answers dict | title stringlengths 16 40 | context stringlengths 13 1.96k | question stringclasses 124
values | id stringlengths 1 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
{
"text": [
"3.6%"
],
"answer_start": [
109
]
} | 10.1039/C2TA00883A | As a consequence of the improvements of Jsc and Voc, the overall conversion efficiency (η) values for SQM1a (3.6%) were higher than those for SQM1b (2.9%) and MSQ (2.2%), although their fill factors (FF) were comparable (0.51 for SQM1a, 0.53 for SQM1b, and 0.50 for MSQ). | What is the value of η? | 66097 |
{
"text": [
"14.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
69
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA02502H | The photovoltaic cell reaches a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 14.9%, which is comparable to or even better than that of the devices using the traditional doped 2,2′,7,7′-tetrakis(N,N′-di-p-methoxyphenylamine)-9,9′-spirobifluorene (spiro-OMeTAD) hole transport material under equivalent conditions. | What is the value of PCE? | 13770 |
{
"text": [
"19.0%"
],
"answer_start": [
290
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.06.044 | In comparison with the MAPbI3 based device with a maximum PCE of 14.4% including an open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 1.01 V, a short circuit current density (JSC) of 20.1 mA cm−2 and a fill factor (FF) of 70.6%, the MAPbI3−xClx based device surprisingly exhibited a much higher maximum PCE of 19.0%, which is attributed to ... | What is the value of PCE? | 8105 |
{
"text": [
"673mV"
],
"answer_start": [
102
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2014.02.074 | With a short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 12.11mAcm−1, an open-circuit photovoltage (Voc) of 673mV and a fill factor (FF) of 0.66, an ISB-4 based cell exhibits the highest PCE (η) of 5.36%. | What is the value of Voc? | 46098 |
{
"text": [
"5.76%"
],
"answer_start": [
274
]
} | 10.1039/C4CP04240A | The individually N719 sensitized device was found to exhibit an overall conversion efficiency (η) value of 5.43% (with Jsc = 12.61 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.71 V, and FF = 0.61), while the co-sensitized solar cell devices M0/N719, M1o/N719, M1p/N719 and M2/N719 showed an η value of 5.76% (with Jsc = 13.09 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.71 V,... | What is the value of η? | 61361 |
{
"text": [
"I−/I3−"
],
"answer_start": [
240
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.03.022 | ηcc is related to the competition between charge recombination and electron transport in photoanode, which can be interpreted from the EIS results in (c)], the left semicircle in the high-frequency (R1) corresponds to the redox reaction of I−/I3− at Pt counter electrode/electrolyte interface, and the middle semicircle ... | What is redox reaction? | 59483 |
{
"text": [
"8.55%"
],
"answer_start": [
25
]
} | 10.1039/C6EE00424E | In this case, the PCE is 8.55%, which, as far as we know, is the highest reported for a cell containing a photoanode deposited on a plastic substrate. | What is the value of PCE? | 61423 |
{
"text": [
"9.05%"
],
"answer_start": [
66
]
} | 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.10.018 | The DSSCs based on the Co-N-CNFs CE reached a high average PCE of 9.05%. | What is the value of PCE? | 49483 |
{
"text": [
"6.15%"
],
"answer_start": [
64
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.100 | The DSSC with Co0.42Ni0.58Se CE has achieved the highest PCE of 6.15%, which is larger than that of the DSSC with Pt CE (5.53%).Selenium oxide (AR), cobalt acetate tetrahydrate (AR), nickel acetate tetrahydrate (AR), benzyl alcohol (AR), n-hexane (AR), acetone (AR) and ethanol (AR) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemica... | What is the value of PCE? | 38668 |
{
"text": [
"8.45%"
],
"answer_start": [
35
]
} | 10.1039/C6NR00301J | We also achieved an average PCE of 8.45% and the maximum PCE of 8.83% for solar cells containing the active layer of CH3NH3Sn0.25Pb0.75I3 prepared via the only-thermal annealing. | What is the value of PCE? | 14625 |
{
"text": [
"Mesoporous TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
0
]
