prompt
listlengths 1
1
| images
listlengths 1
3
| data_source
stringclasses 1
value | reward_model
dict | extra_info
dict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nExplain how to: How to Make an Origami Rose\n\n## Response A:\n[Step 1] How to Make an Origami RoseI show how to make a fairly easy origami rose, there are only a few difficult parts. I would say it is of intermediate difficulty. All you need is a square piece of paper, in any color you want. The dimensions of the paper I used in the post and video were 21.5cm x 21.5cm for the large rose and 6cm x 6cm for the small one this fits inside the large rose. These can make a great romantic gift for a partner or friend and is perfect for any situation that would require roses. You can use colored paper to make any color or origami rose you want. There are many different versions of an origami rose but I like this one because it looks pretty good and can be made pretty quickly after some practice.\n\n[Image 1]\n\n[Step 2] InstructionsThis video shows the entire process that is outlined below.\n\n[Image 2]\n\n[Step 3] - Start with a square piece of paper. - Fold in half diagonally, and then diagonally from the other corners.\n\n[Image 3]\n\n[Step 4] - Fold in half. - Fold in half from the other side. \n\n[Image 4]\n\n[Step 5] - Fold the corner with the fold down to the centerline creating two flaps. - Do the same to the other side. \n\n[Image 5]\n\n[Step 6] - Flip over. - Touch the point of the triangle to the bottom of the centerline but donβt fold. - Make a fold mark at the center. - Touch the point to the mark just made and make another mark. - Fold the tip to this mark and crease it well. \n\n[Image 6]\n\n[Step 7] - Unfold the paper. - The previous fold made a small square in the center of the paper. - Fold a corner up until you see the small square and make a pinch fold. - Then make a fold to the right of the center and leave the left unfolded. \n\n[Image 7]\n\n[Step 8] - Unfold. - Repeat this on all sides. - Mountain fold the small center square so it pops up. - Fold in half diagonally and push the center square in. \n\n[Image 8]\n\n[Step 9] - There should be two small flaps, one will fold to the left and one to the right. - Fold the crease lines on the top. - Open the paper and lie it flat. \n\n[Image 9]\n\n[Step 10] - Flip over. - Loosen the folds shown, this helps when they will be bent. - Fold the edge up to the spot like shown. - Make sure the other parts of the paper are bent down while the fold is made. - Fold the other sides in the same way. \n\n[Image 10]\n\n[Step 11] - Now push the sides into each other. - The center should twist and you can wrap the flaps around it making a cylinder shape. \n\n[Image 11]\n\n[Step 12] - Flip over. - You can straighten up the folds. - Open one of the flaps and fold like shown. - Now fold at the crease line made earlier and fold this bit behind the flap. - Do the same to the other three flaps. \n\n[Image 12]\n\n[Step 13] - Push the flaps coming out of the tube down, you want them to interlock. - If you want a shorter rose push them in further. - The last flap should go under the first. - You can press around the flaps to make them stay in place better. \n\n[Image 13]\n\n[Step 14] - The folding is done, now the rose needs to be shaped. - You can use a pen to do this. - Give the center spiral more curve and press the center down a little. - For the petals open the side flaps as shown. - Depending on what you prefer, you can make the rose more open or less open. - It may take some practice to get a good looking rose. \n\n[Image 14]\n\n[Step 15] - You can also make a small rose to fit inside a larger one to give it a more realistic look. - The smaller rose is made in the same way. - The dimensions of the paper I used for the large rose are (21.5cm x 21.5cm) and the small rose to fit inside was (6.5cm x 6.5cm).\n\n## Response B:\n[Step 1] - Now push the sides into each other. - The center should twist and you can wrap the flaps around it making a cylinder shape. \n\n[Image 1]\n\n[Step 2] How to Make an Origami RoseI show how to make a fairly easy origami rose, there are only a few difficult parts. I would say it is of intermediate difficulty. All you need is a square piece of paper, in any color you want. The dimensions of the paper I used in the post and video were 21.5cm x 21.5cm for the large rose and 6cm x 6cm for the small one this fits inside the large rose. These can make a great romantic gift for a partner or friend and is perfect for any situation that would require roses. You can use colored paper to make any color or origami rose you want. There are many different versions of an origami rose but I like this one because it looks pretty good and can be made pretty quickly after some practice.\n\n[Image 2]\n\n[Step 3] - Flip over. - Loosen the folds shown, this helps when they will be bent. - Fold the edge up to the spot like shown. - Make sure the other parts of the paper are bent down while the fold is made. - Fold the other sides in the same way. \n\n[Image 3]\n\n[Step 4] InstructionsThis video shows the entire process that is outlined below.\n\n[Image 4]\n\n[Step 5] - Unfold. - Repeat this on all sides. - Mountain fold the small center square so it pops up. - Fold in half diagonally and push the center square in. \n\n[Image 5]\n\n[Step 6] - Start with a square piece of paper. - Fold in half diagonally, and then diagonally from the other corners.\n\n[Image 6]\n\n[Step 7] - Flip over. - You can straighten up the folds. - Open one of the flaps and fold like shown. - Now fold at the crease line made earlier and fold this bit behind the flap. - Do the same to the other three flaps. \n\n[Image 7]\n\n[Step 8] - You can also make a small rose to fit inside a larger one to give it a more realistic look. - The smaller rose is made in the same way. - The dimensions of the paper I used for the large rose are (21.5cm x 21.5cm) and the small rose to fit inside was (6.5cm x 6.5cm). \n\n[Image 8]\n\n[Step 9] - Fold the corner with the fold down to the centerline creating two flaps. - Do the same to the other side. \n\n[Image 9]\n\n[Step 10] - Fold in half. - Fold in half from the other side. \n\n[Image 10]\n\n[Step 11] - Flip over. - Touch the point of the triangle to the bottom of the centerline but donβt fold. - Make a fold mark at the center. - Touch the point to the mark just made and make another mark. - Fold the tip to this mark and crease it well. \n\n[Image 11]\n\n[Step 12] - Unfold the paper. - The previous fold made a small square in the center of the paper. - Fold a corner up until you see the small square and make a pinch fold. - Then make a fold to the right of the center and leave the left unfolded. \n\n[Image 12]\n\n[Step 13] - The folding is done, now the rose needs to be shaped. - You can use a pen to do this. - Give the center spiral more curve and press the center down a little. - For the petals open the side flaps as shown. - Depending on what you prefer, you can make the rose more open or less open. - It may take some practice to get a good looking rose. \n\n[Image 13]\n\n[Step 14] - There should be two small flaps, one will fold to the left and one to the right. - Fold the crease lines on the top. - Open the paper and lie it flat. \n\n[Image 14]\n\n[Step 15] - Push the flaps coming out of the tube down, you want them to interlock. - If you want a shorter rose push them in further. - The last flap should go under the first. - You can press around the flaps to make them stay in place better.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/comm_11534_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "interleaved",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "comm_11534",
"index": 5194
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nTell a visual story: Threads of Friendship\n\n## Response A:\n[Step 1] Against the backdrop of a tranquil setting, a woman in a yellow dress walked towards a welcoming abode. The scene exuded a sense of homecoming, with the promise of comfort and companionship awaiting her arrival.\n\n[Image 1]\n\n[Step 2] Within the cozy room, a man reached out to a surprised chicken, the simple act bringing a moment of unexpected joy. Eggs scattered on the floor spoke of life's messy beauty, while the man's gentle touch bridged the gap between man and nature.\n\n[Image 2]\n\n[Step 3] In another moment captured in time, the group of characters engaged in a lively conversation, surrounded by warmth and camaraderie. The varied ages melted away as they connected over a shared meal, creating memories that would last a lifetime.\n\n[Image 3]\n\n[Step 4] Against the backdrop of a bright yellow canvas, two objects stood as symbols of the characters' shared experiences. The black bag and the rectangular object represented the tangible memories that bound them together, a reminder of the journey they had embarked on.\n\n[Image 4]\n\n[Step 5] Amidst the shelves of the store, a man and a woman exchanged words and smiles. With kindness in his eyes, the man assisted the woman, guiding her towards a choice. Their interaction reflected the simple beauty of human connection.\n\n[Image 5]\n\n[Step 6] Once again, the group of characters gathered around the table, their laughter echoing in the air. Through shared moments and simple pleasures, they found comfort in each other's presence, united by the invisible threads of companionship.\n\n[Image 6]\n\n[Step 7] Under the watchful gaze of a woman with curly hair, three children absorbed knowledge under the open sky. Surrounded by nature, they learned and grew, each unique but bonded together in curiosity and wonder.\n\n[Image 7]\n\n[Step 8] In the bustling kitchen, a man shared a moment of culinary delight with two eager children. The aroma of baked goods filled the air, symbolizing the love and warmth that radiated from the heart of the home.\n\n[Image 8]\n\n[Step 9] On the wooden deck, animated characters embraced freedom and play. With laughter in the air, they found solace in each other's company, united by the shared joy of simple moments and carefree days.\n\n[Image 9]\n\n[Step 10] Around the table, five people shared a slice of cake, savoring the sweetness of togetherness. With a mixture of delight and anticipation in their eyes, they celebrated the bond that connected them, one bite at a time.\n\n[Image 10]\n\n[Step 11] As the sun dipped below the horizon, five animated characters gathered around a table, their laughter filling the air. From the young child to the elderly person, they shared food and stories, forming a bond that transcended age.\n\n## Response B:\n[Step 1] As the sun dipped below the horizon, five animated characters gathered around a table, their laughter filling the air. From the young child to the elderly person, they shared food and stories, forming a bond that transcended age.\n\n[Image 1]\n\n[Step 2] In another moment captured in time, the group of characters engaged in a lively conversation, surrounded by warmth and camaraderie. The varied ages melted away as they connected over a shared meal, creating memories that would last a lifetime.\n\n[Image 2]\n\n[Step 3] Amidst the shelves of the store, a man and a woman exchanged words and smiles. With kindness in his eyes, the man assisted the woman, guiding her towards a choice. Their interaction reflected the simple beauty of human connection.\n\n[Image 3]\n\n[Step 4] Under the watchful gaze of a woman with curly hair, three children absorbed knowledge under the open sky. Surrounded by nature, they learned and grew, each unique but bonded together in curiosity and wonder.\n\n[Image 4]\n\n[Step 5] Within the cozy room, a man reached out to a surprised chicken, the simple act bringing a moment of unexpected joy. Eggs scattered on the floor spoke of life's messy beauty, while the man's gentle touch bridged the gap between man and nature.\n\n[Image 5]\n\n[Step 6] On the wooden deck, animated characters embraced freedom and play. With laughter in the air, they found solace in each other's company, united by the shared joy of simple moments and carefree days.\n\n[Image 6]\n\n[Step 7] Against the backdrop of a tranquil setting, a woman in a yellow dress walked towards a welcoming abode. The scene exuded a sense of homecoming, with the promise of comfort and companionship awaiting her arrival.\n\n[Image 7]\n\n[Step 8] In the bustling kitchen, a man shared a moment of culinary delight with two eager children. The aroma of baked goods filled the air, symbolizing the love and warmth that radiated from the heart of the home.\n\n[Image 8]\n\n[Step 9] Around the table, five people shared a slice of cake, savoring the sweetness of togetherness. With a mixture of delight and anticipation in their eyes, they celebrated the bond that connected them, one bite at a time.\n\n[Image 9]\n\n[Step 10] Once again, the group of characters gathered around the table, their laughter echoing in the air. Through shared moments and simple pleasures, they found comfort in each other's presence, united by the invisible threads of companionship.\n\n[Image 10]\n\n[Step 11] Against the backdrop of a bright yellow canvas, two objects stood as symbols of the characters' shared experiences. The black bag and the rectangular object represented the tangible memories that bound them together, a reminder of the journey they had embarked on.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/comm_8357_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "interleaved",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "comm_8357",
"index": 538
