intervene just like they had in North Korea. but American go


She is a paki. Could pass as a sea nigger


"@Queen_Kaaat: It took a while for you to find me, but I was hiding In the lime tree."
@Iemonaids dis bitch in da wrong tree bro.


There's not enough day in the hours to cheat on her if she's sucking your dick right. Too drained to look for other mouth and pussy


They own the cities.  They are asking to be imprisoned and raped.  GET OUT NOW.


ARC Gritt, the fucking cunt of all cunts, ruined me by saying I vandalised 2009 Formula One season. What a cunt.


Deleting the article would very improper on your part. Doing so would obviously be an act againist freedom of speech. The articles quotes references, they are in bold type. Deleting would only reveal your bias and fears. There are articles on criticism of many books, but when you do about the talmud, I Jew am accused of being anti-Semite, disgusting. It's not in an essay form, it lists many, many references including profession books, websites, and quotations from books, and Jewish scholars. It is in point form to help make adjustment. I now have a copy of the article so don't think about about trying to delete it I and others will just put back on! It's call presenting different side, or againist that freedom too?


#oomf can get it but I'm chilling till da bitch hit me up


& Mineral County Alternative Schools!


, though if the target article exists, the link will work even if it shows red


":::::* I'll be sure that my future blocks are so cut and dry, black and white correct that we won't need to waste our time with these discussions. Thank you for your concern.  msg me
"


RT @WhitePeopleTalk: “KOBE” as they shoot a piece of paper into the trash


"

There were two main reasons why I closed: The solid arguments WP:SALAT and WP:NOT#DIRECTORY. ""Keep - but remove red links"" isn't really a solid rationale; it didn't really address the two arguments above. The second keep was stronger, but again didn't really address the points above, and was more along the lines of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. As We66er said, removing the redlinks would leave a list of five, which defeats the object of a ""list"". On the counter side of that argument, redlinks show potential for new articles, but when there are so many redlinks, there is no need for such a list. There were many items on the list, yet only a handful were referenced, and as another said, one of the organisations on that list had been deleted previously through AfD. The strongest keep therefore was WP:STAND, but that was struck as a result of misinterpretation. This is the full reason for my close. However, deleting admins don't generally say any more than ""keep"" or ""delete"" in their closing statement, unless 1) there is a specific reason for the delete and/or 2) it was a decision that could cause controversy. Generally the reasons for delete are ascertainable in the discussion itself. By the way, the text is at User:GRuban/deleted article for your review. Best, "


Stop being a faggot and stand up for your race, white man.


Natalie Ogle is an accomplished British Actress.


I can feel that Black peoples are taking old justice law in their hands! As is said: "life for life". And thanks for it as police brutality scares even white people ( I have this experience in US myself - not won't it again, wasn't nice) if I am their suspect I am treated like that, police is often not safe > brainwashed fanatics with guns and backup of more these idiots with law uniform covering them.


CardinalDan FUCK YOU FAGGOT NIGGER CUNT LICKING CHINK DIPFUCKING SHIT NIGGER FACE, GET A LIFE OTHER THEN DELETING SHIT OFF WIKI YOU NERD FAGGOT


The closest that a ghetto nigger can get to the White House without the Chicago Democratic Machines backing is to rap abt it.


Support - The other article is minor, and not worth a separate entry. Furthermore, it will be a lot easier to find under the Leys School entry, the obvious place to look for it. Yes, definitely merge!!


Wow. I never knew there was any other way to interpret that statement. I always looked at it as the example case where you have some guy who knows one little piece of info and therefore they think they know all info on a subject.


That is where guys like Secular talk get it wrong. They want to build some left wing economic utopia while ignoring the giant gorilla in the room which is race. The nonwhite races are taking over the party & the only economic justice they care about is how much money is transferring from White pockets to theirs.


THIS HALF MUSLIM NIGGER IS NOT A  BORN AMERICAN. HE IS A FRAUD, AND NEEDS DESTROYED PERIOD.


Yiddish: Asyva (pronunciation)

 Asyva (in English transcription),
 Asjva (in Czech transcription),
 Aßjwa (in German transcription),
 Asjwa (in Polish transcription).