} | 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.164061 | Mesoporous TiO2 as ETL plays an efficient role in efficiency enhancement. | What is ETL? | 10203 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
8
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2007.05.003 | The PEO-TiO2-PC(CsI/I3−) composite polymer electrolyte presents the optimum redox couple diffusion characteristics and the highest degree of amorphicity. | What is ? | 54480 |
{
"text": [
"0.67 V"
],
"answer_start": [
88
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2004.02.050 | A high solar energy-to-electricity conversion efficiency of 9.2% (Jsc=19.0 mA cm−2, Voc=0.67 V, and FF=0.72) was attained under AM 1.5 irradiation (100 mW cm−2) using a novel electrolyte consisting of 1.5 M EMImI, 0.05 M iodine, and acetonitrile as a solvent with an antireflection film.Dye-sensitized nanocrystalline Ti... | What is the value of Voc? | 49689 |
{
"text": [
"9.23%"
],
"answer_start": [
202
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA01621H | On the other hand, BR-DSSC showed superior performance to SS-DSSC, with a higher Voc (0.692 V), Jsc (18.4 mA cm−2) and a FF of 0.73, which result in a higher overall energy conversion efficiency of η = 9.23%, showing a 16% increment in η compared to SS-DSSC. | What is the value of η? | 76287 |
{
"text": [
"0.801 V"
],
"answer_start": [
185
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA01665G | Under the same conditions, other cells sensitized with the dyes TP1, TP2 and TP4 also showed attractive performances with Jsc of 14.87, 14.21 and 12.68 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.778, 0.790 and 0.801 V, and FF of 0.666, 0.686 and 0.693, corresponding to the η values of 7.71%, 7.70% and 7.05%, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 64063 |
{
"text": [
"67"
],
"answer_start": [
142
]
} | 10.1039/C5NR05207F | The PCEs of devices based on these doped TiO2 nanorods are higher than those of devices with undoped TiO2 in each study by about 33%, 50% and 67% for Mg, Nb and Sn, respectively.Nanorods would evolve to bendable nanowires with the increase of the ratio between the length and diameter under controllable conditions. | What is ? | 20263 |
{
"text": [
"0.91 V"
],
"answer_start": [
32
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.057 | Notably, the Voc increased from 0.91 V to 0.96 V and from 0.91 V to 0.93 V, respectively, and the FF greatly improved from 66% to more than 75%. | What is the value of Voc? | 147 |
{
"text": [
"23"
],
"answer_start": [
38
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA09661H | 6a) and a power-per-weight as high as 23 W g−1 (Fig. | What is ? | 16890 |
{
"text": [
"8.41%"
],
"answer_start": [
240
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.05.071 | As a result, the bifacial semitransparent PSC has been optimized from optical and electrical aspects, and the efficient triple-layer cathode of PEIE (10 nm)/Ag(11 nm)/MoOx(10 nm) has resulted in the high PCE values of 13.55%at ITO side and 8.41% and Ag film side. | What is the value of PCE? | 5551 |
{
"text": [
"0.59V"
],
"answer_start": [
53
]
} | 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.03.271 | For this device the photovoltaic parameters were VOC=0.59V, the JSC=7.64mA/cm2, FF=50.41%, and the PCE=2.27%. | What is the value of VOC? | 32559 |
{
"text": [
"120s"
],
"answer_start": [
153
]
} | 10.1016/j.renene.2014.06.043 | For front side illuminated devices, the overall device efficiency (η) increases from 1.73% to 2.57% when the Pt sputtering time is increased from 60s to 120s. | What is the value of time? | 30083 |
{
"text": [
"Au"
],
"answer_start": [
54
]
} | 10.1039/C8EE01500G | To finalize the preparation of devices, a 80 nm-thick Au electrode was further deposited on the FTO/cp-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD films.The current (J)–voltage (V) property of the hole-only device (FTO/spiro-MeOTAD/Au) was measured in the dark to obtain the space charge limited current (SCLC). | What is electrode? | 21317 |
{
"text": [
"0.12 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
52
]