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nCreate a step-by-step guide: Starting the Conversation of How to Approach Your Parents About Wearing Diapers for Bedwetting\n\n## Response A:\n[Step 1] Choose the right time. You don't want to talk to your parents when they're rushing out the door or trying to cook dinner. Rather, you need to pick a time when they have a chance to actually sit down and listen to you. The best way to figure out a good time is to simply ask them. You could say, \"Hey, Mom, I'd like to have a serious discussion with you. When can we sit down and talk?\" Don't put it off. Because you may feel embarrassed, you may be tempted to put off the conversation. However, the sooner you talk to your parents about it, the quicker you can get to a solution, such as wearing diapers to keep you dry at night.\n\n[Image 1]\n\n[Step 2] Have a practice discussion. Once you've figured out what you want to say, it's time to figure out how you want to say it. One way to do that is to practice the conversation. Take some time to write out exactly what you want to say, and try saying it out loud to a mirror. Start with the topic at hand: \"Mom and Dad, I still wet the bed, and I'd like to talk to you about wearing diapers.\" Move on to your feelings. You want to talk about your feelings and how that affects what you're saying: \"It's both frustrating and embarrassing to wake up wet in the middle of the night. I think diapers will help with this problem.\"\n\n[Image 2]\n\n[Step 3] Figure out what you're going to say. It's a good idea to think about what you're going to say ahead of time. That way, you'll be prepared for the conversation, and you won't be as nervous when it comes time to talk to your parents. It's a good idea to think about what you're feeling and how that can help you talk about what you want. For instance, if you're tired of wetting the bed, you may be feeling frustrated or embarrassed, and that can help you talk about why you want to wear diapers.\n\n[Image 3]\n\n[Step 4] Bring up the subject. You may want to get around saying it by bringing up other topics or going about it in a roundabout way. However, it's best to just let your parents know what's wrong, so you can get the help you need. If you aren't clear and direct about what you want, your parents may not understand. You could say, \"You may or may not know that I still wet the bed. It's become more of a problem for me. I'd like to start wearing diapers to help take care of the problem.\"\n\n## Response B:\n[Step 1] Figure out what you're going to say. It's a good idea to think about what you're going to say ahead of time. That way, you'll be prepared for the conversation, and you won't be as nervous when it comes time to talk to your parents. It's a good idea to think about what you're feeling and how that can help you talk about what you want. For instance, if you're tired of wetting the bed, you may be feeling frustrated or embarrassed, and that can help you talk about why you want to wear diapers.\n\n[Image 1]\n\n[Step 2] Have a practice discussion. Once you've figured out what you want to say, it's time to figure out how you want to say it. One way to do that is to practice the conversation. Take some time to write out exactly what you want to say, and try saying it out loud to a mirror. Start with the topic at hand: \"Mom and Dad, I still wet the bed, and I'd like to talk to you about wearing diapers.\" Move on to your feelings. You want to talk about your feelings and how that affects what you're saying: \"It's both frustrating and embarrassing to wake up wet in the middle of the night. I think diapers will help with this problem.\"\n\n[Image 2]\n\n[Step 3] Choose the right time. You don't want to talk to your parents when they're rushing out the door or trying to cook dinner. Rather, you need to pick a time when they have a chance to actually sit down and listen to you. The best way to figure out a good time is to simply ask them. You could say, \"Hey, Mom, I'd like to have a serious discussion with you. When can we sit down and talk?\" Don't put it off. Because you may feel embarrassed, you may be tempted to put off the conversation. However, the sooner you talk to your parents about it, the quicker you can get to a solution, such as wearing diapers to keep you dry at night.\n\n[Image 3]\n\n[Step 4] Bring up the subject. You may want to get around saying it by bringing up other topics or going about it in a roundabout way. However, it's best to just let your parents know what's wrong, so you can get the help you need. If you aren't clear and direct about what you want, your parents may not understand. You could say, \"You may or may not know that I still wet the bed. It's become more of a problem for me. I'd like to start wearing diapers to help take care of the problem.\"\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/comm_9053_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "interleaved",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "comm_9053",
"index": 3585
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Response A\n[Image 1]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nGenerate an image for: A forensic scientist examines a glass with a fingerprint in a lab with pixelated monitors showing fingerprints. Pixel art style, 8-bit colors.\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/open_img_prefs_4745_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/open_img_prefs_4745_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "t2i",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "open_img_prefs_4745",
"index": 13453
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_2>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n[Image 1]: Response A\n[Image 2]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nEdit instruction: Can you add penguin eyes to this image?\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/editreward_8079_input_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_8079_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_8079_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "editing",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "editreward_8079",
"index": 16178
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nCreate a step-by-step guide: Being a Good Student Inside the Classroom of How to Pass High School\n\n## Response A:\n[Step 1] Know the graduation requirements. Each school has a list of required classes that students must complete to graduate. This includes a certain number of classes of language arts, math, foreign languages, and even humanities. During your freshman year, find out what classes are required. Ask your teacher or guidance counselor for help on figuring out graduation requirements.\n\n[Image 1]\n\n[Step 2] Be involved in all your classes. Engaging in your classes helps you in a variety of ways. You get more out of your classes by participating, and you build better relationships with your teachers, which can help you in many ways in the long run. Stay awake in class and pay attention. Don't sleep in class or text your friends if you are bored. Sit in the middle of the room or towards the front. Sitting closer to the board and the teacher will help you focus and deter you from getting distracted by things like your cellphone, classmates, and letting your mind wander to other things.\n\n[Image 2]\n\n[Step 3] Don't skip class. Attendance is important. Every day you miss school, you are falling behind in the work in your classes. Regular attendance is essential for staying engaged in your classes. Most schools have an attendance policy. If you miss too many days, you may negatively impact your grade in classes or your graduation eligibility. Do miss school if you are very sick, like running a fever, vomiting, or have other medical issues. If you are arriving late to school because of lack of sleep, adjust your sleep schedule. A consistent sleep schedule will not only help your attendance, but also help you be more alert and engaged in class, and make it easier to learn.\n\n[Image 3]\n\n[Step 4] Ask questions. Don't worry about looking stupid in front of your class; raise your hand and ask the question. If you are struggling with something in class or from your homework, don't sit there confused. Answer questions when your teacher asks them. Do not be afraid to give the wrong answer; no one is right all the time. Participate in the class discussion. Use the main ideas, key words, and ideas you discovered in your readings or the class lessons. Offer insight or ideas when the teacher opens the class to student input.\n\n[Image 4]\n\n[Step 5] Know your strengths and weaknesses. High school is the time when you start discovering things about yourself. During the first two years of high school, begin understanding what your interests are, what your aspirations are, and what your future career plans might be.\n\n## Response B:\n[Step 1] Know your strengths and weaknesses. High school is the time when you start discovering things about yourself. During the first two years of high school, begin understanding what your interests are, what your aspirations are, and what your future career plans might be.\n\n[Image 1]\n\n[Step 2] Be involved in all your classes. Engaging in your classes helps you in a variety of ways. You get more out of your classes by participating, and you build better relationships with your teachers, which can help you in many ways in the long run. Stay awake in class and pay attention. Don't sleep in class or text your friends if you are bored. Sit in the middle of the room or towards the front. Sitting closer to the board and the teacher will help you focus and deter you from getting distracted by things like your cellphone, classmates, and letting your mind wander to other things.\n\n[Image 2]\n\n[Step 3] Ask questions. Don't worry about looking stupid in front of your class; raise your hand and ask the question. If you are struggling with something in class or from your homework, don't sit there confused. Answer questions when your teacher asks them. Do not be afraid to give the wrong answer; no one is right all the time. Participate in the class discussion. Use the main ideas, key words, and ideas you discovered in your readings or the class lessons. Offer insight or ideas when the teacher opens the class to student input.\n\n[Image 3]\n\n[Step 4] Know the graduation requirements. Each school has a list of required classes that students must complete to graduate. This includes a certain number of classes of language arts, math, foreign languages, and even humanities. During your freshman year, find out what classes are required. Ask your teacher or guidance counselor for help on figuring out graduation requirements.\n\n[Image 4]\n\n[Step 5] Don't skip class. Attendance is important. Every day you miss school, you are falling behind in the work in your classes. Regular attendance is essential for staying engaged in your classes. Most schools have an attendance policy. If you miss too many days, you may negatively impact your grade in classes or your graduation eligibility. Do miss school if you are very sick, like running a fever, vomiting, or have other medical issues. If you are arriving late to school because of lack of sleep, adjust your sleep schedule. A consistent sleep schedule will not only help your attendance, but also help you be more alert and engaged in class, and make it easier to learn.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/comm_7987_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "interleaved",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "comm_7987",
"index": 133
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Response A\n[Image 1]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nGenerate an image for: Shinto shrine portal, dark gate, magic door, pyromancer, vibrant anime colors, intricate details, swirling clouds, ethereal vines, dynamic swirls, Studio Ghibli style, magical architecture.\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/open_img_prefs_6540_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/open_img_prefs_6540_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "t2i",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "open_img_prefs_6540",
"index": 19106
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_2>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n[Image 1]: Response A\n[Image 2]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nEdit instruction: Make the background a tennis court.\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/editreward_14048_input_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_14048_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_14048_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "editing",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "editreward_14048",
"index": 9389
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_2>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n[Image 1]: Response A\n[Image 2]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nEdit instruction: Create a vibrant Tetris game with cascading social media icons.\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/editreward_21698_input_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_21698_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_21698_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "editing",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "editreward_21698",
"index": 6586
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Response A\n[Image 1]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nbig budget scifi movie set in postapocalyptic world with alien brainsuckers female cyborg in yellow rubber and gas mask in ruins of church\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/rapidata_11_441_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/rapidata_11_441_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "t2i",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "rapidata_11_441",
"index": 14928
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nIs the teenager having a haircut alone or do he has company, and if so who are with him?\n\n## Response A:\nThe teenager is not having a haircut alone; he has company. There are several people with him, including a man who is cutting his hair. The presence of multiple people in the scene suggests that it might be a social event or gathering, such as a party or a casual hangout. The man cutting the teenager's hair could be a friend, a family member, or a professional hairstylist. The other people in the scene might be there to socialize, support the teenager, or simply be present for the occasion. The presence of chairs in the scene also indicates that it is a comfortable and relaxed environment, which is conducive to socializing and spending time together.\n\n## Response B:\nBy analyzing the visual context of the image, a short and accurate answer to the question is Yes, John McCain is sitting while talking. . Because The man in front has his legs crossed on top of another chair which indicates that he ' s seated. He also appears to be speaking with someone else who isn't visible from this angle. There are two other people present as well. One person can be seen behind them wearing glasses. All three appear engaged in conversation together. It seems like they might be at an event or gathering where these conversations happen frequently. This could possibly involve political topics given their attire and professional appearance. However, it would require more information than what is provided by just looking at the photo alone for us to determine specifics about their roles or reasons for being there. In any case, all four individuals seem very comfortable around each other despite not knowing one another. They likely share common interests or affiliation based off their choice of clothing styles. Overall, it looks like a pleasant social interaction taking place between friends or colleagues. It may have been set up intentionally for networking purposes or simply coincidental. Regardless, it demonstrates how genuine connections can form even during un\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/llava_critic_5308_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "reasoning",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "llava_critic_5308",
