Question: How is situational possibility expressed in the <LANGUAGE> language?

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs; The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions; The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs or with verbal constructions, but with other kinds of markers

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions

The language can express situational possibility with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express situational possibility with affixes on verbs, but with verbal constructions


Question: How is epistemic possibility expressed in the <LANGUAGE> language?

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions; The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs; The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language can express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions or with affixes on verbs, but with other kinds of markers

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs

The language cannot express epistemic possibility with verbal constructions, but with affixes on verbs


Overlap between Situational and Epistemic Modal Marking

Question: Can the same markers express both situational and epistemic modality in the <LANGUAGE> language?

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity; The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, but only for possibility or for necessity; The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, but only for possibility or for necessity

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, but only for possibility or for necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, both for possibility and necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality

The language has markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality, but only for possibility or for necessity

The language has no markers that can code both situational and epistemic modality


Question: What are the semantic distinctions of evidentiality in the <LANGUAGE> language?

No grammatical evidentials; Only indirect evidentials; Both direct and indirect evidentials


Question: How is evidentiality coded in the <LANGUAGE> language?

No grammatical evidentials; Verbal affix or clitic; Part of the tense system; Separate particle; Modal morpheme; Mixed systems


Suppletion According to Tense and Aspect

Question: How is suppletion based on tense or aspect expressed in the <LANGUAGE> language?

Suppletion according to tense; Suppletion according to aspect; Suppletion in both tense and aspect; No suppletion in tense or aspect


Suppletion in Imperatives and Hortatives

Question: How is suppletion in imperative and hortative forms expressed in the <LANGUAGE> language?

A regular and a suppletive form alternate; Imperative; Hortative; Imperative and Hortative; None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

A regular and a suppletive form alternate

A regular and a suppletive form alternate

A regular and a suppletive form alternate

A regular and a suppletive form alternate

A regular and a suppletive form alternate

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

A regular and a suppletive form alternate

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

A regular and a suppletive form alternate

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

A regular and a suppletive form alternate

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)

None (= no suppletive imperatives reported in the reference material)


Question: How is verbal number expressed in the <LANGUAGE> language?

No singular-(dual)-plural pairs/triples; Singular-plural pairs, no suppletion; Singular-plural pairs, suppletion; Singular-dual-plural triples, no suppletion; Singular-dual-plural triples, suppletion


Question: What is the order of subject, object and verb in the <LANGUAGE> language?

Subject-object-verb; Subject-verb-object; Verb-subject-object; Verb-object-subject; Object-verb-subject; Object-subject-verb; Lacking a dominant word order


Languages with two Dominant Orders of Subject, Object, and Verb

Question: Does the <LANGUAGE> language have two dominant orders of subject, object and verb?

Subject-object-verb or Subject-verb-object; Verb-subject-object or Verb-object-subject; Subject-verb-object or Verb-subject-object; Subject-verb-object or Verb-object-subject; Subject-object-verb or Object-verb-subject


Question: What is the order of subject and verb in the <LANGUAGE> language?

Subject precedes verb; Subject follows verb; Both orders with neither order dominant


Question: What is the order of object and verb in the <LANGUAGE> language?

Object precedes verb; Object follows verb; Both orders with neither order dominant


Question: What is the order of object, oblique and verb in the <LANGUAGE> language?

Verb-object-oblique; Oblique-verb-object; Oblique-object-verb; Object-oblique-verb; Object-verb-oblique; More than one order with none dominant


Question: What is the order of adposition and noun phrase in the <LANGUAGE> language?

Postpositions; Prepositions; Inpositions; More than one adposition type with none dominant; No adpositions


Question: What is the order of genitive and noun in the <LANGUAGE> language?

Genitive-noun; Noun-genitive; Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant

Both orders occur with neither order dominant


Question: What is the order of adjective and noun in the <LANGUAGE> language?