} | 10.1039/C7RA03066E | The active area of the devices was determined to be 0.12 cm2 by a shadow mask.UV-vis spectra of the perovskite films on mesoporous TiO2 film were obtained by an UV-vis spectrophotometer (Agilent, model Cary 60). | What is the value of active area? | 16116 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
69
]
} | 10.1016/j.cplett.2014.09.013 | Our research suggests that metal is easily reduced into freestanding TiO2 nanotube arrays by UV irradiation, which has various applications in photovoltaics, photocatalysis, hydrogen generation, sensors, and water-splitting devices.Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at | What is ? | 32885 |
{
"text": [
"0.16 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
34
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.08.041 | The active area of the device was 0.16 cm2, defined by the aperture area of the mask.UV–vis absorption spectra were recorded with a spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Ltd., U-3900). | What is the value of active area? | 8954 |
{
"text": [
"0.82 V"
],
"answer_start": [
293
]
} | 10.1039/C0EE00735H | 1(B)) at an irradiation of 100 mW cm−2AM1.5 simulated sunlight, and the detailed photovoltaic parameters are collected in Table 1.The short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc), open-circuit photovoltage (Voc) and fill factor (FF) of a typical cell with the cobalt electrolyte are 14.1 mA cm−2, 0.82 V and 0.72, respective... | What is the value of Voc? | 74653 |
{
"text": [
"0.71 V"
],
"answer_start": [
306
]
} | 10.1039/B512983D | 1,7-Bis(N-pyrrolidinyl)-N,N′-dicyclohexyl-3,4,9,10-perylenebis(dicarboximide) (5-PDI), which has the electron donating pyrrolidinyl group, absorbed the long wavelength region to give IPCE onset higher than 750 nm and the pyrrolidinyl group also raised the LUMO level of 5-PDI to render the high VOC (up to 0.71 V) in pho... | What is the value of VOC? | 68672 |
{
"text": [
"68 ± 3%"
],
"answer_start": [
436
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.006 | The performance of these MAPbI3 devices is compared and listed in When the MAPbI3 absorber layer was post treated with GUTS/IPA with concentration up to 4 mg/mL, the average power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the solar cells increases by nearly 20%, from 12.7 ± 1.8% to 15.2 ± 0.9%, mainly due to the increase of open-... | What is the value of FF? | 5762 |
{
"text": [
"SnO2"
],
"answer_start": [
315
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.01.040 | Nevertheless, the difference is small and the advantage associated with low-cost graphene derived from local graphite can overweigh the lower performance and hence as far as practical applications are concerned, graphene based ones are more viable than Pt-based ones.Graphene counter electrode based DSCs utilizing SnO2/... | What is ? | 58606 |
{
"text": [
"0.62 V"
],
"answer_start": [
245
]
} | 10.1016/j.poly.2014.04.059 | The DSSC device using the Ru(II) dye with the 9-tolylcarbazole chromophore exhibited the highest power conversion efficiency (η) up to 3.39%, with a short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 8.06 mA cm−2, an open-circuit photovoltage (Voc) of 0.62 V and a high fill factor (ff) of 0.68 under illumination of an AM 1.5 ... | What is the value of Voc? | 30243 |
{
"text": [
"6.34%"
],
"answer_start": [
57
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.12.034 | The DSSCs assembled using N719 dye witnessed higher η of 6.34% than η of 4.3% and 5.2% obtained by was found predominant over the present study which may be due to higher catalytic activity of composite (Fe2O3/Graphene) based counter electrode.The effect of various concentrations of CDA (2.5mM, 5mM, 7.5mM, 10mM and 12... | What is the value of η? | 28435 |
{
"text": [
"6.46mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
35
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.079 | In the case of UY2, the Jsc value (6.46mAcm−2) was higher than that of UY1 under the same condition and the Voc was further improved to 0.50V, corresponding to a η of 2.28%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 26702 |
{
"text": [
"738 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
202