I just want to give a special shout out to those taking time to leave reviews of my books at Amazon.  It really helps, and the five minutes you take to share an impression helps keep my efforts afloat.   Thus far, I'm proud to say the last effort in The Coming Civil War is getting five stars across the board.   https://www.amazon.com/Coming-Civil-War-Tom-Kawczynski/dp/1719921466


Disappointing.

...in regards to the level of opposition at ITN/C over a monumental handshake/meeting being put up on the front page. But thank you for your support! I was really hoping to see more people involved in Ireland-related articles putting their view across on this.


Fuk uy all you can nevr do anyething i love meredith and springlyn just as mush een if you kil me


"

 Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Paramore. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.   | Talk "


@okoruoni You're trash.


YOu have been blocked for threee hours.   Farmbrough.


Witey bad. injins good. witey survival bad. non white extermination of wites good. the perfect retard npc, parroting communist horse shit.


"
What do you mean ""one article doesn't even exist""?  "


I legit had a feminist argue with me how Janine didn't have a presence in the movies and wasn't memorable.When I pointed out how wrong she was, I got the answer "Oh well, I never watched those movies so LOL! But yea, she doesn't count." These people are the target audience of the remake.


"

Bigot Alert!
  Knock off the racist bullshit.  This is the most pathetic thing I've ever seen."


that the editor provided


nice word control, thirsty nigger man


RT @F1abraham: Crew of women hillbillies & gangsters w/the director #ItsAWRAP @AxemanTheMovie @JostonTheney @RachelEReilly ✈🎬🎥 http://t.co…


This is why we need a big beautiful wall, and not a stupid fucking fence.


afrocentrism

hey there, could you please explain your edits to afrocentrism?   once will be enough.  for now its hard to see if you're just pushing someones buttons or really think the reversions are correct (or both).  thanks a lot.


"
Oppose - General use of the term ""hero"" is much more notable than the TV show.  "


Admin assistance needed
Hi Gwen.  (1.) I have tried to access your last two talk page archives, but I cannot seem to be able to access them.  (2.) Also, when use the Wiki Toolserver app to try to see the articles you have created and / or edited, it says that your user name does not exist.  I suspect there may be some incorrect config setting on your username.  I have checked using the usernames of other admin's and there does not appear to be any restriction which prevents their data from being reported by the tool.  As a sysadmin could you please assist in these two matters and let me know  Thanks.


Helicobacter heilmannii?
Could someone please create a page for Helicobacter heilmannii (formely known as Gastrospirillum hominis)? It is a human pathogen causing gastritis very similar to H. pylori. 207.179.172.216


What settlement would result in this retarded decree?


"

 Not so!  Taft made an even bigger error.

As was thoroughly discussed in the blawgosphere in the last 24 hours or so, there is likely no person anywhere with standing to challenge the oath as void, and in any case taking the oath is a condition precedent to executing the office; it is not actually important that it be done a particular way.  It's a formality.  The presidency began at noon, as everyone agrees.  Taft, in administering the oath to Hoover used the word ""maintain"" instead of another word, I think it was preserve.  There is no non-crazy person who believes that Hoover was therefore not actually President.

I would point you to a Wikipedia essay that might help you relax, but then I'd be in need of similar medicine. HAND."


"

 A barnstar for you!

{| style=""background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;""
|rowspan=""2"" style=""vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;"" |
|style=""font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;"" | The Copyeditor's Barnstar
|-
|style=""vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;"" | Your logic, analysis, delivery, and edits are flawless.  Keep up the good work.  Also, try not to be discouraged in what seems to be at times the impossible task of educating the obstinate.   "


I assume you r username is from: a discussion about a problem, then you provide a solution and say, “ Forget about it


...but a note on the user's talk page would have been a good first step

You mean like this? Oh, right, I did that.  | Talk


"@DBAB_Holloway: Check out our 12th man. #CowboysNation" even with all those faggot ny fans in the stands


"

 You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the ""reviewer"" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. —  "


Just another example of Harris wasting tax-payer money.  Also, what's Kamala doing in Israel?   And what's Murkowski doing in Iceland?  https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/2018/2/12/senate-section/article/s879-1?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22FOREIGN+TRAVEL+FINANCIAL+REPORTS%2C+israel%22%5D%7D&r=2&overview=open#content


socialist utopia

InedibleHulk moved my comment and then Itsmejudith left an unsigned comment.  I have both reversed the moval and signed the unsignature.  If either of you wishes to change this, feel free, but please don't move my comment again; double indenture is the proper method if you wish to add a comment above a prior comment.