"index": 12470
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Response A\n[Image 1]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nGenerate an image for: Vibrant anime cyborg ninja, blue and gold, with lily and clematis vines, sunflower, bright colors, dynamic background, sharp focus, anime style.\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/open_img_prefs_2944_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/open_img_prefs_2944_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "t2i",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "open_img_prefs_2944",
"index": 3165
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_2>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n[Image 1]: Response A\n[Image 2]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nEdit instruction: Add a united states flag pin to the man on the right.\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/editreward_18251_input_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_18251_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_18251_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "editing",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "editreward_18251",
"index": 2392
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nIdentify and describe each object in the image in detail.\n\n## Response A:\nIn the image, there is a young child wearing sunglasses and sitting on a motorcycle. The motorcycle has various parts such as handlebars, mirrors, and a headlight, which are essential components of this vehicle. The child seems to be dressed in a casual outfit suitable for an outdoor environment. There's also another person standing nearby, possibly overseeing or interacting with the child.\n\nThe scene takes place outdoors, suggesting that this might be a moment captured during a day trip, family gathering, or some other leisure activity where the child is getting familiarized with the motorcycle. The presence of the adult indicates supervision and safety measures being taken during this experience.\n\n## Response B:\nIn the image, there's a young child sitting on a motorcycle, wearing sunglasses and a jacket. The motorcycle has distinct features such as handlebars, mirrors, and a windshield. The scene takes place outdoors during daytime, with some people in the background and a street setting. The child seems to be posing or interacting with the motorcycle, giving a sense of adventure and exploration. The presence of the other people in the background suggests that this could be a casual gathering or event where the motorcycle is being showcased or displayed.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/rlaifv_15218_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "reasoning",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "rlaifv_15218",
"index": 8615
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nCan you point out the details that make this image unique?\n\n## Response A:\nThe image showcases a before and after transformation of a woman's eyebrows, highlighting the significant difference in appearance that can be achieved through eyebrow enhancement. The \"before\" photo displays the woman with more natural eyebrows, while the \"after\" photo reveals a transformed appearance with well-shaped eyebrows. This demonstrates the impact of professional eyebrow services provided by The Beauty Factory BF, as indicated by the hashtag \"#THEBEAUTYFACTORYBF.\"\n\n## Response B:\nThe image showcases a woman's face with different stages of eyelash extensions, including before and after. The collage format emphasizes the transformation in her appearance due to the application of the lash extensions. This highlights the effects of lash enhancement services offered by The Beauty Factory, as indicated by the text in the image.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/rlaifv_8714_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "reasoning",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "rlaifv_8714",
"index": 1807
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_2>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n[Image 1]: Response A\n[Image 2]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nEdit instruction: Replace the background of each slide with a watercolor painting of a serene Italian countryside.\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/editreward_19903_input_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_19903_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_19903_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "editing",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "editreward_19903",
"index": 13589
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nHow many chairs are in this pic?\n\n## Response A:\nThere are four chairs visible in the picture. They are arranged in a row against the wall on the left side of the image.\n\n## Response B:\nThere are three chairs in the picture.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/wildvision_2750_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "interleaved",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "wildvision_2750",
"index": 11199
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Response A\n[Image 1]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nThe flickering light bulb brightened the dark room and the dim hallway.\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/rapidata_23_313_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/rapidata_23_313_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "t2i",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "rapidata_23_313",
"index": 14242
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Response A\n[Image 1]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nA mechanical or electrical device for measuring time.\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/rapidata_9_11_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/rapidata_9_11_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "t2i",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "rapidata_9_11",
"index": 11968
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nwho made this wine?\n\n## Response A:\nThe wine in the image is made by Roger Sabon. Roger Sabon is a winery known for producing quality wines, particularly from the region of Provence in France.\n\n## Response B:\nThe wine in the image is made by Roger Sabon. Roger Sabon is a renowned winemaker from France, known for producing high-quality wines. The presence of this bottle suggests that the person enjoying the wine may appreciate fine wines or has an interest in French wines.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/rlaifv_18901_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "reasoning",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "rlaifv_18901",
"index": 17108
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nCreate a step-by-step guide: Method Two: Anime Eyes of How to Draw Eyes\n\n## Response A:\n[Step 1] Draw smaller oblongs inside the iris to make the pupils. Leave some space between the bottom of the pupils and the lower edge of the iris but make the top edges touch.\n\n[Image 1]\n\n[Step 2] Fill the lower portion of the iris with the color of your choice. Create extra highlights by drawing a U inside the colored space. The U should be lighter than the first color you used.\n\n[Image 2]\n\n[Step 3] Erase the guidelines and draw oblongs for the iris. They can be unevenly shaped.\n\n[Image 3]\n\n[Step 4] Create shadows underneath the upper eyelash. If you want to draw better read more about art. Do plenty of sketching. Find a good teacher in your area, who will help you to see what you are missing.\n\n[Image 4]\n\n[Step 5] Thicken the outline of the iris. Again, this doesnβt have to be perfectly done. Darken the insides of the pupils. Do not color the catchlight.\n\n[Image 5]\n\n[Step 6] Draw two slightly squished oblongs.\n\n[Image 6]\n\n[Step 7] Draw ovals to make the catchlights of your anime eyes.\n\n[Image 7]\n\n[Step 8] Instead of drawing the eyelashes hair by hair, anime lashes can be drawn by one very thick arc. Follow the guidelines to make the upper lash line and the thinner lower lashline.\n\n## Response B:\n[Step 1] Draw two slightly squished oblongs.\n\n[Image 1]\n\n[Step 2] Instead of drawing the eyelashes hair by hair, anime lashes can be drawn by one very thick arc. Follow the guidelines to make the upper lash line and the thinner lower lashline.\n\n[Image 2]\n\n[Step 3] Erase the guidelines and draw oblongs for the iris. They can be unevenly shaped.\n\n[Image 3]\n\n[Step 4] Draw smaller oblongs inside the iris to make the pupils. Leave some space between the bottom of the pupils and the lower edge of the iris but make the top edges touch.\n\n[Image 4]\n\n[Step 5] Draw ovals to make the catchlights of your anime eyes.\n\n[Image 5]\n\n[Step 6] Thicken the outline of the iris. Again, this doesnβt have to be perfectly done. Darken the insides of the pupils. Do not color the catchlight.\n\n[Image 6]\n\n[Step 7] Fill the lower portion of the iris with the color of your choice. Create extra highlights by drawing a U inside the colored space. The U should be lighter than the first color you used.\n\n[Image 7]\n\n[Step 8] Create shadows underneath the upper eyelash. If you want to draw better read more about art. Do plenty of sketching. Find a good teacher in your area, who will help you to see what you are missing.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/comm_4725_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "interleaved",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "comm_4725",
"index": 5277
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nWhat species is the bird that's observed in the image?\n\n## Response A:\nA crow is observed in the image. What type of bird is in the image? A crow. What color is the bird in the image? Black. What type of bird is visible in the image? A crow.\n\n## Response B:\nThe bird observed in the image is a black crow.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/llava_critic_11972_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "reasoning",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "llava_critic_11972",
"index": 2641
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nWho is wearing a shirt?\n\n## Response A:\nThe woman in the image is wearing a shirt. The shirt appears to be red in color, and it contrasts well against her skin tone. The shirt provides a visual element that adds depth to the composition of the picture.\n\n## Response B:\nThe woman in the photo is wearing a shirt. She appears to be dressed casually, likely getting ready for her day or engaging in daily activities such as brushing her teeth or preparing for work or school.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/rlaifv_5047_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "reasoning",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "rlaifv_5047",
"index": 8660
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nExplain how to: Wedding Cake Saw\n\n## Response A:\n[Step 1] Wedding Cake SawMany aspects of our wedding were made rather than bought, and one of the more unique items was our cake saw. Every time Katya and I went to a wedding, we both found the tradition of cutting the cake a little odd. The idea is that it is done together, but given the knife handle has space only for one hand only one person is really holding it. On top of that the fact that both bride and groom tend to use both hands means there is a strange looking pile of hands at the back of the knife. This is something that once you have spotted really stands out, so we agreed that we would do things differently. We figured that a miniature two man saw would allow us to use real team work to cut the cake. The only problem was how one goes about making such a thing. This was an important build so I teamed up with my best man to make it. Katya and I were both very happy with the result. We liked the way it was traditional with a twist.\n\n[Image 1]\n\n[Step 2] Get the Blade Laser CutI spent a lot of time trying to find a suitable blade off the shelf. Unlike a knife that can stop in the middle, the cake saw needs to be comfortably wider than the cake. I started looking for 20\" (50cm) knives but found only levelling knives are available in this sort of length and that the long ones are not serrated (beware stock images, I bought one pictured as serrated that wasn't when it arrived). Mark and I then searched for all sorts of wavy edged ninja swords, but nothing had the right look. In the end Mark persuaded me it would be easier to sharpen our own blade; he makes robots and knew how to get 1mm stainless plate laser cut cheaply. I sketched out what I was thinking, and we chose a tooth profile we thought we might be able to grind to a blade. The next thing I knew Mark had CADed it up and we had the part within a week.\n\n[Image 2]\n\n[Step 3] Wooden HandlesI had a think and a google to try to find a suitable idea for the handles. I decided I wanted an aged wood look, and after a bit of searching found a set of reclaimed file handles on ebay that were perfect. They have a hole into which the shank of the file fits (normally a tapered square section spike).