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA00194J | DSSCs fabricated with a 0.01 M Zr/N-doped TiO2 photoelectrode achieved a maximum power conversion efficiency of 12.62% with a short-circuit current (Jsc) of 26.37 mA cm−2, open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 738 mV, and fill factor (FF) of 67.3% after TiCl4 treatment. | What is the value of Voc? | 73707 |
{
"text": [
"4.69%"
],
"answer_start": [
173
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.02.045 | Although hollow spheres absorbed smaller amount of dyes than nanosheets, the former generated a higher Jsc due to the stronger light-scattering effect, but η decreased from 4.69% of hollow spheres to 4.12% of nanosheets. | What is the value of η? | 40953 |
{
"text": [
"8.31%"
],
"answer_start": [
193
]
} | 10.1039/C8RA04091E | The overall energy conversion efficiency of the DSSC with NiCoSe2-150 CE reached 8.76%, and DSSCs with NiCoSe2-120 and NiCoSe2-180 CEs achieved power conversion efficiencies (PCE) of 8.48% and 8.31%, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 71896 |
{
"text": [
"0.99V"
],
"answer_start": [
153
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.130 | From a, we can obtain that the PCE of SAM-unmodified PSC is 11.74% (Jsc=20.30mAcm−2, Voc=0.98V and FF=0.59) under FS, while 14.65% (Jsc=20.55mAcm−2, Voc=0.99V and FF=0.72) under RS. | What is the value of Voc? | 425 |
{
"text": [
"340"
],
"answer_start": [
75
]
} | 10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.10.011 | The device with the hetero-layered structure exhibited a Jsc of as high as 340 μA/cm2 and an energy conversion efficiency of up to 0.33% under blue monochromatic illumination. | What is ? | 9523 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
80
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.01.030 | The higher value of Rs for carbon CE may be due to poor adhesion of the film to FTO substrate.J-V characteristic curves of DSSCs using carbon produced from carbonization of sugar free and Pt counter electrodes are presented in , and the corresponding photovoltaic and electrochemical performance parameters of the cells ... | What is substrate? | 57632 |
{
"text": [
"5.19%"
],
"answer_start": [
70
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.210 | As shown in , the PCE was gradually increased from 3.85% (500 rpm) to 5.19% (3500 rpm). | What is the value of PCE? | 30049 |
{
"text": [
"9.29mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
120
]
} | 10.1016/j.mset.2019.01.001 | The short circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of Au:TiO2 was 15.88mA/cm2, which is improved by 70% correlated to that of 9.29mA/cm2 for pure TiO2 electrode. | What is the value of Jsc? | 48919 |
{
"text": [
"1.09 V"
],
"answer_start": [
152
]
} | 10.1039/C9TA01319A | The Jsc, Voc, FF and PCE are 22.10 mA cm−2, 1.12 V, 81.97% and 20.36% for the champion chlorine doping solar cells with forward scan and 21.11 mA cm−2, 1.09 V, 82.34%, 18.93% for the device without chlorine. | What is the value of Voc? | 20552 |
{
"text": [
"0.74V"
],
"answer_start": [
49
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.10.011 | With GO/Mn (1:10) as the CE, JSC=17.2mA/cm2, VOC=0.74V, FF=0.58, and PCE=7.47%. | What is the value of VOC? | 33265 |
{
"text": [
"16.16%"
],
"answer_start": [
105
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227216 | For the simplest and unoptimised ITO/PEDOT:PSS/CH3NH3PbI3/PC61BM/Ag PSC, the PCE and the FF increased to 16.16% and 0.79 on the glass substrate and to 13.54% and 0.7 on the flexible PET substrate, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 3702 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
164
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA04807F | The high frequency semicircle beginning point was used to estimate the series resistance (Rs) of the interfacial resistance between the electrode materials and the FTO conducting glass substrate. | What is substrate? | 68472 |
{
"text": [
"5.63%"
],
"answer_start": [
308
]
} | 10.1039/B822190A | ChinaReceived (in Cambridge, UK) 10th December 2008 , Accepted 12th February 2009A novel class of organic D–π–A dyes employing a N,N,N′,N′-tetraphenylbenzidine (TPD) unit as donor was designed and synthesized for dye-sensitized solar cells, which achieved a solar-to-electricity conversion efficiency (η) of 5.63% in pre... | What is the value of η? | 71971 |