@a    Twitter  said that a “bug” sent user’s private direct messages to third-party developers “who were not authorized to receive them.”   #WalkAwayFromTwitter #DirectMessages #MayHave? #LOL   https://techcrunch.com/2018/09/21/twitter-bug-sent-user-direct-messages-to-developers-for-over-a-year/


New low for massive hyperbole, Hcobb. The F-22 is not a nation of hundreds of millions of people.


@_tonydennis it's trash ik just wanted to fuck with Dorsey


Christian Morecraft - Heavyweight


"
 (a supervillain way, some translators said as when Zabuza said ""Kono Momochi Zabuza"" to refer to say ""I am Momochi Zabuza"") - ""The Sharingan's true power...I, Uchiha Madara's power."" He isn't saying that he is Madara, just holds his powers."


List of characters in The Smurfs
Hi!  Noticed your edits.  Have a look at WP:CONTEXT before adding more links?  Wiki used to link common words, but the practice now is not to. Regards!


What a bitch.. #pshh


"

 Jorge Gracie
The article was deleted via a 3-2 vote.  This isn't a consensus but rather a small majority. I have seen quite often when a 3-2 vote did not result in deletion but the talk of no consensus reached.   Additionally, many individuals in the articles for deletion noted Jorge via MMAnote rather than MAnote .   At worst, I would like to have this article userfied.  Thank you.
Rough Consensus on wikipedia is about balancing arguments against consensus not policy. So on one hand we had keep votes arguing against an inherent notability that didn't have a policy background and a delete side that was arguing that the subject did not meet the GNG/inclusion guideline because the sources were inadequate. The sources brought up in the discussion did not seem to meet the GNG so I was left with policy based arguments to delete and non-policy based arguments to keep. That gives a rough consensus to delete. I'm always happy to userfy. Where would you like it.  Humbug!
Fully disclosing my biases toward keep on this issue, I agree with  that you made an erroneous decision on this one. I'm no admin, but the debate appears fully in the midst of no consensus, which as you well know, in deletion discussions, normally results in the article, page, image, or other content being kept. I find it confusing that you would say that the keep votes didn't have a specific policy foundation in mind when I specifically and intentionally addressed WP:BASIC as the guildeline (particularly because this was a bio) and then listed a recently published book, black belt magazine, and (least but not irreverently so) the BJJ heroes biography as sources which achieve this guideline. If, for whatever reason, you find the more prime WP:GNG to be the true standard of retention for this article, well I see no reason why it does not equivalently square with nor meet the standards set forth in WP:BASIC. I say this in due respect sir.
I'm a bit confused BASIC is a simplification of the GNG, Please can you explain which sources are suitable to determine notability in this case? Thanks,.   Humbug!
Good sir, I'm a bit flummoxed as to what it is about the glut of sources that ISN'T particularly suitable for you. Is it the ""Significant coverage"" or some other such sub-section of the GNG specifically? I believe that this source would have more than met that. I mention WP:BASIC specifically because this is (was) a biography and BASIC pertain to biographies specifically. Most critically is the section: ""If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial (as many of these sources admittedly were not), then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability, which the at least dozen or so sources DID in a non-trivial manner. Now I know I'm not a administrator, and I don't have the permissions nor presumably knowledge to adjudicate these affairs, but I do casually work on more than enough bios to know that when the majority of all biographies (take this as an example) are FAR less cited and left kept or otherwise unmolested clearly there is a double standard in effect here.
I have reviewed the sources. Have you read the guideline on reliable sourcing The only reliable source in the deleted article was the book reference and that was roughly 100 words. That and fan sites does not a wikipedia biography make. Also see Other stuff exists.  Humbug!
You can userfy it over here.  I will update it and improve it. Buddy23Lee you can perform fixes to it as well.  Make it a complete article. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:CrazyAces489/jorgegracie
I would certainly contribute my efforts if this is made so.
I would like to note that under https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Consensus#mediaviewer/File:Consensus_Flowchart.svg  I did make further ed


"

 Release Date

Although the title says ""Summer 2006"", I've called around EB Games and quite a few other places, and they said Sega intends on releasing Sonic 2K6 the same day as the PS3, at least in Canada (where I am). Shall i add that note to the release date information on the page?

