id
int64
4.13M
59.9M
origin_label
stringclasses
2 values
target_text
stringlengths
2.18k
9.71k
annotator_prediction
stringclasses
2 values
annotator_confidence
int64
1
5
7,228,944
lose
On information and belief, Defendants received some or all of the revenues from the sale of the products, goods and services advertised on Exhibit A, and Defendants profit and benefit from the sale of the products, goods and services advertised on Exhibit A. Plaintiff did not give prior express invitation or perm...
lose
1
13,145,643
lose
a statement that the recipient is legally entitled to opt-out of receiving future faxed advertisements – knowing that he or she has the legal right to request an opt-out gives impetus for recipients to make such a request, if desired; On or about August 13, 2014, Defendants transmitted by telephone facsimile mac...
lose
1
8,138,726
win
Caduceus is an Occupational Medicine Practice with eight locations in Georgia. At all relevant times, Caduceus employed, and continues to employ, “Medical Assistants.” Caduceus employed Chavis as a “Medical Assistant.” Chavis regularly worked more than forty (40) hours in a workweek. Caduceus did not pay Cha...
win
1
18,623,509
win
Defendant Radius Agent develops software for real estate agents. One of their software programs, Radius Assist, generates leads for real estate agents by automatically sending out text messages. To advertise its software and demonstrate its functionality, Defendant used its software to automatically text thous...
lose
1
5,317,841
win
Defendant has employed in excess of 200 non-exempt Right of Way Agents who have been subject to the same policies (payment of day rate, no salary, non-payment of overtime despite having the primary duty of performing non-exempt work) at all times relevant to this matter (since May 2011). Defendant has violated §207(a...
lose
1
6,236,319
lose
TransUnion routinely reports information about tax liens on consumer reports and continues to report tax liens for a specified number of years after they have been paid, satisfied or released. On or about May 5, 2016, a Massachusetts state tax lien in the amount of $500 was entered against the property where P...
win
4
5,407,549
win
J.T.L. is a subscriber to and beneficiary of the Eaton Vance Management Health Benefit Plan. J.T.L. is an eight-year-old boy who has been diagnosed with autism by his treating physician. His treating physician referred J.T.L. to a Board Certified Behavior Analyst for clinical ABA therapy to treat his autism. ...
lose
3
4,322,202
win
Allegations concerning each Plaintiff are based on personal knowledge. All other allegations are based on investigation by Plaintiffs’ counsel. Plaintiffs propose a class consisting of: All residents of the United States who are members of the British Airways Executive Club, who purchased a Reward Ticket with fre...
win
1
7,701,378
win
Between November 2, 2017 and April 1, 2018, Peterson’s sent at least 5 texts to Plaintiff’s cellular phone number, from short code 599-25, without Plaintiff’s consent: Peterson’s unsolicited texts were a nuisance that aggravated Plaintiff, wasted his time, invaded his privacy, diminished the value of the cellular s...
win
1
7,272,347
lose
Violation of Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2310(d)(1) (On behalf of the Nationwide Class) 11. Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, comprising a Class and Subclass, which are defined as follows: a. ...
lose
3
6,642,888
lose
Defendants have been attempting to collect from plaintiff an alleged credit card debt incurred, if at all, for personal, family or household purposes and not for business purposes. The alleged original creditor was Credit One Bank, which is also part of the Sherman Financial Group. Credit One Bank reported the debt to...
win
1
4,276,476
win
Plaintiff brings this action individually and as a class action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 on behalf of all persons and/or entities that own AS&E common stock (the “Class”). Excluded from the Class are Defendants and their affiliates, immediate families, legal representatives, heirs, successors or ass...
lose
3
14,731,134
win
Defendant owns and operates a telecommunication company that specializes in selling minutes for overseas phone calls. Plaintiff himself was sent at least two marketing text messages without his express written consent. Below is a depiction of an actual text message received by Plaintiff from Defendant: Def...
win
2
4,524,761
lose
Plaintiff Stancu was hired by Defendant Ethos in or around September of 2015. Plaintiff Stancu was required to perform all relevant tasks in the front of the restaurant including acting as a bartender, waiter, busser and food runner. He also cleaned and stocked the bar and kitchen. Plaintiff worked hard and ...