\n\n[Image 3]\n\n[Step 4] Handle AdaptorsTo attach the handles to the saw, adapters were needed. The adapters have a squared spike to fit into the handle and a slot for the blade to slide into. Two holes through both sides of the slot line up with holes in the blade, allowing pins to be pressed in to hold the blade securely. These were made by turning round stainless bar, cutting a spike one end facing off the other end and adding a bevel and just neatening up the rest of the surface of the part. After turning, the spike was squared off using a coarse file. The holes were very carefully drilled to line up with the holes in the blade. The slot was sawn by hand again carefully to make it straight enough to fit the blade. Sand paper and needle files were used to get the slot wide enough to fit the blade. Care was taken when testing the fit to only slide them over the ends that would be covered once fitted anyway so as to avoid any visible scratches. \n\n[Image 4]\n\n[Step 5] Fitting the HandlesI decided to add one handle before grinding an edge on the blade so that I had something to hold it with. This was removed later for sanding the blade, but I have put the step in now so you know how to do it. Fitting the handles to the adaptors made in the previous step is relatively straightforward as long as you sized the spike correctly. Placing the point of the spike in the handle hole and pushing it in gets it most of the way, but to get it to stay there I recommend hitting it a few times with a soft mallet. Attaching the adaptor to the blade is a little harder. First you need to make some pins. We used 3mm stainless rod to fit our 3mm holes. As you might expect, once aligned these weren't going to stay put. Flexing of the joint would gradually walk them out of the hole. So in order to keep them in tightly we gave the pins a bit of a mullering to make them less circular. We whacked one end with a hammer and over tightened it in a vice to make it less circular. We also slightly bent the pin such that it could be pressed in but was held by the force of the adapter straightening it. Before fitting, the pins were filed round to the approximate curvature of the adaptor so they fit nicely once pressed in. Press the more circular end part way into the hole, with the end curvature aligned with the surface of the adaptor. Avoid pressing it too far, as the blade still needs to be slid into position. Carefully slide the blade into position, look through the holes in the back of the adaptor to align the blade holes. Once in position press the pins through further until they are flush with the surface. \n\n[Image 5]\n\n[Step 6] Grind an Edge on the BladeTo grind a sharp edge onto the blade, I mounted a Dremel on a work bench to sit through a cut out in some scrap wood. I adjusted the height to meet the blade at a shallow angle when placed on the wood. After making sure the Dremel was secure I spun it up and carefully ran the edge of the blade over the grinding bit one serration at a time. To keep everything even across the length of the blade I ground evenly across with multiple passes. The grinding stone will wear down during the process so the height may need adjusting. On the final pass, look out for the ground edge breaking through to the surface and try to keep the amount the edge recedes constant across the blade. There may be some burrs that need knocking off, but the blade should now be sharp. A standard sharpening steel can improve the edge further but I found this wasn't required. NOTE: From now on more care is needed handling the blade! \n\n[Image 6]\n\n[Step 7] Take the Handle Off and Sand and Polish the BladeUnfortunately, despite carefully cleaning the wood and blade before grinding, grit from the grinding bit got trapped under the blade as I moved it tracing multiple copies of the serration shape in the surface. In order to remove the marks I decided to remove the handle I had fitted to get better access for sanding. I used an M3 screw to press the pins out in order to remove the handle. I went through the grits from 80 to 1200 and then 40um 20um and 9um finishing film. This left a matt satin finish that was in keeping with the rustic saw look. When happy it is time to fit both handles again, the same way as before. \n\n[Image 7]\n\n[Step 8] Forming a Leather SheathI thought it would be nice to make a sheath for the cake saw, not least because it was big and sharp! I bought some thick tan leather. This is the first time I have worked with leather but I found it straightforward. I soaked it in a bucket of warm water for a couple of hours. I then folded it in half to get the main crease in, placed it wrapped in a bin liner under a bucket of water with a plank of wood to spread the load, and left it overnight. By the next day water had stopped dripping out so I relocated the leather from my bath to my garage and inserted the saw to form the leather around. I pressed the leather around the handle adaptors and used an old car battery on a plank with some absorbent padding to apply weight to the middle to get good creases around the ends of the saw, as well as to help dry it out. I left it for a couple more days; the leather took the form of the saw beautifully. \n\n[Image 8]\n\n[Step 9] Sewing the SheathOnce the sheath is formed to the shape of the saw it holds on quite well, but opens up at the ends. I did a neat line of stitches down either end to make it more secure. To do this I used a leather pin wheel to make some holes through the leather evenly along a line for stitching through. I found that any needle that would take my extra thick thread didn't fit through the holes so I widened them with a 0.9mm micro drill bit. After that stitching was much easier. Once stitched the saw fit was nice and secure. \n\n[Image 9]\n\n[Step 10] Cut Cake!Now the cake saw is finished, give it a good clean, bring it to a fancy venue and marry someone. Then you get to work with them to cut a cake with a saw!\n\n## Response B:\n[Step 1] Wedding Cake SawMany aspects of our wedding were made rather than bought, and one of the more unique items was our cake saw. Every time Katya and I went to a wedding, we both found the tradition of cutting the cake a little odd. The idea is that it is done together, but given the knife handle has space only for one hand only one person is really holding it. On top of that the fact that both bride and groom tend to use both hands means there is a strange looking pile of hands at the back of the knife. This is something that once you have spotted really stands out, so we agreed that we would do things differently. We figured that a miniature two man saw would allow us to use real team work to cut the cake. The only problem was how one goes about making such a thing. This was an important build so I teamed up with my best man to make it. Katya and I were both very happy with the result. We liked the way it was traditional with a twist.\n\n[Image 1]\n\n[Step 2] Wooden HandlesI had a think and a google to try to find a suitable idea for the handles. I decided I wanted an aged wood look, and after a bit of searching found a set of reclaimed file handles on ebay that were perfect. They have a hole into which the shank of the file fits (normally a tapered square section spike).\n\n[Image 2]\n\n[Step 3] Handle AdaptorsTo attach the handles to the saw, adapters were needed. The adapters have a squared spike to fit into the handle and a slot for the blade to slide into. Two holes through both sides of the slot line up with holes in the blade, allowing pins to be pressed in to hold the blade securely. These were made by turning round stainless bar, cutting a spike one end facing off the other end and adding a bevel and just neatening up the rest of the surface of the part. After turning, the spike was squared off using a coarse file. The holes were very carefully drilled to line up with the holes in the blade. The slot was sawn by hand again carefully to make it straight enough to fit the blade. Sand paper and needle files were used to get the slot wide enough to fit the blade. Care was taken when testing the fit to only slide them over the ends that would be covered once fitted anyway so as to avoid any visible scratches. \n\n[Image 3]\n\n[Step 4] Fitting the HandlesI decided to add one handle before grinding an edge on the blade so that I had something to hold it with. This was removed later for sanding the blade, but I have put the step in now so you know how to do it. Fitting the handles to the adaptors made in the previous step is relatively straightforward as long as you sized the spike correctly. Placing the point of the spike in the handle hole and pushing it in gets it most of the way, but to get it to stay there I recommend hitting it a few times with a soft mallet. Attaching the adaptor to the blade is a little harder. First you need to make some pins. We used 3mm stainless rod to fit our 3mm holes. As you might expect, once aligned these weren't going to stay put. Flexing of the joint would gradually walk them out of the hole. So in order to keep them in tightly we gave the pins a bit of a mullering to make them less circular. We whacked one end with a hammer and over tightened it in a vice to make it less circular. We also slightly bent the pin such that it could be pressed in but was held by the force of the adapter straightening it. Before fitting, the pins were filed round to the approximate curvature of the adaptor so they fit nicely once pressed in. Press the more circular end part way into the hole, with the end curvature aligned with the surface of the adaptor. Avoid pressing it too far, as the blade still needs to be slid into position. Carefully slide the blade into position, look through the holes in the back of the adaptor to align the blade holes. Once in position press the pins through further until they are flush with the surface. \n\n[Image 4]\n\n[Step 5] Get the Blade Laser CutI spent a lot of time trying to find a suitable blade off the shelf. Unlike a knife that can stop in the middle, the cake saw needs to be comfortably wider than the cake. I started looking for 20\" (50cm) knives but found only levelling knives are available in this sort of length and that the long ones are not serrated (beware stock images, I bought one pictured as serrated that wasn't when it arrived). Mark and I then searched for all sorts of wavy edged ninja swords, but nothing had the right look. In the end Mark persuaded me it would be easier to sharpen our own blade; he makes robots and knew how to get 1mm stainless plate laser cut cheaply. I sketched out what I was thinking, and we chose a tooth profile we thought we might be able to grind to a blade. The next thing I knew Mark had CADed it up and we had the part within a week.\n\n[Image 5]\n\n[Step 6] Take the Handle Off and Sand and Polish the BladeUnfortunately, despite carefully cleaning the wood and blade before grinding, grit from the grinding bit got trapped under the blade as I moved it tracing multiple copies of the serration shape in the surface. In order to remove the marks I decided to remove the handle I had fitted to get better access for sanding. I used an M3 screw to press the pins out in order to remove the handle. I went through the grits from 80 to 1200 and then 40um 20um and 9um finishing film. This left a matt satin finish that was in keeping with the rustic saw look. When happy it is time to fit both handles again, the same way as before. \n\n[Image 6]\n\n[Step 7] Cut Cake!Now the cake saw is finished, give it a good clean, bring it to a fancy venue and marry someone. Then you get to work with them to cut a cake with a saw!\n\n[Image 7]\n\n[Step 8] Forming a Leather SheathI thought it would be nice to make a sheath for the cake saw, not least because it was big and sharp! I bought some thick tan leather. This is the first time I have worked with leather but I found it straightforward. I soaked it in a bucket of warm water for a couple of hours. I then folded it in half to get the main crease in, placed it wrapped in a bin liner under a bucket of water with a plank of wood to spread the load, and left it overnight. By the next day water had stopped dripping out so I relocated the leather from my bath to my garage and inserted the saw to form the leather around. I pressed the leather around the handle adaptors and used an old car battery on a plank with some absorbent padding to apply weight to the middle to get good creases around the ends of the saw, as well as to help dry it out. I left it for a couple more days; the leather took the form of the saw beautifully. \n\n[Image 8]\n\n[Step 9] Grind an Edge on the BladeTo grind a sharp edge onto the blade, I mounted a Dremel on a work bench to sit through a cut out in some scrap wood. I adjusted the height to meet the blade at a shallow angle when placed on the wood. After making sure the Dremel was secure I spun it up and carefully ran the edge of the blade over the grinding bit one serration at a time. To keep everything even across the length of the blade I ground evenly across with multiple passes. The grinding stone will wear down during the process so the height may need adjusting. On the final pass, look out for the ground edge breaking through to the surface and try to keep the amount the edge recedes constant across the blade. There may be some burrs that need knocking off, but the blade should now be sharp. A standard sharpening steel can improve the edge further but I found this wasn't required. NOTE: From now on more care is needed handling the blade! \n\n[Image 9]\n\n[Step 10] Sewing the SheathOnce the sheath is formed to the shape of the saw it holds on quite well, but opens up at the ends. I did a neat line of stitches down either end to make it more secure. To do this I used a leather pin wheel to make some holes through the leather evenly along a line for stitching through. I found that any needle that would take my extra thick thread didn't fit through the holes so I widened them with a 0.9mm micro drill bit. After that stitching was much easier. Once stitched the saw fit was nice and secure.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/comm_9538_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "interleaved",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "comm_9538",
"index": 10784
