--- pretty_name: TextEdit-Bench license: mit task_categories: - image-to-image tags: - computer-vision - image-editing - benchmark configs: - config_name: default data_files: - split: train path: metadata.jsonl dataset_info: features: - name: original_image dtype: image - name: gt_image dtype: image - name: id dtype: int64 - name: category dtype: string - name: source_text dtype: string - name: target_text dtype: string - name: prompt dtype: string - name: gt_caption dtype: string ---
[Danni Yang](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=qDsgBJAAAAAJ&hl=zh-CN&oi=sra),
[Sitao Chen](https://github.com/fudan-chen),
[Changyao Tian](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=kQ3AisQAAAAJ&hl=zh-CN&oi=ao)
If you find our work helpful, please give us a ⭐ or cite our paper. See the InternVL-U technical report appendix for more details.
Text editing is a fundamental yet challenging capability for modern image generation and editing models. An increasing number of powerful multimodal generation models, such as Qwen-Image and Nano-Banana-Pro, are emerging with strong text rendering and editing capabilities.
For text editing task, unlike general image editing, text manipulation requires:
- Precise spatial alignment
- Font and style consistency
- Background preservation
- Layout-constrained reasoning
We introduce **TextEdit**, a **high-quality**, **multi-scenario benchmark** designed to evaluate **fine-grained text editing capabilities** in image generation models.
TextEdit covers a diverse set of real-world and virtual scenarios, spanning **18 subcategories** with a total of **2,148 high-quality source images** and **manually annotated edited ground-truth images**.
To comprehensively assess model performance, we combine **classic OCR, image-fidelity metrics and modern multimodal LLM-based evaluation** across _target accuracy_, _text preservation_, _scene integrity_, _local realism_ and _visual coherence_. This dual-track protocol enables comprehensive assessment.
Our goal is to provide a **standardized, realistic, and scalable** benchmark for text editing research.
---
## 🏆 LeadBoard
| Models | # Params | Real | Virtual | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OA | OP | OR | F1 | NED | CLIP | AES | OA | OP | OR | F1 | NED | CLIP | AES | ||
| Generation Models | |||||||||||||||
| Qwen-Image-Edit | 20B | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 5.72 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 5.21 |
| GPT-Image-1.5 | - | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 5.78 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.80 | 5.28 |
| Nano Banana Pro | - | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 5.79 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 5.28 |
| Unified Models | |||||||||||||||
| Lumina-DiMOO | 8B | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.69 | 5.53 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.72 | 4.76 |
| Ovis-U1 | 2.4B+1.2B | 0.40 | 0.37 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.72 | 5.32 | 0.37 | 0.40 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.33 | 0.75 | 4.66 |
| BAGEL | 7B+7B | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.74 | 5.71 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.78 | 5.19 |
| InternVL-U | 2B+1.7B | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 5.70 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 5.12 |
| Models | # Params | Real | Virtual | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA | TP | SI | LR | VC | Avg | TA | TP | SI | LR | VC | Avg | ||
| Generation Models | |||||||||||||
| Qwen-Image-Edit | 20B | 0.92 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.57 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.57 | 0.79 | 0.92 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.77 |
| GPT-Image-1.5 | - | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.86 | 0.80 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.82 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.91 | 0.87 | 0.90 |
| Nano Banana Pro | - | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.87 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.89 | 0.92 |
| Unified Models | |||||||||||||
| Lumina-DiMOO | 8B | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.08 |
| Ovis-U1 | 2.4B+1.2B | 0.31 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.31 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.19 |
| BAGEL | 7B+7B | 0.68 | 0.60 | 0.38 | 0.35 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.38 | 0.51 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.42 | 0.54 |
| InternVL-U | 2B+1.7B | 0.94 | 0.90 | 0.71 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.91 | 0.82 | 0.62 | 0.83 |
| Models | # Params | Real | Virtual | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OA | OP | OR | F1 | NED | CLIP | AES | OA | OP | OR | F1 | NED | CLIP | AES | ||
| Generation Models | |||||||||||||||
| Qwen-Image-Edit | 20B | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 5.81 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.80 | 5.27 |
| GPT-Image-1.5 | - | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 5.85 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.80 | 5.32 |
| Nano Banana Pro | - | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 5.86 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 5.32 |
| Unified Models | |||||||||||||||
| Lumina-DiMOO | 8B | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.70 | 5.58 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.73 | 4.87 |
| Ovis-U1 | 2.4B+1.2B | 0.37 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.33 | 0.72 | 5.39 | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.33 | 0.74 | 4.75 |
| BAGEL | 7B+7B | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.74 | 5.79 | 0.53 | 0.58 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 0.78 | 5.25 |
| InternVL-U | 2B+1.7B | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 5.79 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 5.14 |
| Models | # Params | Real | Virtual | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA | TP | SI | LR | VC | Avg | TA | TP | SI | LR | VC | Avg | ||
| Generation Models | |||||||||||||
| Qwen-Image-Edit | 20B | 0.93 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.55 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.60 | 0.82 | 0.91 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.76 |
| GPT-Image-1.5 | - | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.83 | 0.88 |
| Nano Banana Pro | - | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.87 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.92 |
| Unified Models | |||||||||||||
| Lumina-DiMOO | 8B | 0.16 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.10 |
| Ovis-U1 | 2.4B+1.2B | 0.29 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.20 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.16 | 0.35 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.22 |
| BAGEL | 7B+7B | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.38 | 0.34 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.36 | 0.52 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.40 | 0.54 |
| InternVL-U | 2B+1.7B | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.90 | 0.78 | 0.57 | 0.79 |
## Citation
If you find TextEdit Bench useful, please cite our technical report InternVL-U using this BibTeX.
```
@article{tian2026internvlu,
title={InternVL-U: Democratizing Unified Multimodal Models for Understanding, Reasoning, Generation and Editing},
author={Changyao Tian and Danni Yang and Guanzhou Chen and Erfei Cui and Zhaokai Wang and Yuchen Duan and Penghao Yin and Sitao Chen and Ganlin Yang and Mingxin Liu and Zirun Zhu and Ziqian Fan and Leyao Gu and Haomin Wang and Qi Wei and Jinhui Yin and Xue Yang and Zhihang Zhong and Qi Qin and Yi Xin and Bin Fu and Yihao Liu and Jiaye Ge and Qipeng Guo and Gen Luo and Hongsheng Li and Yu Qiao and Kai Chen and Hongjie Zhang},
year={2026},
eprint={2603.09877},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CV},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09877}
}
```