win
4
16,694,791
lose
On or about January 16, 2019, Plaintiff responded to Defendant’s text messages with the word “Stop” as shown below, “Stop” was the “opt-out” preference provided by Defendant in its text messages: Defendant’s text messages constitute telemarketing and advertising because they promote Defendant’s business, goods a...
win
3
17,335,248
lose
The amount of the debt; Plaintiff brings this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). The identities of all class members are readily ascertainable from the records of Defendants and those companies and entities on whose behalf they attempt to collect and/or have ...
lose
1
16,094,926
lose
Defendant Exit Realty is a real estate agent or brokerage. Defendant John Doe 1 is an authorized agent of Defendant Exit Realty. As a way to cut corners yet also increase its advertising reach, Defendant and its authorized agents, including John Doe 1, repeatedly called thousands of cellular and residential pho...
win
4
4,516,603
lose
On information and belief, on or about March 14, 2011, April-May, 2012, May 10, 2012, October 19, 2012, September 30, 2013 and October 8, 2013, Defendants transmitted by telephone facsimile machine seven (7) unsolicited advertisements to Plaintiff. Copies of the facsimiles are attached hereto as Exhibit A. Plai...
win
1
13,452,001
win
Defendant has been sending repeated, unsolicited marketing text messages to the Plaintiffs’ cellular telephone numbers, XXX-XXX-8117 (Huron), and XXX-XXX-2457 (Wright). True and correct copies of some of the text messages received by Plaintiffs from Defendant are produced below: Defendant’s text messages to Pl...
lose
1
16,964,613
lose
) Defendants allege Plaintiff owes a debt (“the alleged Debt”). The alleged Debt is an alleged obligation of Plaintiff to pay money arising out of a transaction in which the money, property, insurance, or services which are the subject of the transaction are primarily for personal, family, or household purpos...
lose
1
6,176,993
win
(Plaintiff Individually and on Behalf of All Similarly Situated Employees Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §216) (Rule 23 Claim) Plaintiff and other similarly situated current and former employees in the asserted class regularly worked over 40 hours per week and earned the additional $1.25 per hour shift differential. ...
lose
1
17,115,352
lose
During Plaintiffs’ employment as Field Service Engineers, Defendant paid Plaintiffs and other Field Service Engineers on a salary basis and classified them as exempt under the FLSA. Defendant has employed, on average, six (6) or so Field Service Engineers at any given time over the last three (3) years. Defen...
lose
1
16,920,519
lose
At all times relevant, Plaintiff was the sole operator, possessor, and subscriber of the number ending in 5290. At all times relevant, Plaintiff’s number ending in 5290 was assigned to a cellular telephone service as specified in 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A)(iii). Plaintiff applied for and received a Mastercard is...
win
2
4,511,944
win
Plaintiff is not a customer of Verde. Plaintiff has not sought Verde’s services online or otherwise. On or around September of 2015, Verde began calling Plaintiff’s cellular telephone, number 413-xxx-4923. Verde called Plaintiff from telephone number 978-253-4077. At all times mentioned herein, Verde cont...
lose
1
16,688,988
win
Plaintiffs and those they seek to represent in this action were employed to perform work on various jobs for Defendant as part of its contracting business. Defendant paid Plaintiffs and those they seek to represent “straight time”—i.e., the same hourly wage for every hour worked, regardless of whether such hours ...
win
4
6,158,776
lose
Identify that the call was an attempt to collect a debt; The message did not identify that the call was an attempt to collect a debt, that any information obtained will be used for that purpose, or that the communication was from a debt collector. Upon information and belief, that same day DEFENDANT also left t...
win
3
14,493,636
win
The amount of the debt; Plaintiffs bring this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). The Class consists of: a. all individuals with addresses in the State of Texas; b. to whom Defendant Law Offices sent an initial collection letter attempting to collect a consu...
win
4
4,401,433
lose
Plaintiff brings this action on his own behalf and as a class action pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on behalf of all holders of Dawson common stock who are being and will be harmed by Defendants’ actions described below (the “Class”). Excluded from the Class are Defendants herein and a...