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nCreate a step-by-step guide: Looking the Part of How to Become a Socialite\n\n## Response A:\n[Step 1] Dress simply and tastefully. Stick to classic, tried-and-true styles as you start making your way into the socialite scene. For women, you canβt go wrong with dark wash jeans or a βlittle black dress.β Men should stick with dark, fitted suits.\n\n[Image 1]\n\n[Step 2] Buy clothes that fit and flatter your shape. Gone are the days when you have to be stick-skinny to make your mark on high society! Dress to your body shape, avoiding shapeless dresses and T-shirts or jeans that cut off circulation or leave imprints on your hips. Choose clothes that fit your body and visit a tailor to ensure that your clothes fit to perfection.\n\n[Image 2]\n\n[Step 3] Invest in a few key accessories. A strand of pearls adds instant elegance to a womanβs style, while a well-chosen pocket square will add a classy dash of color to a manβs suit. A nice watch is always a solid addition to any outfit. Avoid gaudy, chunky, or flashy jewelry that calls attention to itself. As a socialite, youβre going for a tasteful, but understated look.\n\n[Image 3]\n\n[Step 4] Choose stylish shoes. Your clothes will matter right down to the tips of your toes, so make sure they match your look. For women, heels are a must if youβre out and about. Men should invest in a few pairs of high-quality brown and black leather shoes.\n\n[Image 4]\n\n[Step 5] Style your hair neatly and fashionably. Your hair should be clean and well-cut at all times. Women should try to apply heat; go for a sleek, straight look that can adapt to day and nighttime looks, or choose wavy curls or even a blowout for a style thatβs both classy and relaxed. For men, go for a styling mousse that wonβt leave your hair looking greasy or too slick. Facial hair should be neatly trimmed. Ask a hairstylist for their recommendations. What hair color will look best with your skin, or what cut will flatter your features?\n\n[Image 5]\n\n[Step 6] Wear natural makeup. Neon eyeshadows and caked-on foundation wonβt fly in elite socialite circles. Accentuate one feature, like a bold lip or smoky eyeshadow, and keep the rest natural. Fit your makeup to your outfit. Pairing a red lip with a black dress is always a good move, but dark, heavy eye makeup wonβt fit well with a light sundress.\n\n[Image 6]\n\n[Step 7] Wear designer brands. As you work your way up the social ladder, start paying attention to the βnamesβ youβre wearing. Even if youβre a ways off from the red carpet, stay up to date on fashion trends and designers-to-watch. Be knowledgeable about the fashion industry even though you may not be able to wear the big brands just yet. Subscribe to fashion magazines or follow style blogs to stay up to date on the current trends.\n\n[Image 7]\n\n[Step 8] Look your best at all times. You never know when youβll run into an acquaintance or even a photographer, so always dress to impress. Avoid βathleisureβ clothing, like leggings or sweatpants, unless youβre working out. Never leave your house with messy hair or smeared makeup.\n\n## Response B:\n[Step 1] Wear natural makeup. Neon eyeshadows and caked-on foundation wonβt fly in elite socialite circles. Accentuate one feature, like a bold lip or smoky eyeshadow, and keep the rest natural. Fit your makeup to your outfit. Pairing a red lip with a black dress is always a good move, but dark, heavy eye makeup wonβt fit well with a light sundress.\n\n[Image 1]\n\n[Step 2] Buy clothes that fit and flatter your shape. Gone are the days when you have to be stick-skinny to make your mark on high society! Dress to your body shape, avoiding shapeless dresses and T-shirts or jeans that cut off circulation or leave imprints on your hips. Choose clothes that fit your body and visit a tailor to ensure that your clothes fit to perfection.\n\n[Image 2]\n\n[Step 3] Choose stylish shoes. Your clothes will matter right down to the tips of your toes, so make sure they match your look. For women, heels are a must if youβre out and about. Men should invest in a few pairs of high-quality brown and black leather shoes.\n\n[Image 3]\n\n[Step 4] Invest in a few key accessories. A strand of pearls adds instant elegance to a womanβs style, while a well-chosen pocket square will add a classy dash of color to a manβs suit. A nice watch is always a solid addition to any outfit. Avoid gaudy, chunky, or flashy jewelry that calls attention to itself. As a socialite, youβre going for a tasteful, but understated look.\n\n[Image 4]\n\n[Step 5] Dress simply and tastefully. Stick to classic, tried-and-true styles as you start making your way into the socialite scene. For women, you canβt go wrong with dark wash jeans or a βlittle black dress.β Men should stick with dark, fitted suits.\n\n[Image 5]\n\n[Step 6] Look your best at all times. You never know when youβll run into an acquaintance or even a photographer, so always dress to impress. Avoid βathleisureβ clothing, like leggings or sweatpants, unless youβre working out. Never leave your house with messy hair or smeared makeup.\n\n[Image 6]\n\n[Step 7] Style your hair neatly and fashionably. Your hair should be clean and well-cut at all times. Women should try to apply heat; go for a sleek, straight look that can adapt to day and nighttime looks, or choose wavy curls or even a blowout for a style thatβs both classy and relaxed. For men, go for a styling mousse that wonβt leave your hair looking greasy or too slick. Facial hair should be neatly trimmed. Ask a hairstylist for their recommendations. What hair color will look best with your skin, or what cut will flatter your features?\n\n[Image 7]\n\n[Step 8] Wear designer brands. As you work your way up the social ladder, start paying attention to the βnamesβ youβre wearing. Even if youβre a ways off from the red carpet, stay up to date on fashion trends and designers-to-watch. Be knowledgeable about the fashion industry even though you may not be able to wear the big brands just yet. Subscribe to fashion magazines or follow style blogs to stay up to date on the current trends.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/comm_10696_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "interleaved",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "comm_10696",
"index": 11306
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nCreate a step-by-step guide: Wearing Belts Casually of How to Wear a Belt (for Women)\n\n## Response A:\n[Step 1] Add a belt to your favorite pair of denim shorts for hot days. Denim shorts worn with a thin belt are a great style for a day at the park. Pair this with a comfortable T-shirt for a fast and easy summer look.\n\n[Image 1]\n\n[Step 2] Belt a cardigan below your bustline for chilly days. This is a versatile look that can be relaxed when worn with a maxi skirt, but can easily transition into everyday office wear if itβs paired with a pencil skirt.\n\n[Image 2]\n\n[Step 3] Wear a romper belted at the waist for a fashionable style. Keep the outfit casual by opting for a neutral-toned belt and flip-flops. This is a great outfit for a day spent at the beach with friends. A bright, floral romper with a brown belt would be a good fashion choice for summer days.\n\n[Image 3]\n\n[Step 4] Knot a cloth belt for a casual look. Long cloth belts knotted at the waist are a great everyday option. Theyβre very comfortable to wear because they donβt have any extra hardware that could dig into your skin. Make sure the belt is long enough that it doesnβt stick out of your body at an odd angle. For a relaxed look, add a knotted belt to a band T-shirt and distressed jeans.\n\n[Image 4]\n\n[Step 5] Choose to wear mismatched belt and shoes for a fun twist. Go for contrasting colors that still look great together if youβre after a more casual look. This gives a sense of a modern and youthful woman. A red belt paired with boyfriend jeans and gold flats would look great on anyone!\n\n## Response B:\n[Step 1] Knot a cloth belt for a casual look. Long cloth belts knotted at the waist are a great everyday option. Theyβre very comfortable to wear because they donβt have any extra hardware that could dig into your skin. Make sure the belt is long enough that it doesnβt stick out of your body at an odd angle. For a relaxed look, add a knotted belt to a band T-shirt and distressed jeans.\n\n[Image 1]\n\n[Step 2] Belt a cardigan below your bustline for chilly days. This is a versatile look that can be relaxed when worn with a maxi skirt, but can easily transition into everyday office wear if itβs paired with a pencil skirt.\n\n[Image 2]\n\n[Step 3] Add a belt to your favorite pair of denim shorts for hot days. Denim shorts worn with a thin belt are a great style for a day at the park. Pair this with a comfortable T-shirt for a fast and easy summer look.\n\n[Image 3]\n\n[Step 4] Wear a romper belted at the waist for a fashionable style. Keep the outfit casual by opting for a neutral-toned belt and flip-flops. This is a great outfit for a day spent at the beach with friends. A bright, floral romper with a brown belt would be a good fashion choice for summer days.\n\n[Image 4]\n\n[Step 5] Choose to wear mismatched belt and shoes for a fun twist. Go for contrasting colors that still look great together if youβre after a more casual look. This gives a sense of a modern and youthful woman. A red belt paired with boyfriend jeans and gold flats would look great on anyone!\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/comm_6851_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "interleaved",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "comm_6851",
"index": 14573
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nProvide a detailed narrative of the image, emphasizing the visible celebrities and the scene.\n\n## Response A:\nIn the image, a renowned actor with a white beard and bushy mustache is captured in a dramatic scene. He's wearing a green shirt and holding a rifle, aiming it as if ready for action. The setting appears to be outdoors, possibly on a film set or during a movie shoot.\n\n## Response B:\nIn this image, there's a man with white hair and beard, focusing intently on something in the distance through the scope of his rifle. The blurry background showcases a scenic view, suggesting an outdoor setting.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/rlaifv_12219_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "reasoning",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "rlaifv_12219",
"index": 2467
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_2>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n[Image 1]: Response A\n[Image 2]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nEdit instruction: Replace the current blue car parked in the driveway with a sleek, modern black electric vehicle like a Tesla or similar style.\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/editreward_2169_input_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_2169_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_2169_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "editing",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "editreward_2169",
"index": 5589
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nDetail the image's components with particular focus on each entity.\n\n## Response A:\nAn action figure dressed in a blue, orange, and yellow clown outfit stands amidst various items: a red heart-shaped pillow, a pink curtain with white hearts, a black and white lampshade, a black and white heart-shaped pillow, and a stool.\n\n## Response B:\nThe image features a clown, wearing an orange wig and blue striped shirt, standing in front of a heart-shaped object.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/rlaifv_256_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "reasoning",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "rlaifv_256",
"index": 12609
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Response A\n[Image 1]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nGenerate an image for: A fantasy night sky with a golden crescent moon, intricate patterns, and two ethereal butterflies dancing.\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/open_img_prefs_3471_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/open_img_prefs_3471_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "t2i",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "open_img_prefs_3471",
"index": 1077
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nWhat ecg pathology is in\n\n## Response A:\nThe ecg pathology in the image is 'Tachycardia'.</s>\n\n## Response B:\nThe ECG shown in the image displays a pattern consistent with ventricular tachycardia (VT). Ventricular tachycardia is characterized by a series of rapid heartbeats that originate in the ventricles of the heart. This rhythm can be life-threatening and requires immediate medical attention.\n\nKey features that suggest ventricular tachycardia on this ECG include:\n\n1. A very rapid heart rate, which is typically above 100 beats per minute and can be much higher.\n2. Wide QRS complexes that are typically greater than 120 milliseconds in duration.\n3. A regular rhythm, although VT can sometimes be irregular.\n4. Absence of P waves associated with the QRS complexes, or P waves that occur independently of the QRS complexes (AV dissociation).\n\nIt is important to note that the diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia should be made in a clinical context, taking into account the patient's symptoms, history, and other diagnostic information. Treatment for VT may include medications, electrical cardioversion, or advanced interventions such as catheter ablation or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement, depending on the underlying cause and stability of the patient.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/wildvision_1105_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "interleaved",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "wildvision_1105",
"index": 19050
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_2>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n[Image 1]: Response A\n[Image 2]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nEdit instruction: Add a data annotation that explains the significance of the peak in network performance at 11:35 AM.\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/editreward_441_input_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_441_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_441_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "editing",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "editreward_441",
"index": 12059