{
"text": [
"1.46%"
],
"answer_start": [
139
]
} | 10.1016/j.jssc.2012.02.026 | As can be seen, along with the increase of ZnO NAs length, the conversion efficiency (η) was evidently improved (Z1, 0.61%; Z2, 1.00%; Z3, 1.46%). | What is the value of η? | 49379 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
58
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.01.142 | The DSCs were assembled by sandwiching the dye-sensitized TiO2 anodes and various CEs with an electrolyte (1M 1.3-dimethylimidazolium iodine, 0.5M 4-tert-butylpyridine, 0.15M iodine, and 0.1M guanidine thiocyanate in 3-methoxypropionitrile solvent) using a 60μm thick hot-melt Surlyn spacer (Dupont, USA)Fourier transfor... | What is anodes? | 42095 |
{
"text": [
"7.62%"
],
"answer_start": [
66
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.04.048 | As a result, DSSCs based on W10 afford an impressive PCE value of 7.62%, which is around 20% higher than 6.28% for W09 sensitized cells. | What is the value of PCE? | 28136 |
{
"text": [
"2.99%"
],
"answer_start": [
98
]
} | 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.163567 | The back illuminated optimization was achieved with the 11μm TiO2 film thickness which was at PCE=2.99%, Jsc=7.83 mA/cm2, Voc=0.7V, FF=0.55 with the minimum volume of the Pt solution. | What is the value of PCE? | 38428 |
{
"text": [
"10.06 ± 0.14%"
],
"answer_start": [
65
]
} | 10.1039/C4CC10215K | The values of η are 10.03 ± 0.20%, 10.30 ± 0.11%, 10.07 ± 0.13%, 10.06 ± 0.14%, 10.03 ± 0.09%, and 9.84 ± 0.07% for EVA/pyrene/DSSCs with 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.6 wt% pyrene photoluminescent layer contents, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 67609 |
{
"text": [
"752 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
66
]
} | 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.08.062 | The device B with the Jsc,, Voc, FF and η values of 5.11 mA cm−2, 752 mV, 0.518 and 1.99% exhibits higher performance than device A, which can be mainly attributed to the enhanced ability of dye absorption and light harvesting of device B. | What is the value of Voc? | 59533 |
{
"text": [
"12.4%"
],
"answer_start": [
67
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA05352D | The PCE of the PFN-modified solar cells significantly dropped from 12.4% of the reference cell to 8.7% (Fig. | What is the value of PCE? | 16392 |
{
"text": [
"2.03%"
],
"answer_start": [
208
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.08.009 | The PSCs made on the co-modified HTL has a maximum PCE of 5.11%, which shows 293%, 152%, and 38% improvements in contrast to the values of the devices based on the pristine PEDOT:PSS (1.30%), DMSO-PEDOT:PSS (2.03%), and CB-PEDOT:PSS (3.69%) HTL, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 1230 |
{
"text": [
"9.93%"
],
"answer_start": [
168
]
} | 10.1039/C5CS00113G | The improved crystallinity and morphology of the perovskite films fabricated using the NH4Cl additive led to remarkable enhancement in the device performance (a PCE of 9.93% and a FF of 0.8011). | What is the value of PCE? | 21074 |
{
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
384
]
} | 10.1016/j.tsf.2018.07.041 | The whole fabrication process was completed after the thermal evaporation of 10nm BCP and 100nm Ag on top of the PCBM layer under high vacuum of 4×10−4Pa.Photovoltaic performance of the perovskite solar cells was employed on a solar cell testing system consisting of a computer-programmed sourcemeter (Keithley 2400) and... | What is the value of solar? | 466 |
{
"text": [
"7.6%"
],
"answer_start": [
172
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.03.049 | Due to their unique 2-D nanostructure, higher dye loading, retardation in recombination; DSSCs made with photoelectrodes containing TiO2 nanoplates scattering layer showed 7.6% energy conversion efficiency (η), which was much better than the pristine NC-TiO2 photoelectrode (η: 6.7%) and the photoelectrode with commerci... | What is the value of η? | 45087 |
{
"text": [
"1.6%"
],
"answer_start": [
123
]