lose
4
4,236,109
win
Plaintiff desires to attend the aqua classes at the Sunrise, Florida location. Plaintiff previously explained to Defendant’s personnel at the front desk that her PCA is required in order to assist her in getting dressed prior to and after the aqua class in the locker room. Plaintiff is partially paralyzed in her l...
win
5
17,436,216
win
Defendant owns and operates a restaurant known as Bluefin Bar & Grill. Defendant employs several servers, bartenders, hosts, bussers, and runners. As a server, Plaintiff was responsible for serving food and beverages, explaining the menu and taking orders from guests, and adhering to company standards for food ...
win
3
6,170,206
lose
Monsanto is one of the world’s largest agricultural companies, and has long been manufacturing and selling herbicides to control weeds. Monsanto’s leading herbicide is called Roundup, whose active ingredient is called glyphosate. Monsanto first introduced Roundup in the mid-1970s for the agricultural community, and...
lose
3
4,496,582
win
At all times relevant, Plaintiff was a citizen of the State of California. Plaintiff is, and at all times mentioned herein was, “persons” as defined by 47 Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated (“the Class”). Plaintiff represents, and is a member of, the Cla...
lose
3
4,571,978
lose
Upon information and belief, other similarly situated employees are also uniformly paid in a fashion similar to Plaintiff and not compensated for the expenses associated with performing their job duties. As a matter of economic reality, DoorDash advertises, on the "About Us" section of its website, that "through...
lose
4
14,883,165
lose
The Class Period begins on March 27, 2015. On that date, Care.com filed on Form 10-K with the SEC its annual report for the period ended December 27, 2014, which stated in pertinent part: We have invested in building a differentiated member experience for finding and managing care. This investment includes the ong...
lose
4
6,290,416
lose
At no time was plaintiff liable for Morrison’s “seizure” or “service” fees, or for “towing” or “storage” charges, since none of said fees had been approved by the Newton District Court. Morrison misrepresented the amount of the debt in violation of 15 U.S.C. §1692e(2)(A). The allegations of paragraphs 1 – 14...
lose
3
8,164,812
win
Plaintiff Gellatly has visited Defendant’s facilities at 1467 S Arlington Street, Akron, OH; 716 E Market Street, Akron, OH; 117 S Walnut Street, Ligonier, PA, including within the last year. Additionally, Plaintiff Nario-Redmond has visited Defendant’s facilities at 3709 W Dublin Grandville Road, Columbus, OH; 14...
lose
3
7,387,410
lose
(Conversion) (Private Nuisance) (Trespass to Chattels) (Violations of the TCPA) On or about April 16, 2018 and May 1, 2018, Plaintiff received the unsolicited fax advertisements attached as Exhibit A on its facsimile machine # 212-960-8745. Discovery may reveal the transmission of additional faxes as well. ...
win
3
17,090,762
lose
(All Plaintiffs individually and on behalf of the FLSA collective v. All Defendants) (All Plaintiffs individually and on behalf of the FLSA collective v. All Defendants) (Plaintiff Muhammad on behalf of himself and similarly-situated officers v. All Defendants) This is a collective action brought under the Fair L...
win
3
59,723,155
win
Plaintiff brings this claim on behalf of the following class, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). The identities of all class members are readily ascertainable from the records of Defendants and those companies and entities on whose behalf they attempt to collect and/or have purchased debts. Excluded...
lose
3
17,409,093
win
(Fair Labor Standards Act - Unpaid Overtime) (NJWHL/NJWPL- Unpaid Overtime) The claims in this Complaint arising out of the FLSA, New Jersey Wage and Hour Law and New Jersey Wage and Payment Law are brought by Plaintiff under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on behalf of himself and of a class c...
lose
4
18,372,176
win
Plaintiff brings this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). The Class consists of: a. all individuals with addresses in the State of Virginia; b. to whom Defendant MLR sent an initial collection letter attempting to collect a consumer debt; c. that falsely and...
win
4
6,331,203
lose
Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to Rule 23, FRCivP, as a class action for himself and as representative of and for, and on behalf of, all other similarly situated persons ("Class Members"). The Class Members are defined as participants in EMSA’s Utility Fee Program from 2008 through 2013 who were detrimentall...