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nExplain how to: Easy Gore Mask\n\n## Response A:\n[Step 1] Easy Gore MaskEasier than a professional mask, and a great way to show off artistic ability!\n\n[Image 1]\n\n[Step 2] You Will Need- any type of sculpting clay - cheap plaster of paris from Michael's or a hardware store - one bottle of liquid latex from Party City or Amazon (Amazon is literally half as expensive) - vaseline - paint brushes - cheap acrylic paint: white, skin tone, pink - rubber cement - fake blood - patients Total cost (latex from Amazon) $40\n\n[Image 2]\n\n[Step 3] SculptingSince this is meant to be cheap and easy the methods I use are supposed to help you through this with ease. You want to take a piece of tin foil big enough to cover your face and do that. Press the foil into all the recessed areas to get a general shape of your face. Find a rounded surface that can get dirty and sculpt the general outside shape of your face. Then starting from the middle build up the clay and smooth it with water to get an arc. Make your nose as exact as you can. The purpose of this is not to look anatomically correct. It is so the mask fits the basic shape of your face.\n\n[Image 3]\n\n[Step 4] Sculpting Step 2After you finish your face you can start sculpting the creature face. Traditional this are separately and latex is pored between the layers, but that requires expensive molding materials, more time, and high grade latex. You can sculpt whatever you want, but if you want it to look like mine... 1 add clay to the sides and bottom of the nose until the lower part of the mask meets the top of your nose (remember not to remove clay add it for a better fit) 2 remove a quarter size cylinder all the way down through the clay and smooth edges for both eyes. 3 add thin strips of clay to the mouth and smooth them\n\n[Image 4]\n\n[Step 5] CastingGrab a box that can be ruined and place your sculpt in it. The purpose of cast is to get a negative of the sculpt. Mix the plaster in container you can. (Ruined also) I used a Gatorade bottle and filled it about halfway each time. You want the first batch to be runny to fit in all the recessed places. Plaster dries in less than 5 minutes and gets hot. Wash your hands after each batch. You want to cover the entire mask. The next batch and every batch after it should be like thick cake batter. This will help build the mask faster. The thicker the coat the less you need to do. The end result should be an at least 1/4 inch thick shell. I can't stress enough make sure your edges are super thick. Let the mold dry for an hour after your last coat. Take a sharp knife and cut around the edges of the plaster all the way down to clay. Then using the knife slowly pry the plaster off. ( Be patient and careful. If it cracks simply hot glue it or mix up some plaster and use it as glue. Then pour a generous amount of plaster over it to make sure it is reinforced. Also plaster will come out of most cloth. Wash with hot water and soap.)\n\n[Image 5]\n\n[Step 6] Clay RemovalOnce plaster has set it becomes fairly water resistant. Use and tools you can to remove all of the clay then rinse the mold with hot water. This will loosen up clay and help you remove it. The end result counts on this step.\n\n[Image 6]\n\n[Step 7] Start Adding LatexLatex is a liquid that dries into rubber at room temperature. That being said a hair dryer will speed up this next step. (LATEX WILL RUIN ANY CLOTH IT TOUCHES) brush a small amount a Vaseline into every part of the mold. Make sure to coat deep areas. This will help remove the latex. Make sure it is just a coating not a build up. Pour a small amount of latex into the mold and swirl it around. A hair dryer will really help here. You need to move it around until every part has been reached. Heat will help trap the latex so it doesn't keep running. Use and old piece of cloth to start dabbing latex into the mold then let it dry or heat it. Make sure to get deep areas and edges extremely well. Do this until the whole thing is the color in the picture from one of my other masks. THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT. latex sticks to itself so well that is almost impossible to separate it. You need to dust the entire in side with powder. I learned the hard way. Start pulling the mask very slowly from the mold. You may need a knife to start an edge. At the first sign if tearing or if the mask is to thin lay it back down, and cover with mor layers. Powder the other side once you remove the mask. Note that white means it isn't dry, clear is too thin, and yellowing is just right. \n\n[Image 7]\n\n[Step 8] Paint, Blood, StichesYou can paint it however you want I'll tell you how I did mine. Just know that some paint and rubber cement reacts badly with each other and produces an awful smell. Test yours by making a small piece of latex on wax paper, mixing 60/40 paint to cement then brushing it on. Let it dry. If it smells use different paint. Again learned the hard way. Take a 40/60 mix with white paint and cover the whole thing using an old piece of cloth or the brush in the cement can. Allow it to dry and add skin color. Use a very small amount of it and dry brush it on with the cloth. Use black sharpie for the eyes and mouth. Then mix 70/30 fake blood to rubber cement and use the brush to apply into the mouth and some on the eyes. This will take several coats. Stitches were made out of pulled apart yarn attached with latex. You can cut the back of the eyes out and make sure the mask fits cut eyes accordingly. Add more sharpie if you cut the eyes more.\n\n[Image 8]\n\n[Step 9] ApplicationTake latex on you finger and apply to the bridge of your nose a circle on your check and chin. Press the mask firmly into your face and pull up and adjust it however you need to. Put latex on the wings of the mask and stretch them to the sides of your face. You can add fake blood to the stitches too.\n\n## Response B:\n[Step 1] Sculpting Step 2After you finish your face you can start sculpting the creature face. Traditional this are separately and latex is pored between the layers, but that requires expensive molding materials, more time, and high grade latex. You can sculpt whatever you want, but if you want it to look like mine... 1 add clay to the sides and bottom of the nose until the lower part of the mask meets the top of your nose (remember not to remove clay add it for a better fit) 2 remove a quarter size cylinder all the way down through the clay and smooth edges for both eyes. 3 add thin strips of clay to the mouth and smooth them\n\n[Image 1]\n\n[Step 2] CastingGrab a box that can be ruined and place your sculpt in it. The purpose of cast is to get a negative of the sculpt. Mix the plaster in container you can. (Ruined also) I used a Gatorade bottle and filled it about halfway each time. You want the first batch to be runny to fit in all the recessed places. Plaster dries in less than 5 minutes and gets hot. Wash your hands after each batch. You want to cover the entire mask. The next batch and every batch after it should be like thick cake batter. This will help build the mask faster. The thicker the coat the less you need to do. The end result should be an at least 1/4 inch thick shell. I can't stress enough make sure your edges are super thick. Let the mold dry for an hour after your last coat. Take a sharp knife and cut around the edges of the plaster all the way down to clay. Then using the knife slowly pry the plaster off. ( Be patient and careful. If it cracks simply hot glue it or mix up some plaster and use it as glue. Then pour a generous amount of plaster over it to make sure it is reinforced. Also plaster will come out of most cloth. Wash with hot water and soap.)\n\n[Image 2]\n\n[Step 3] Easy Gore MaskEasier than a professional mask, and a great way to show off artistic ability!\n\n[Image 3]\n\n[Step 4] Clay RemovalOnce plaster has set it becomes fairly water resistant. Use and tools you can to remove all of the clay then rinse the mold with hot water. This will loosen up clay and help you remove it. The end result counts on this step.\n\n[Image 4]\n\n[Step 5] You Will Need- any type of sculpting clay - cheap plaster of paris from Michael's or a hardware store - one bottle of liquid latex from Party City or Amazon (Amazon is literally half as expensive) - vaseline - paint brushes - cheap acrylic paint: white, skin tone, pink - rubber cement - fake blood - patients Total cost (latex from Amazon) $40\n\n[Image 5]\n\n[Step 6] SculptingSince this is meant to be cheap and easy the methods I use are supposed to help you through this with ease. You want to take a piece of tin foil big enough to cover your face and do that. Press the foil into all the recessed areas to get a general shape of your face. Find a rounded surface that can get dirty and sculpt the general outside shape of your face. Then starting from the middle build up the clay and smooth it with water to get an arc. Make your nose as exact as you can. The purpose of this is not to look anatomically correct. It is so the mask fits the basic shape of your face.\n\n[Image 6]\n\n[Step 7] Start Adding LatexLatex is a liquid that dries into rubber at room temperature. That being said a hair dryer will speed up this next step. (LATEX WILL RUIN ANY CLOTH IT TOUCHES) brush a small amount a Vaseline into every part of the mold. Make sure to coat deep areas. This will help remove the latex. Make sure it is just a coating not a build up. Pour a small amount of latex into the mold and swirl it around. A hair dryer will really help here. You need to move it around until every part has been reached. Heat will help trap the latex so it doesn't keep running. Use and old piece of cloth to start dabbing latex into the mold then let it dry or heat it. Make sure to get deep areas and edges extremely well. Do this until the whole thing is the color in the picture from one of my other masks. THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT. latex sticks to itself so well that is almost impossible to separate it. You need to dust the entire in side with powder. I learned the hard way. Start pulling the mask very slowly from the mold. You may need a knife to start an edge. At the first sign if tearing or if the mask is to thin lay it back down, and cover with mor layers. Powder the other side once you remove the mask. Note that white means it isn't dry, clear is too thin, and yellowing is just right. \n\n[Image 7]\n\n[Step 8] Paint, Blood, StichesYou can paint it however you want I'll tell you how I did mine. Just know that some paint and rubber cement reacts badly with each other and produces an awful smell. Test yours by making a small piece of latex on wax paper, mixing 60/40 paint to cement then brushing it on. Let it dry. If it smells use different paint. Again learned the hard way. Take a 40/60 mix with white paint and cover the whole thing using an old piece of cloth or the brush in the cement can. Allow it to dry and add skin color. Use a very small amount of it and dry brush it on with the cloth. Use black sharpie for the eyes and mouth. Then mix 70/30 fake blood to rubber cement and use the brush to apply into the mouth and some on the eyes. This will take several coats. Stitches were made out of pulled apart yarn attached with latex. You can cut the back of the eyes out and make sure the mask fits cut eyes accordingly. Add more sharpie if you cut the eyes more.\n\n[Image 8]\n\n[Step 9] ApplicationTake latex on you finger and apply to the bridge of your nose a circle on your check and chin. Press the mask firmly into your face and pull up and adjust it however you need to. Put latex on the wings of the mask and stretch them to the sides of your face. You can add fake blood to the stitches too.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/comm_392_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "interleaved",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "comm_392",
"index": 4564
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nWrite a detailed description of the given image.\n\n## Response A:\nThe image depicts a large library with multiple levels, showcasing a spacious and well-organized reading space. The library has a number of tables and chairs, with some people sitting and studying. There are several bookshelves filled with books, creating a cozy and inviting atmosphere. The library has a total of 14 books, with some of them placed on the tables and others on the shelves. The people in the library are scattered throughout the space, with some sitting at the tables and others standing or walking around. The library also features a staircase, which leads to the upper levels.\n\n## Response B:\nThe image depicts a large library with multiple tables and chairs arranged in rows. There are two people sitting at the tables, one on the left side and the other on the right side. The tables are placed in a way that allows for easy access to the books and other materials. In the background, there are several bookshelves filled with books, creating a cozy and inviting atmosphere for readers. The library appears to be well-organized and well-maintained, with a variety of books available for browsing and reading.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/llava_critic_15216_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "reasoning",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "llava_critic_15216",
"index": 15705
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_2>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n[Image 1]: Response A\n[Image 2]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nEdit instruction: Change this flowchart to flow from bottom to top.\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/editreward_20079_input_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_20079_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_20079_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "editing",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "editreward_20079",
"index": 13242
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nwho is the memorial for?\n\n## Response A:\nThe memorial is for Minnie Lansbury. This suggests that the clock might have been dedicated to her or commemorates a significant event or achievement related to her.\n\n## Response B:\nThe memorial is for Minnie Lansbury. The presence of the clock on a memorial suggests that it might be a significant figure or event in history, and the memorial serves as a reminder of their contributions or legacy.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/rlaifv_15092_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "reasoning",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "rlaifv_15092",
"index": 7150
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_2>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n[Image 1]: Response A\n[Image 2]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nEdit instruction: Enhance the table design on this slide and incorporate some icons.\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/editreward_333_input_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_333_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_333_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "editing",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "editreward_333",
"index": 16675
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Response A\n[Image 1]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nGenerate an image for: Fantasy male rogue, dimly lit, intricate details, spray paint, urban graffiti, bold strokes, vibrant colors, gritty texture.\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/open_img_prefs_531_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/open_img_prefs_531_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "t2i",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "open_img_prefs_531",
"index": 6734