Modifying adjective precedes noun; Modifying adjective follows noun; Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant; Adjectives do not modify nouns, occurring as predicates in internally headed relative clauses

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant

Both orders of noun and modifying adjective occur, with neither dominant


Question: What is the order of demonstrative and noun in the <LANGUAGE> language?

Demonstrative word precedes noun; Demonstrative word follows noun; Demonstrative prefix on noun; Demonstrative suffix on noun; Demonstrative simultaneously before and after noun; Two or more of above types with none dominant

Two or more of above types with none dominant

Two or more of above types with none dominant

Two or more of above types with none dominant

Two or more of above types with none dominant

Two or more of above types with none dominant

Two or more of above types with none dominant

Two or more of above types with none dominant

Two or more of above types with none dominant

Two or more of above types with none dominant

Two or more of above types with none dominant

Two or more of above types with none dominant

Two or more of above types with none dominant

Two or more of above types with none dominant

Two or more of above types with none dominant

Two or more of above types with none dominant

Two or more of above types with none dominant

Two or more of above types with none dominant

Two or more of above types with none dominant

Two or more of above types with none dominant

Two or more of above types with none dominant

Two or more of above types with none dominant

Two or more of above types with none dominant


Question: What is the order of numeral and noun in the <LANGUAGE> language?

Numeral precedes noun; Numeral follows noun; Both orders of numeral and noun with neither order dominant; Numeral only modifies verb

Both orders of numeral and noun with neither order dominant

Both orders of numeral and noun with neither order dominant

Both orders of numeral and noun with neither order dominant


Question: What is the order of relative clause and noun in the <LANGUAGE> language?

Relative clause follows noun; Relative clause precedes noun; Internally-headed relative clause; Correlative relative clause; Adjoined relative clause; Double-headed relative clause; Mixed types of relative clause with none dominant

Mixed types of relative clause with none dominant

Mixed types of relative clause with none dominant


Question: Where do prenominal relative clauses appear relative to the noun in the <LANGUAGE> language?

Relative clause-noun dominant; Relative clause-noun or noun-relative clause; Relative clause-noun or internally headed; Relative clause-noun or correlative; Relative clause-noun or double-headed


Question: Where do postnominal relative clauses appear relative to the noun in the <LANGUAGE> language?

Noun-relative clause dominant; Noun-relative clause or relative clause-noun; Noun-relative clause or internally headed; Noun-relative clause or correlative


Question: How are internally-headed relative clauses expressed in the <LANGUAGE> language?

Internally headed relative clause dominant; Internally headed or relative clause-noun; Internally headed or noun-relative clause; Internally-headed or correlative; Internally-headed or double-headed; Internally-headed occurs as nondominant type; Internally-headed exists


Question: How are correlative relative clauses expressed in the <LANGUAGE> language?

Correlative relative clause dominant; Correlative or relative clause-noun; Correlative or noun-relative clause; Correlative or internally-headed; Correlative or adjoined; Correlative as nondominant type; Correlative exists


Question: How are adjoined relative clauses expressed in the <LANGUAGE> language?

Adjoined relative clause dominant; Adjoined or correlative


Question: How are double-headed relative clauses expressed in the <LANGUAGE> language?

Double-headed dominant; Double-headed or relative clause-noun; Double-headed or internally headed; Double-headed as nondominant type


Question: What is the order of degree word and adjective in the <LANGUAGE> language?

Degree word precedes adjective; Degree word follows adjective; Both orders occur with neither order dominant


Question: Where are polar question particles positioned in the <LANGUAGE> language?

Question particle at beginning of sentence; Question particle at end of sentence; Question particle in second position in sentence; Question particle with other position; Question particle in either of two positions; No question particle

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle in either of two positions

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle in either of two positions

Question particle in either of two positions

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle in either of two positions

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle in either of two positions

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle in either of two positions

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle in either of two positions

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle in either of two positions

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle in either of two positions

Question particle in either of two positions

Question particle in either of two positions

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle in either of two positions

Question particle in either of two positions

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle in either of two positions

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle in either of two positions

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle in either of two positions

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence

Question particle at beginning of sentence