win
4
18,694,402
lose
Plaintiff brings this claim on behalf of the following class, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). The Class consists of: a. all individuals with addresses in the state of New York; b. to whom Defendant EOS sent a collection letter; c. On behalf of Defendant US Asset; d. attempting to collect a con...
win
4
16,610,350
win
The exact number of FLSA Collective members is unknown to plaintiffs at this time, but there are believed to be at least 25 such persons who have been victims of defendants’ common policy and practices that have violated their rights under the FLSA by willfully denying them overtime pay and other wages. The id...
win
4
59,753,915
win
Plaintiff repeats, reiterates and incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs above herein with the same force and effect as if the same were set forth at length herein. Plaintiff brings this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). The identities of all c...
win
4
8,138,535
lose
Plaintiff received a series of automated calls on his cell phone seeking to sell him life insurance including at least the following: August 11, 2016, at 11.04 am from 978-213-8332 (Exhibit A); a. August 10, 2016, at 9.52 am from 517-208-0209 (Exhibit B); b. August 10, 2016 at 11.43 am from 952-777-1698 (Exhibit C); c....
lose
3
14,541,926
lose
(42 U.S.C. § 1983; Violation of the Help America Vote Act Against Defendants Reagan, Maricopa County, and Fontes) (42 U.S.C. § 1983; Violation of Article I, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution Against Defendants Reagan, Maricopa County, and Fontes) (42 U.S.C. § 1983; Violation of the National Voter Registration A...
win
4
29,108,983
win
Plaintiffs bring this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). The identities of all class members are readily ascertainable from the records of Defendant and those companies and entities on whose behalf they attempt to collect and/or have purchased debts. Exclude...
win
3
17,283,150
lose
Plaintiff brings this action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 on behalf of a proposed class defined as: Plaintiff and all persons within the United States, within the four years immediately preceding the filing of this Complaint, Defendant or some person acting on Defendant’s behalf sent a text message to their cellular ...
lose
3
17,219,883
win
Upon information and belief, the individual identified in the above prerecorded messages is Armando Tello, one of the general managers of South Houston Nissan. The prerecorded telemarketing call was transmitted to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone, and within the time frame relevant to this action. Defendant’...
win
3
14,970,892
win
(Willful and Knowing Violation of 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq. – Telephone Consumer Protection Act) (on behalf of Plaintiff and the Class) In early 2018, Nelly Garcia provided her cellular telephone number to Fashion Nova when she purchased clothing items at its website. On or about June 20, 2018 at approximately...
lose
3
6,788,590
win
(Fair Labor Standards Act Violations) (Violations of Ohio Revised Code 4111.03) Defendant Larchwood Health Group LLC d/b/a Larchwood Village Retirement Community is an assisted living facility/nursing home. Plaintiff was employed by Defendant as a State Tested Nurses Aide (“STNA”) between August 2017 and Sep...
lose
3
4,248,727
lose
(INDIVIDUAL AND COLLECTIVE ACTION CLAIMS) (INDIVIDUAL AND CLASS CLAIMS) (INDIVIDUAL AND CLASS CLAIMS) (DISPARATE TREATMENT AND DISPARATE IMPACT DISCRIMINATION) Dr. Ahad is female and a citizen of Pakistan. She is a member of protected classes, as recognized by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amen...
win
2
4,391,085
lose
24 Hour Fitness operates a chain of more than 400 fitness clubs in 18 states, including Texas. 24 Hour Fitness has 89 locations within the State of Texas currently registered with the Texas Secretary of State. 24 Hour Fitness has purported written contracts with its members for access to its health/fitness ...
win
2
59,942,126
win
Plaintiff received the subject text messages within this judicial district and, therefore, Defendant’s violation of the TCPA occurred within this district. The purpose of Defendant’s text message was to promote and advertise its restaurant. 12 . Upon information and belief, Defendant caused similar text message...
lose
1
59,875,491
win
The amount of the debt; Plaintiff brings this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). The Class consists of: a. all individuals with addresses in the State of New Jersey; b. to whom Defendant sent an initial collection letter; c. attempting to collect a consu...
win
3
4,150,319
lose
(BREACH OF IMPLIED WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE) (BREACH OF IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY) (BREACH OF EXPRESS WARRANTY) (VIOLATION OF MAGNUSON-MOSS WARRANTY ACT) Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of itself and as a class action, pursuant to the provisions of Rules 23(a), (b)(2), a...
