text stringlengths 10 360 |
|---|
5- Post mortem report. |
blood started coming out. |
hence, these appeals. |
they have been proved. |
testatrix died on 10.03.2009. |
display D is produced. |
no action was taken. |
hence the present complaint. |
she identified the accused. |
no light was burning. |
Ravinder Singh was relocated. |
their appeals are dismissed. |
he supports his case. |
which have been raised. |
he examined the witnesses. |
then she reached Samastipur. |
Bageshwar Kunar died issueless. |
this is clearly impermissible. |
this leads to absurdity. |
sentence has been pronounced. |
both of them reported. |
9. application dismissed. |
it cannot be both. |
interim order is vacated. |
this is not unjoint. |
this is the man. |
the object was laudable. |
V. Sukhanpur 654. |
he retired on 30.4.1995. |
he retired on 31.03.1999. |
he got two children. |
which is not correct. |
this cannot be assessed. |
under the said notification. |
it is not acceptable. |
will that be just? |
we loved Lakshmana Singh. |
Suresh has falsely implicated. |
one who wants him. |
hence the trial proceeded. |
the appellant is acquitted. |
was he administered poison? |
Ex.2 supports his claim. |
the Prusadi Mandal died. |
Krishna had three sons. |
Bhambhu Thakur was informant-complainant. |
he had become suspect. |
one who sought Panchayat. |
who are formal witnesses. |
they were declared hostile. |
her husband was unconscious. |
he took him out. |
Narayan Baghbe had died. |
it was becoming worse. |
he is a neighbour. |
she later died allegedly. |
plaintiff No.1 was dead. |
he was closely related. |
he went after it. |
his father had died. |
he was kept away. |
hence, this appeal. |
writ petition is dismissed. |
no evidence is required. |
he is on bail. |
this leads to absurdity. |
his hand was broken. |
he went to Bhagalpur. |
five persons were killed. |
the trachea was congested. |
Arun is her nephew. |
hence, this appeal. |
the petition is dismissed. |
hence, this revision. |
the sides were dark. |
Ramzan was going along. |
they had returned home. |
her lips were swollen. |
the prayer was then. |
para 6 is contradictory. |
five persons were killed. |
he had occasional attacks. |
his behaviour was indifferent. |
he ordered an enquiry. |
the injured was unconscious. |
this appeal is allowed. |
the mouth was empty. |
the uteri was observant. |
there are several instances. |
it fulfils this expectation. |
it is set aside. |
they were living separately. |
Ext.3: first information. |
5. inquest report. |
OBC 148 91 115 109 |
Scheduled Tribe 148 44 45 |
Scheduled Caste - 3. |
Katihar 46 05 41 15 |
Bettiah 6 03 01 0103 |
Ext.5: formal FIR. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.