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nHow long will the ride be?\n\n## Response A:\nThe image shows a group of people biking down a road together. However, without additional context or information about the specific location and distance of their journey, I cannot confidently determine the length of their ride.\n\n## Response B:\nBased on the image, it appears that these cyclists are in the midst of a lengthy ride. The exact duration or distance is not discernible from the picture alone, but it seems to be an extended journey given the presence of multiple cyclists and their determination to continue pedaling together.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/rlaifv_23279_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "reasoning",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "rlaifv_23279",
"index": 2177
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_2>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n[Image 1]: Response A\n[Image 2]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nEdit instruction: Apply a worn and rusty texture to the green tank asset on the right, giving it the appearance of aged metal used in battle.\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/editreward_3224_input_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_3224_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_3224_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "editing",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "editreward_3224",
"index": 18139
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_2>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n[Image 1]: Response A\n[Image 2]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nEdit instruction: Generate realistic swirling clouds of fine dust and scattering debris particles around the chaotic, dynamic center of the physics simulation.\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/editreward_1444_input_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_1444_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_1444_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "editing",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "editreward_1444",
"index": 8958
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Response A\n[Image 1]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nphotograph of a black-eyed woman floating in a black gown\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/rapidata_16_343_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/rapidata_16_343_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "t2i",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "rapidata_16_343",
"index": 19410
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nCreate an in-depth description describing the people in the given image, include the person/character name, actions, expressions, etc.\n\n## Response A:\nIn the image, a group of people are gathered around horses in a forest setting. A man is sitting atop one of the horses, possibly engaged in conversation with another individual who is standing close to him. The presence of trees and the natural environment suggests that this could be a scene from a movie or a documentary focusing on equestrian activities or outdoor adventures. The exact identities of the individuals or the specific context of the scene cannot be determined from the image alone.\n\n## Response B:\nThe image features a group of people, including a man and woman who are interacting with horses. The man is seated on one of the horses, possibly in conversation or guidance, while the woman appears to be assisting or communicating with him. The setting seems outdoors, possibly in a rural or wooded area, suggesting a scene from a movie or a documentary about horse riding or training. The exact identities of the individuals or the specific context of their interaction cannot be determined from the image alone.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/rlaifv_14795_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "reasoning",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "rlaifv_14795",
"index": 9932
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nWhat can be seen in the nasal endoscopy of the left nasal cavity?\n\n## Response A:\nIn the nasal endoscopy of the left nasal cavity, a large polyp can be seen.\n\n## Response B:\nBy analyzing the visual context of the image, a accurate and accurate answer to the question is The left side of the nose. . Because This picture shows an endoscope in someone's nostril. you can see it clearly on the right side of the photo. there are also some other things that appear as small dots around this area but they aren 't clear enough for me to identify them. these spots could be blood vessels or something else entirely. i don ' t know what those objects actually represent. therefore I cannot provide any more details about them. otherwise, the rest of the image looks like it was taken inside a dark room with no visible light sources. the only thing we can make out here is the object being viewed through the lens which appears to have captured the scene from the person's nostril. so, if you want to find anything else, you will need to look at another part of the image. not much else stands out in this particular frame. the background seems too blurry to read anything useful. therefore, the main focus remains the view through the lens. it may give us insights into how the body functions. though without knowing its purpose, it might seem difficult to analyze further.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/llava_critic_14780_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "reasoning",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "llava_critic_14780",
"index": 5826
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Response A\n[Image 1]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nGenerate an image for: Pixel art surgeon in a medical setting, wearing an AR headset, hands over a patient. Holographic ultrasound on the patient, emphasizing the AR experience.\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/open_img_prefs_6943_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/open_img_prefs_6943_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "t2i",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "open_img_prefs_6943",
"index": 16614
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nWhat might be the story behind the worn teddy bear?\n\n## Response A:\nThe image of this well-worn teddy bear could tell a story of deep sentimental value and the passage of time. Perhaps this bear was once a cherished companion to a child, offering comfort during thunderstorms, companionship during adventures in the backyard, and a confidant for whispered secrets. Over the years, it may have been hugged tightly countless times, its fur worn down from love and its eyes dulled from being carried everywhere.\n\nThe setting against a tree suggests that this teddy may have been rediscovered, perhaps in an attic or at a garage sale, evoking memories for an adult who once loved it. Or maybe it was left outside by a child who has outgrown its need, leaving it to become part of the landscape until noticed by a passerby. Each tear and matted patch of fur could be a chapter of its life, echoing the laughter and tears of a childhood long passed. It's a visual reminder that the most humble of objects can be the repository of our deepest emotions and memories.\n\n## Response B:\nThe worn teddy bear in the image appears to have been weathered by time and exposure to the elements. It is possible that this teddy bear was once a beloved toy for a child, but over time, it has been left outside or exposed to the elements, leading to its current state of wear and tear. The teddy bear's appearance suggests that it has been through a lot, and it might have been a favorite toy for a child who played with it frequently, or it might have been a sentimental keepsake that was kept outside or displayed in a way that allowed it to be exposed to the elements. The story behind the teddy bear's condition is likely a mix of nostalgia and the passage of time.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/llava_critic_16237_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "reasoning",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "llava_critic_16237",
"index": 7732
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_2>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n[Image 1]: Response A\n[Image 2]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nEdit instruction: Add an elderly woman with gray hair on the right side of the image.\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/editreward_8213_input_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_8213_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_8213_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "editing",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "editreward_8213",
"index": 8632
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_2>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n[Image 1]: Response A\n[Image 2]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nEdit instruction: replace the cooked shrimp into a raw shrimp\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/editreward_154_input_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_154_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_154_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "editing",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "editreward_154",
"index": 11209
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nCreate an in-depth description describing the people in the given image, include the person/character name, actions, expressions, etc.\n\n## Response A:\nThe image features the character Edward Scissorhands, portrayed by actor Johnny Depp. He is holding a pair of scissors in each hand and wears black suspenders over his white shirt. His hair is unkempt, and he has green makeup around his eyes.\n\n## Response B:\nThe image features the character Edward Scissorhands, portrayed by actor Johnny Depp. He is holding a pair of large scissors in each hand and wearing a collared white shirt with black suspenders. His hair is dark and wildly styled, and he has green lipstick on his lips, giving him a distinct appearance.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/rlaifv_7760_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "reasoning",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "rlaifv_7760",
"index": 4671
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_2>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n[Image 1]: Response A\n[Image 2]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nEdit instruction: Make the plate all white with a blue stripe.\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/editreward_18466_input_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_18466_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_18466_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "editing",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "editreward_18466",
"index": 19403
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_2>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n[Image 1]: Response A\n[Image 2]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nEdit instruction: Change the black car top with a shiny blue one.\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/editreward_17977_input_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_17977_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_17977_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "editing",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "editreward_17977",
"index": 8153
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nWhat type of alcohol is advertised here?\n\n## Response A:\nThe type of alcohol being advertised here is cider. It's likely that the advertisement is promoting a specific brand or company's product line, using this image as a form of marketing to attract potential customers.\n\n## Response B:\nThe alcohol advertised here is cider. It's a popular drink made from fermented apples that has been enjoyed for centuries, particularly in regions where apple production is abundant. Cider can be consumed on its own or mixed with other liquors, depending on the preference of the individual.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/rlaifv_310_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "reasoning",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "rlaifv_310",
"index": 17808