lose
3
6,303,460
lose
13 20 24 PROPOSED CLASS 25 26 On January 5, 2018, Defendant transmitted a call to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone 14 number ending in 3092 (the “3092 Number”) and left the following prerecorded message on 15 Plaintiff’s phone: 16 ….your energy supply charges on your electric account. Please call 17 m...
lose
3
7,045,177
win
(VIOLATION OF THE FAIR STANDARDS ACT, FAILURE TO PAY OVERTIME) (On behalf of the Plaintiffs and the FLSA Collective) The named Plaintiffs and members of the proposed FLSA Collective and Rule 23 Class are individuals, who were, or are employed by the Defendant, as School Bus Drivers ("Employees"); and their job dut...
lose
3
6,132,898
win
At all times relevant, Plaintiff was a citizen of the State of California. Plaintiff is, and at all times mentioned herein was, “persons” as defined by Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated (“the Class”). Plaintiff represents, and is a member of, the Class...
lose
3
6,827,603
lose
(Against the Individual Defendants for Violations of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act) (Against All Defendants for Violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 Promulgated Thereunder) Plaintiff brings this class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 on behalf of herself and the other public sh...
win
3
4,192,985
lose
Defendants manufacture, distribute, market, and sell the IGF-1 Plus line of health supplements on a nationwide basis. Defendants presently offer six forms of the IGF-1 Plus products: (a) Super Max 200,000ng; (b) Maximum 100,000ng; (c) Ultra Plus 25,000ng; (d) Ultra 10,000ng; (e) Starter Plus 5,000ng; and (f) St...
lose
3
16,333,700
win
Plaintiffs have retained the services of the undersigned attorneys and are obligated to pay the undersigned a reasonable fee for their services. Plaintiffs demand a trial by jury on all claims alleged herein. Plaintiffs sue under Rule 23(a) and (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for violations of the W...
win
4
4,520,480
lose
Plaintiff brings claims, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (hereinafter “FRCP”) Rule 23, individually and on behalf of the following New York consumer class (the “Class”):  All New York consumers who were sent collection letters and/or notice from 3 Defendant attempting to collect an obligation owe...
lose
3
16,160,529
win
Plaintiff brings this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). The identities of all class members are readily ascertainable from the records of Defendants and those companies and entities on whose behalf they attempt to collect and/or have purchased debts. Exclud...
win
4
4,567,276
win
Market Volume Increases ......................................................................... 26  Relationship Between Secondary Market Trading and Primary Market Issuing ....................................................................................................... 29  Regulatory Changes ...............
lose
3
17,149,083
lose
As of May 31, 2019, more than 190,000 people had a South Carolina driver’s license under indefinite suspension for failure to pay traffic fines and fees pursuant to Section 56-25-20. South Carolina suffers from one of the highest poverty rates in the nation. According to 2017 U.S. Census estimates, South Carol...
lose
5
7,044,919
win
This Action is properly maintained as a class action. The Class is initially defined as:  All New Jersey consumers who were sent letters and/or notices from AUDIT SYSTEMS concerning a debt owed to PERSONAL SUPPORT MEDICAL SUPPLIERS, which included the alleged conduct and practices described herein.  The class ...
lose
2
7,643,082
win
Defendants are engaged in the petroleum industry. Particularly, they are a petroleum and fracking proppant distributor. Defendants are headquartered in Sandy, Utah, but operate at numerous fracking sites throughout the United States, including within the state of Texas and within this Judicial District. Defen...
win
3
17,238,085
win
Plaintiff worked as a Utilization Review Employee for Defendant within the last three years. Utilization Review Employees’ job duties were routine and rote and did not include the exercise of discretion and independent judgment with respect to matters of significance. Utilization Review Employees’ duties and re...
lose
2
17,105,550
lose
All prior paragraphs are hereby incorporation by reference as though each were fully set forth herein. Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to Rule 23(a) and 23(b)(1) and Rule 23(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated. Plaintiff’s class co...