   "


Hopefully no. We don't need any echo chambers. If your ideology can't withstand a little shit posting, then your ideology is trash! You political rivals will throw everything they can at you, and it will be you looking like an NPC if all you can do is spout buzzwords.


RT @RegaloDeJah_: “@Ausettt: Girls like her make it hard for the rest of us 😒 http://t.co/g8KdlxFqm2” and u wonder why u bitches get expose…


Canada, Canada, Canada, Canada and Canada because they don't deserve to be beside America


The hoax is apparantly metastasizing now and spreading out.  The hoax has been exposed, but now the hoaxer is creating hoaxes within hoaxes by masquerading as representatives of the Barbaro Family and Fenwick High School in the related discussion pages.  I have a suspicion that if this isn't just some teenage/frat prank or a deranged person, that the individual or individuals behind the hoax intend to falsify the provenance of ebay items and/or masquerade as the falsified identity of VV Barbaro.  In any case it's becoming far too time consuming.  IP bans should occur.
hyper_individualist@yahoo.com


Jozef Tiso lead

Since I have not received a response from you on my earlier question, I will repeat it. Where do we stand on the issue of only referring to Tiso as a fascist in the lead? Are you still insisting on this point? I look forward to your reply.


Your edit to Ludwig Wittgenstein
Hi Goodmorningworld.

From article:

After G. E. Moore's resignation in 1939, Wittgenstein, who was by then considered a philosophical genius, was appointed to the chair in Philosophy at Cambridge. He acquired British citizenship soon afterwards, and in July 1939 he traveled to Vienna to assist Gretl and his other sisters,  Regards,


"

 RB106

""There really is increasingly little point in bothering with anything"" was exactly my reaction to your footling revert of my edit here. In this context 0.1 million is NOT the same thing as 100,000. Over and out. 86.183.11.22  "


Also to cross off point 3 about images.


removing those pictures off of that page right now you gibberish guy


Kayci and I greet each other by saying "hey cunt" like it makes me lol


You obviously only know extremely low, depraved and mentally retarded females in your ghetto.


That's because, unlike Kavanaugh, the accusations against her husband are TRUE! Hillary says sex claims against Bill are NOT like the Kavanaugh https://dailym.ai/2A1tR4k via @MailOnline


and :here where it has always been


the first copy i had would glitch and prevent me from finishing the main missions. It was some guy falling off a building and you had to catch him in a truck...a year or so later i finally got to finish it


JFC. That's why I said it the way I did. "Undefeated champ". It was tongue in cheek, remove stick from ass.


Historical?!? I can point to a law book TODAY and prove White males are being exploited, (Affirmative Action, Duluth model, Care based morality codes..). I can point to countless examples of right wing censorship IRL, on line, making us the only true victims in existence today. Fuck history. Stop stealing my money and crying.


Christian Exodus

Does this group self-identify as fundamentalist or did a Wikipedia editor apply the label?  If they do not self-identify, I will remove the tag and link for NPOV, following the Associated Press guidelines for use of the term.  18:51, August 24, 2005 (UTC)


, it doesn't look like she is notable enough for an article (see WP:ARTIST and WP:GNG), however, you could put in a request at WP:Articles for creation, and someone else will look at it in depth, or you could create it yourself - your ENglish is definitely good enough. Best wishes,


"

Thank you DGG. But, I've never advertised myself as a ""Wikipedia Manager"". I don't own any website where such an advert is placed. I'll like  to see the link if you've got them. Except if you're referring to my external profile links on Elance.com, Freelancer.com, and Odesk.com. On such platforms, I only advertised my services as a ""Wikipedia editor"" alongside other services I render such as web content, blogging, ebook writing, etc. Wikipedia editing is just part of what I do. I only started editing recently. Thanks again.  "