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nExplain how to: How to Make the Double Crochet Stitch\n\n## Response A:\n[Step 1] How to Make the Double Crochet StitchHi everyone! I hope that you're having a great day =) In today's tutorial i want to demonstrate for you, how to make a basic crochet stitch called Double Crochet. It's super easy to make and very useful too! (i'm pretty sure that for many of us, a scarf made with this stitch was one of our first projects) =) So, let's begin! ^_^\n\n[Image 1]\n\n[Step 2] Video Tutorial*** TIMELINE *** 0:00 Introduction 0:28 Tutorial 1:57 First Option to make the Double Crochet 4:34 Second Option to make the Double Crochet 7:22 Slow-Motion 8:45 Tips & Tricks 9:05 Ending\n\n[Image 2]\n\n[Step 3] Phototutorial / STEP 01Before we start making our first Double Crochet , we must have a row of Foundation Chains on a Slip Knot . If you don't remember how to make the stitch or the knot, you might want to give a quick look to the Instructable of the Slip Knot and the Chain Stitch . For this tutorial, weβre gonna work only 5 foundation chains and when we have them weβre gonna work three extra chains , which are gonna be used to give the necessary height to our first stitch of the row. Remember, when we begin a new row using a Double Crochet, we must work three extra chains at the beginning. To make the extra chains, we repeat the same pattern of the Chain Stich , i mean, yarn over , remember this means that we have to put the yarn over the hook, and now we pull the hook with the yarn through the loop that was already on the hook. Now, we have to repeat it twice . Before we continue, i want to say that you can start working your Double Crochet in two different ways , in the first one, weβre going to count the three extra chains as our first Double Crochet and in the second weβre not. \n\n[Image 3]\n\n[Step 4] Phototutorial / FIRST OPTION: STEP 01If we have chosen the first option and we decide to count the extra chains as the first stitch, weβre going to make the second Double Crochet in the fifth chain from hook . To begin our second Double Crochet, we have to yarn over (this means that we have to put the yarn over the hook) and now weβre going to introduce the hook in the fifth chain from hook , remember, we donβt count the loop or chain that is already on the hook because is our working loop. Thatβs why we pass to the next one and we count one, two, three, four and five, and itβs in that fifth chain where weβre going to introduce the hook, yarn over, pull the hook through the chain (by now we must have 3 loops on our hook), yarn over and pull the hook with the yarn through the first two loops only, we have two loops left, so we yarn over one more time and pull it through the last two loops on the hook. \n\n[Image 4]\n\n[Step 5] Phototutorial / FIRST OPTION: STEP 02Remember, the pattern to make a Double Crochet is yarn over , now introduce the hook in the chain or stitch where you wanna work it, yarn over again and pull the hook through the chain or stitch (by now you should have 3 loops on your hook) yarn over and pull the hook with the yarn through the first two loops only, yarn over one last time and pull the hook through the last two loops on the hook. \n\n[Image 5]\n\n[Step 6] Phototutorial / FIRST OPTION: STEP 02 (II)This is how our foundation chains looks once that we have a Double Crochet in every one of them.\n\n[Image 6]\n\n[Step 7] Phototutorial / SECOND OPTION: STEP 01Now, if we have chosen the second option , the one where we do not count our extra chains as our first stitch, weβre going to repeat the same pattern but instead of starting in the fifth chain from hook, weβre going to make it in the fourth chain from hook . So we start making the three extra chains, and for this, remember, we yarn over (this means that we have to put the yarn over the hook ) now pull the hook through the loop that is already on it, and you have finish your first chain stitch, repeat this pattern twice to finish with three extra chains. \n\n[Image 7]\n\n[Step 8] Phototutorial / SECOND OPTION: STEP 02Now yarn over and introduce the hook in the fourth chain from hook , remember, we're not counting the loop or chain that is already on the hook because is our working loop , so we pass to the next one, and we count one, two, three and four, and in this fourth chain weβre going to introduce the hook, yarn over , pull the hook through the chain (by now we must have 3 loops on our hook), yarn over and pull the hook with the yarn through the first two loops only, yarn over one last time and pull the hook through the last two loops on the hook. \n\n[Image 8]\n\n[Step 9] Phototutorial / SECOND OPTION: STEP 02 (II)And this is how it looks our first Double Crochet.\n\n[Image 9]\n\n[Step 10] Phototutorial / SECOND OPTION: STEP 03Remember, we have to yarn over and introduce the hook in the chain or stitch where we want to make it, yarn over again, pull the hook through the chain or stitch (you should have 3 loops on the hook) , yarn over and pull the hook with the yarn through the first two loops only (we have two loops left) , yarn over one last time and pull the hook through the last two loops on it. \n\n[Image 10]\n\n[Step 11] Phototutorial / SECOND OPTION: STEP 03 (II)This is how our foundation chains looks once that we have a Double Crochet in every one of them.\n\n[Image 11]\n\n[Step 12] What Option Should I Use?The main difference between these two options, is that the second one is only recommended when you are working in circular , because it gives a better look to the part where you join the rounds and also avoid the appearance of holes. P.S. Don't forget to watch the video tutorial for tips, tricks and more! =)\n\n## Response B:\n[Step 1] What Option Should I Use?The main difference between these two options, is that the second one is only recommended when you are working in circular , because it gives a better look to the part where you join the rounds and also avoid the appearance of holes. P.S. Don't forget to watch the video tutorial for tips, tricks and more! =)\n\n[Image 1]\n\n[Step 2] Video Tutorial*** TIMELINE *** 0:00 Introduction 0:28 Tutorial 1:57 First Option to make the Double Crochet 4:34 Second Option to make the Double Crochet 7:22 Slow-Motion 8:45 Tips & Tricks 9:05 Ending\n\n[Image 2]\n\n[Step 3] Phototutorial / SECOND OPTION: STEP 02 (II)And this is how it looks our first Double Crochet.\n\n[Image 3]\n\n[Step 4] Phototutorial / FIRST OPTION: STEP 02 (II)This is how our foundation chains looks once that we have a Double Crochet in every one of them.\n\n[Image 4]\n\n[Step 5] Phototutorial / SECOND OPTION: STEP 03Remember, we have to yarn over and introduce the hook in the chain or stitch where we want to make it, yarn over again, pull the hook through the chain or stitch (you should have 3 loops on the hook) , yarn over and pull the hook with the yarn through the first two loops only (we have two loops left) , yarn over one last time and pull the hook through the last two loops on it. \n\n[Image 5]\n\n[Step 6] Phototutorial / SECOND OPTION: STEP 03 (II)This is how our foundation chains looks once that we have a Double Crochet in every one of them.\n\n[Image 6]\n\n[Step 7] Phototutorial / SECOND OPTION: STEP 01Now, if we have chosen the second option , the one where we do not count our extra chains as our first stitch, weβre going to repeat the same pattern but instead of starting in the fifth chain from hook, weβre going to make it in the fourth chain from hook . So we start making the three extra chains, and for this, remember, we yarn over (this means that we have to put the yarn over the hook ) now pull the hook through the loop that is already on it, and you have finish your first chain stitch, repeat this pattern twice to finish with three extra chains. \n\n[Image 7]\n\n[Step 8] Phototutorial / FIRST OPTION: STEP 01If we have chosen the first option and we decide to count the extra chains as the first stitch, weβre going to make the second Double Crochet in the fifth chain from hook . To begin our second Double Crochet, we have to yarn over (this means that we have to put the yarn over the hook) and now weβre going to introduce the hook in the fifth chain from hook , remember, we donβt count the loop or chain that is already on the hook because is our working loop. Thatβs why we pass to the next one and we count one, two, three, four and five, and itβs in that fifth chain where weβre going to introduce the hook, yarn over, pull the hook through the chain (by now we must have 3 loops on our hook), yarn over and pull the hook with the yarn through the first two loops only, we have two loops left, so we yarn over one more time and pull it through the last two loops on the hook. \n\n[Image 8]\n\n[Step 9] How to Make the Double Crochet StitchHi everyone! I hope that you're having a great day =) In today's tutorial i want to demonstrate for you, how to make a basic crochet stitch called Double Crochet. It's super easy to make and very useful too! (i'm pretty sure that for many of us, a scarf made with this stitch was one of our first projects) =) So, let's begin! ^_^\n\n[Image 9]\n\n[Step 10] Phototutorial / STEP 01Before we start making our first Double Crochet , we must have a row of Foundation Chains on a Slip Knot . If you don't remember how to make the stitch or the knot, you might want to give a quick look to the Instructable of the Slip Knot and the Chain Stitch . For this tutorial, weβre gonna work only 5 foundation chains and when we have them weβre gonna work three extra chains , which are gonna be used to give the necessary height to our first stitch of the row. Remember, when we begin a new row using a Double Crochet, we must work three extra chains at the beginning. To make the extra chains, we repeat the same pattern of the Chain Stich , i mean, yarn over , remember this means that we have to put the yarn over the hook, and now we pull the hook with the yarn through the loop that was already on the hook. Now, we have to repeat it twice . Before we continue, i want to say that you can start working your Double Crochet in two different ways , in the first one, weβre going to count the three extra chains as our first Double Crochet and in the second weβre not. \n\n[Image 10]\n\n[Step 11] Phototutorial / SECOND OPTION: STEP 02Now yarn over and introduce the hook in the fourth chain from hook , remember, we're not counting the loop or chain that is already on the hook because is our working loop , so we pass to the next one, and we count one, two, three and four, and in this fourth chain weβre going to introduce the hook, yarn over , pull the hook through the chain (by now we must have 3 loops on our hook), yarn over and pull the hook with the yarn through the first two loops only, yarn over one last time and pull the hook through the last two loops on the hook. \n\n[Image 11]\n\n[Step 12] Phototutorial / FIRST OPTION: STEP 02Remember, the pattern to make a Double Crochet is yarn over , now introduce the hook in the chain or stitch where you wanna work it, yarn over again and pull the hook through the chain or stitch (by now you should have 3 loops on your hook) yarn over and pull the hook with the yarn through the first two loops only, yarn over one last time and pull the hook through the last two loops on the hook.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/comm_11434_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "interleaved",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "comm_11434",
"index": 7307
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_2>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n[Image 1]: Response A\n[Image 2]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nEdit instruction: Make the background a tennis court.\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/editreward_14059_input_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_14059_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_14059_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "editing",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "editreward_14059",
"index": 7948
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Response A\n[Image 1]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\na fluffy pillow and a leather belt\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/rapidata_11_119_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/rapidata_11_119_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "t2i",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "rapidata_11_119",
"index": 6231
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nHow many displays can you see? List them in a bulleted list\n\n## Response A:\n* 1 laptop screen\n* 2 desktop monitors\n* 1 tablet screen\n\n## Response B:\nThere are five displays visible in the image. Here is the list:\n\n- Laptop display (left side)\n- Tablet display (bottom left)\n- First monitor (left center)\n- Second monitor (center)\n- Third monitor (right side)\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/wildvision_2396_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "interleaved",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "wildvision_2396",
"index": 12073
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n\n## Original Prompt:\nWhat are these animals standing inside of?\n\n## Response A:\nIn the image, the animals are standing inside of a trailer. Trailers are often used to transport livestock or other animals safely and efficiently from one location to another. The presence of the trailer suggests that these sheep may have been moved or are being prepared for movement.\n\n## Response B:\nThe animals in the image are standing inside a metal shed or fenced area. This enclosure provides a designated space for the sheep to rest, feed, and stay safe within the larger pasture.\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/rlaifv_17932_input_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "reasoning",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "rlaifv_17932",
"index": 15040
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_2>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n[Image 1]: Response A\n[Image 2]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nEdit instruction: Transform the editor background into a dynamic galaxy theme, with stars subtly moving across the screen.\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/editreward_21751_input_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_21751_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_21751_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "a",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "editing",
"chosen_position": "a",
"id": "editreward_21751",
"index": 4504
}
|
[
{
"content": [
{
"image": "<image_0>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_1>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": "<image_2>",
"text": null,
"type": "image"
},
{
"image": null,
"text": "## Image Layout:\n[Image 0]: Input image\n[Image 1]: Response A\n[Image 2]: Response B\n\n## Original Prompt:\nEdit instruction: Remove the text \"ζι£θη³\" and rewrite as \"ιΈ‘θθη³\"\n\n## Response A:\n[Image]\n\n## Response B:\n[Image]\n\n## Your Task:\nYou are an expert multimodal judge. Given two responses to the Original Prompt, you must determine which response better fulfills the prompt.\n\n**Instructions:**\n1. Extract key observations from the image(s) provided\n2. Identify verifiable claims from each response\n3. Check each claim against your observations\n4. Provide final scores where the better response gets the higher score\n\n**Output Format:**\n<image_understanding>\nDescribe what you observe in each image. Be specific and factual.\n</image_understanding>\n\n<response_claims>\nResponse A claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response A]\n\nResponse B claims:\n- [List key claims/aspects of Response B]\n</response_claims>\n\n<consistency_verification>\nResponse A:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n\nResponse B:\n- [Verify each claim: β or β with brief reason]\n</consistency_verification>\n\n<scores>\n\\boxed{A_score, B_score}\n</scores>\n\n**Rules:**\n- Scores must be integers from 1-10 (higher = better)\n- You MUST NOT give ties - one response must score higher\n- Base scores on prompt adherence and claim consistency\n- End your response with </scores>",
"type": "text"
}
],
"role": "user"
}
] |
[
"images/editreward_10792_input_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_10792_resp_a_0.jpg",
"images/editreward_10792_resp_b_0.jpg"
] |
mj1_judge
|
{
"ground_truth": "b",
"style": "rule"
}
|
{
"category": "editing",
"chosen_position": "b",
"id": "editreward_10792",
"index": 10803
}
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
No dataset card yet
- Downloads last month
- 38