lose
1
4,356,432
lose
Plaintiff brings this class action on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated under rules 23(a) and 23(b)(1)-(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Numerosity: The Classes are so numerous that joinder of all individual members in one action would be impracticable. The disposition of the individu...
lose
1
6,166,177
lose
In approximately early 2017, Plaintiff began receiving telephone calls on her cellular telephone number ending in 9464. These calls came from Defendants’ telephone number 1-800-228-7676. Defendants, as part of their “Dream Sweepstakes” promotion, place prerecorded telephone calls to individuals. These call...
lose
3
4,538,138
win
Plaintiff is, and at all times mentioned herein was, the subscriber of the cellular telephone number (715) 245-0640 (the "0640 Number"). The 0640 Number is, and at all times mentioned herein was, assigned to a cellular telephone service as specified in 47 U.S.C. § 227 (b )(1 )(A)(iii). Between in or about early ...
win
3
4,584,882
win
The Q50 is a luxury sedan that debuted in the United States in August 2013. Since then, it has become Infiniti’s best-selling vehicle in the United States. More than 40,000 Q50s have been sold in the United States since its introduction. This action is brought as a class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(...
win
3
8,385,853
win
In accordance with F.R.Civ.P. 23(b)(1), (b)(2) and (b)(3), plaintiff brings this class action pursuant to the JFPA, on behalf of the following class of persons: All persons who (1) on or after four years prior to the filing of this action, (2) were sent telephone facsimile messages of material advertising the commercia...
lose
2
14,757,956
lose
On or about February 15, 2019, Defendant caused the following automated text message to be transmitted to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone number ending in 1175 (“1175 Number”): Long codes work as follows: Private companies known as SMS gateway providers have contractual arrangements with mobile carriers to transmi...
lose
2
4,370,453
win
ERIC is the owner of commercial property located at 4600 Lancaster Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19131 (“Subject Property” or “Property”), as well as other commercial properties in Philadelphia and Pennsylvania (“ERIC Properties”). On or around January 25, 2012, Seneca issued Policy No. SSP1501079, an all-risk commercial p...
win
4
6,516,758
win
Plaintiff sent Defendant written communication dated August 7, 2012, and demanded that Defendant cease and desist from any and all further communications with Plaintiff. (See August 7, 2012 Correspondence, attached as Exhibit A). Defendant received Plaintiff’s cease and desist correspondence on August 14, 2012 ...
win
4
18,507,112
win
On or about August 14, 2020, Defendant caused a call with a prerecorded message to be transmitted to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone number ending in 9590 (the “9590 Number”). Because Plaintiff did not answer her telephone after it rang, a voicemail containing a prerecorded message was left on Plaintiff’s phone. ...
win
3
16,330,858
win
Defendant’s text messages were transmitted to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone, and within the time frame relevant to this action. Defendant’s text messages constitute telemarketing because they encouraged the future purchase or investment in property, goods, or services, i.e., selling Plaintiff group fitness cla...
win
4
6,084,483
win
Ms. Meadows files this case as an “opt-in” collective action, as is specifically allowed by the collective action provisions of the FLSA (See, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b)). For purposes of this action, the “relevant period” or “class period” is the period of time commencing on the date that is three years prior to the fil...
lose
3
59,874,136
win
Plaintiff had an account with AT&T Mobility. Thereafter, AT&T Mobility claimed Plaintiff incurred a debt of $82.42 (“the alleged Debt”). Defendant alleges Plaintiff owes a debt (“the alleged Debt”). The alleged Debt is an alleged obligation of Plaintiff to pay money arising out of a transaction in which t...
win
3
39,239,088
lose
Supercuts has over 2,700 salons across the U.S. that provide haircut services to consumers that are either corporate-owned or owned by a franchisee.3 As part of its business practice, Supercuts places solicitation text messages to consumers in order to solicit them to purchase haircutting services from Supercuts...
win
4
4,500,752
win
On or about December 24, 2015, Defendant sent a written communication to Plaintiff in connection with the collection of the Debt. A true and correct copy of the relevant page of the December 24, 2015 communication is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The December 24, 2015 communication was the first communication Pl...
lose
2
15,724,899
win
Plaintiffs bring this action individually, and on behalf of the following Pennsylvania state-wide class of similarly situated individualc;, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: All ind1v1duals who were employed by Defendants at "Han Dynasty of University City Inc." at 371 I Vlarket Street, ...