RT @Dory: my anaconda don't want none, unless you defeat the Huns, son http://t.co/uzTkGaWTfM


"

 Sources, offers, and 1975 Iraqi government ads in Toronto Star, New York Times, and Le Monde

It should be mentioned how different Arab governments have said they would allow former Jewish citizens of their nations to return and live in the Arab world (Morocco, Egypt, Yemen, Iraq, etc). Putting aside if one considers this a credible offer or possible. The clearest example of this (again putting aside what one thinks of it) was again by the Iraqi government on December 11, 1975 putting full page advertisements in numerous Western newspapers (The New York Times, Toronto Star, and Le Monde) asking any Iraqi Jews who left Iraq to feel free to return to Iraq (again putting aside whether one views this as a genuine offer or not). This page is sourced  and is done by someone with a Ph. D.  Also the reality of the existence of in particular the Iraqi government advertisements of December 11, 1975 (calling for any Iraqi Jews to come back to Iraq) is admitted even by ideologically Zionist website [www.eretzyisroel.org/~jkatz/discredit.html] which state that pro-Zionist groups ""scoffed at"" the Iraqi offer.

This info should be included and the sources are valid (written by a Ph. D.), especially if writings of the ""JCPA"" is included as the JCPA is an obviously partisan think-tank associated with the Israeli Likud party in particular (so any noting of the legitimate sources I'm providing, putting aside the pro-Zionist source corroborating in particular the 1975 Iraqi government advertisements, being partisan to one side should also then have the ""JCPA"" links and writings removed for partisan reasons). This info should be included in the ""compensation"" section as it by itself (the offer, whether one believes it or things like it are genuine or not) would be an offer of not just ""compensation"" but a return to where one originally came from in the first place. Putting aside that one of the most thorough discussions of the whole issue has been done by Professor Shenhav.  "


Hoes and dey hoe poses


"

Draft
An earlier draft was declined, hence the news story above. The issue was not notability per se, but rather the lack of references. &Windows; "


Found Footage. Way too many films use found footage for the sake of it, without considering whether it's an effective way to present the story. It's always shaky and grainy and unfocused, which makes sense in the Blair Witch Project because they were filming a documentary, but in other movies the story is not actually advanced by the method (or is actually held back or derailed by it) and they should just be shot traditionally in my humble opinion.


Pictures
This page needs more pictures. Can anyone find some?


Pigs' tunes are more tasteful than their name was the name of the article Chris Dixon wrote as a contributing writer about The Pigs. A caption under the groups pictures states: The Pigs:Once you listen, you may be quite surprised at what this group has to offer. The music on the album Icewater Pockets ranges from hooky pop tunes to slightly twangy ballads, to very complex rhythms and harmonies.The Red and Black Thursday, February 28, 1991


So much white trash at this demo derby 😂👏 🇺🇸


It was clear vandalism, both the official Everards site and the official Field Head site list their locations as Markfield.


Mdann52, thank you again.  I am sorry to see that one of my cyber stalkers has retaliated against you as well.  I noticed that right after you relisted a discussion, he just went ahead and closed the discussion anyway before anyone else could even comment.  Shameful.  I am sorry to see you blown of and insulted in such a way, especially by someone totally ignorant of the subject matter.


"
He must have written that article title himself.    (話して下さい) "


One time I was at the thrift store and there was this little bald girl who must've been on chemo or something and her parents. She picked up a hair brush off one of the shelves and said "mommy I want this" and her mom said "but you don't have any hair!" The little girl looked sad and I felt kinda bad for her


I agree, as much as humanly possible, to avoid my role in the edit warring.  Candidly, your answer to my question was a bit fuzzy, but I get your point that what qualifies as a 'revert' (any number) or as edit warring is in the judgment of the beholder.  So yes, I agree to be extremely cautious about the gray line between good faith editing and reverts/edit warring.   Unfortunately with articles that involve a high degree of emotions, like those associated with gun politics, tempers rise, and Yaf in the past has called my good faith edits to be reverts, and when I try to take it to the talk page, then stonewalling the talk page.   I have tried WP:DR in the past with Yaf, and it failed.    Check my edit history, I believe you would agree that I have in the past and will continue in the future to exceedingly patient and   remained civil in difficult editing environments.