} | 10.1016/j.optmat.2018.04.059 | Because of the structural constraints, SWCNTs and SnO2 show a low photovoltaic performance; (Jsc=4.1mAcm−2, Voc=0.74V, FF=51.6% and PCE=1.6%) and (Jsc=13.1mAcm−2, Voc=0.52V, FF=32.3% and PCE=2.2%), respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 48945 |
{
"text": [
"21.51mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
138
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.10.037 | The J–V analysis results showed that the when 1% DIO was added to the perovskite layer, the Jsc, FF, and PCE of the PSC were the highest (21.51mA/cm2, 0.65, and 12.86%, respectively). | What is the value of Jsc? | 8609 |
{
"text": [
"19.51%"
],
"answer_start": [
91
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110197 | The resulting power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of the optimized devices are 20.93% and 19.51% for active areas of 0.12cm2 and 0.7cm2, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 6135 |
{
"text": [
"48.72%"
],
"answer_start": [
134
]
} | 10.1016/j.ica.2017.05.056 | The BDNC device displayed an inferior PCE of 7.36%, which resulted from the relatively lower Jsc and FF (Jsc= 16.17 mA cm−2, and FF = 48.72%).b, the external quantum efficiency (EQE) curves were measured in the devices using PC61BM, EDNC, or BDNC as the ETMs. | What is the value of FF? | 5622 |
{
"text": [
"5.01%"
],
"answer_start": [
186
]
} | 10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.05.074 | Under standard global AM 1.5 solar conditions, the HKK-Por1-sensitised cell gave a JSC of 10.7 mAcm−2, VOC of 0.67 V, FF of 0.70, corresponding to, an overall conversion efficiency η of 5.01%. | What is the value of η? | 38448 |
{
"text": [
"0.726 V"
],
"answer_start": [
85
]
} | 10.1039/C7SE00141J | This cell exhibits a good cell performance of 5.70% (Jsc of 11.73 mA cm−2 and Voc of 0.726 V), which is better than the mono-anchored congener.Liu et al. | What is the value of Voc? | 67463 |
{
"text": [
"662 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
238
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2014.09.019 | The DSSC with Ti:Nb(5:5)–TiO2/FTO exhibited a higher PCE of 10.37% [Jsc= 20.82 mA/cm2, Voc= 717 mV, and a fill factor (FF) = 69.5%] than the reference device with Ti:Nb(10:0)–TiO2/FTO, which showed a PCE of 7.90% (Jsc= 18.05 mA/cm2, Voc= 662 mV, and FF= 66.1%). | What is the value of Voc? | 37933 |
{
"text": [
"0.73 V"
],
"answer_start": [
64
]
} | 10.1039/C8NJ01029C | The Voc value for the TPACA-based DSSC decreased from 0.70 V to 0.73 V upon addition of TBP. | What is the value of Voc? | 60806 |
{
"text": [
"15.2%"
],
"answer_start": [
159
]
} | 10.1039/C9TC01741K | In that work, the authors mainly focused on the fabrication of conventional-structure PSCs, and the use of the same FM in the inverted structure led to a PCE (15.2%) lower than that obtained using C60 (15.8%). | What is the value of PCE? | 14751 |
{
"text": [
"0.61V"
],
"answer_start": [
43
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.075 | The VOC, JSC and FF values are obtained as 0.61V, 17.86mA cm−2, and 0.57, respectively. | What is the value of VOC? | 26407 |
{
"text": [
"7.96mA·cm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
98
]
} | 10.1016/j.cjche.2019.03.034 | The cell with polymer blend electrolyte having 40wt% of imidazole shows that Voc is 659mV, Jsc is 7.96mA·cm−2 and η is 3.04%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 54417 |
{
"text": [
"20.31mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
187
]
} | 10.1016/j.mtener.2017.06.003 | With the increasing amount of NH4Cl, the performance of PSCs is improved and the best PCE is obtained with the NH4Cl:PbI2 ratio of 0.75 and shows a high PCE of 16.42% with Voc=1.05V, Jsc=20.31mAcm−2 and FF=77%, respectively. | What is the value of Jsc? | 1454 |
{
"text": [
"(PEA)2(MA)m-1PbmI3"
],
"answer_start": [
388
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.12.047 | Further optimization of the 2D multilayered perovskites toward smaller bandgap and higher mobility, as well as replacement of the hole-accepting materials with ones better matched to perovskite would be necessary for enhanced light absorption and higher conversion efficiencies In summary, by a simple one-step spin coat... | What is perovskite? | 10460 |