lose
3
59,250,880
lose
Ms. Haynes-Glenn also seeks to represent a subclass defined as all Class members who reside in New York who possess Laundry Cards that are maintained by Defendant (the “New York Subclass”). Members of the Class and New York Subclass are so numerous that their individual joinder herein is impracticable. On infor...
lose
1
8,028,958
lose
(Against the Individual Defendants for Violations of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act) (Against All Defendants for Violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 and 17 C.F.R. § 244.100 Promulgated Thereunder) Plaintiff brings this class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 on behalf of himself...
lose
4
6,827,115
win
(FMLA – Unlawful Disclosure of Medical Information) As to Plaintiff Melissa Wolfe 357. Plaintiff Melissa Wolfe realleges and incorporates by reference each allegation in the foregoing paragraphs as though fully set forth herein. 358. At all times relevant, Plaintiff Melissa Wolfe was “eligible” under the definit...
win
3
6,230,346
lose
Lyft is a $7.5 billion dollar transportation services company that develops, markets and operates the Lyft App. In order to maximize its efforts to market to potential drivers, upon information and belief, Lyft contracted with Jobcase to market its services to potential drivers like Plaintiff. Under the te...
win
3
6,249,109
lose
The Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. Although the precise number of Class members is known only to Defendants, Plaintiff upon information and belief asserts that the Class numbers in the hundreds, if not thousands. There are questions of law and fact common to the Class that pr...
lose
1
17,253,164
lose
Upon the opening of the account, Plaintiff was registered for Online Banking by providing his cellphone number as instructed by SunTrust. Shortly thereafter, Plaintiff began receiving text messages from SunTrust on his cellular phone. The Plaintiff’s cellular phone number is identified as 757-###-6812. ...
win
4
6,345,771
lose
At all times relevant herein, Defendant operated a willful scheme to deprive their ANCs and others similarly situated of overtime compensation. Plaintiff and the similarly situated individuals worked or work as ANCs or other job positions performing similar duties for Defendant. As ANCs, their primary job duty...
win
3
17,425,100
lose
Plaintiff repeats and realleges the foregoing paragraphs as if fully restated herein. 15 U.S.C. § 1692e provides, generally, that a debt collector may not use any false, deceptive, or misleading representation or means in connection with the collection of any debt. An overstatement of the amount of a debt is a fal...
lose
1
14,525,049
lose
Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each and every allegation contained in the preceding paragraphs as if set forth fully herein. Plaintiffs have a right against wealth-based detention. In the pretrial detention context, courts have regularly found that setting arbitrary monetary release conditions that exceed a...
lose
5
7,634,110
win
Tim Ables Trucking Company, LLC was established in 1988 and provides, among other things, frac sand and cement transportation services to the oil and gas industry throughout the State of Texas and New Mexico.2 To provide its services, Tim Ables employed (and continues to employ) numerous hourly paid workers—incl...
lose
1
16,729,910
win
Defendant Princess sent multiple unsolicited text messages to consumer phone numbers, regardless of whether they were registered on the DNC. Plaintiff Received Unsolicited Autodialed Text Messages to Her Cell Phone Despite Being on the DNC List Plaintiff Wammack’s cell phone number was registered on the DNC on...
lose
1
6,945,879
lose
Defendant Brake Check is a chain automotive repair shop for brake service, oil changes and alignment. 0 In order to perform their job duties, Plaintiff and the Class Members follow procedures that are outlined in Defendant’s manuals and guidelines and/or learned during training. It is Plaintiff’s understandi...
win
3
6,174,616
win
(Against All Defendants For Violations of Section 10(b) And Rule 10b-5 Promulgated Thereunder) (Violations of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act Against The Individual Defendants) Education Management Corporation is a publicly traded, for-profit education company. The company offers academic programs to students...
lose
1
15,683,492
win
(Breach of Express Warranty) (Breach of Implied Warranties) (Fraudulent Concealment) (Product Liability – Design Defect) (Violation of Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, 15 U.SC. § 2301, et seq.) (California Unfair Competition Law – Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq.) (Negligence) (Violation of Consume...
lose
2