{
"text": [
"9%"
],
"answer_start": [
68
]
} | 10.1039/C5CS00113G | By optimizing the FA and MA cation mixing ratio to 3:2, a PCE of 12.9% was achieved with this low-cost fully printable mesoscopic solar cell, which indicated a promising prospect for low-cost photovoltaic technology. | What is the value of PCE? | 21059 |
{
"text": [
"2.63%"
],
"answer_start": [
59
]
} | 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.12.040 | In contrast, the optimized PCEs were measured to be 3.43%, 2.63% and 0.55% for nanosheets composed ZnO, the mixed ZnO, nanopetals composed ZnO, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 47317 |
{
"text": [
"3.16%"
],
"answer_start": [
24
]
} | 10.1039/C6SE00118A | The PCEs of the m-DSCs, 3.16% (Z-907) and 2.92% (MK-2), were lower in comparison with those of the BC-DSCs mainly due to the loss in voltage. | What is the value of PCE? | 64201 |
{
"text": [
"15.3%"
],
"answer_start": [
55
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.083 | The PSC-pristine without CuPc(tBu)4 exhibited a PCE of 15.3% with Voc=1.02V, Jsc=20.0mAcm−2 and FF=75%, while the PSC-CuPc(tBu)4 fabricated with the perovskite layer prepared from the precursor containing the optimal CuPc(tBu)4 concentration achieved an enhanced PCE of 17.3% that can be mainly ascribed to the obviously... | What is the value of PCE? | 3167 |
{
"text": [
"240s"
],
"answer_start": [
136
]
} | 10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.133 | The energy conversion efficiency gradually increased with increasing etching time and obtained a maximum of 7.71% when etching time was 240s. | What is the value of time? | 35254 |
{
"text": [
"7.72%"
],
"answer_start": [
208
]
} | 10.1039/C3CE27098J | Due to the highest scattering effect and the lowest charge transfer resistance (Rct) at TiO2–dye–electrolyte interface, the DSSC with H2 (synthesized with HAc volume of 2 mL) as scattering layer offered η of 7.72%, which is 42% higher than that based on the monolayered NS photoanode.Anisotropy is the intrinsic characte... | What is the value of η? | 72775 |
{
"text": [
"400"
],
"answer_start": [
212
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.135278 | The ionic conductivity of 3.76, 0.47, 0.27, and 0.20μScm−1 were respectively found for the FDSSCs with the TMC photoanode as well as with the TNP/TMC photoanodes prepared using the withdraw rate of 100, 300, and 400mmmin−1 in the dip-coating process, respectively. | What is photoanode? | 44968 |
{
"text": [
"ITO"
],
"answer_start": [
371
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.09.054 | The SnO2-based device gives the lowest Rco value indicating that charge extraction is most efficient at the SnO2/CH3NH3PbI3 interface among all the investigated ECL/CH3NH3PbI3 interfaces, a fact that is consistent with the (T)PL results Electron mobilities of the three devices were then evaluated by the space charge-li... | What is ? | 368 |
{
"text": [
"t-BPTI"
],
"answer_start": [
21
]
} | 10.1039/C8EE02744G | The devices with the t-BPTI/C60 double ETL yielded a maximum efficiency of 11.63%.Apart from the NDI and PDI units, there are other small molecules designed for ETM that show good performance. | What is ETL? | 16701 |
{
"text": [
"3.2%"
],
"answer_start": [
96
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.09.215 | The average PCE exhibits: 1.4% for ml-0, 3.5% for ml-250, 4.2% for ml-410, 4.5% for ml-640, and 3.2% for ml-900. | What is the value of PCE? | 9411 |
{
"text": [
"6.97%"
],
"answer_start": [
102
]
} | 10.1016/j.egyr.2018.01.007 | The corresponding solar light-to-electricity conversion efficiency of new hetero-phase structures, η=∼6.97% with FF=0.6 were obtained. | What is the value of η? | 38007 |
{
"text": [
"4.66 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
41
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.08.124 | A DSSC based on WO3 nanorods showed JSC= 4.66 mA/cm2, VOC= 0.383 V, FF= 0.422, and η= 0.75% (dotted line). | What is the value of JSC? | 37798 |
{
"text": [
"1.06"
],
"answer_start": [
97
]
} | 10.1039/C6NR02276F | The influence of oxygen pressure and NiO film thickness has been studied, and a 17.3% PCE (VOC = 1.06 V, FF = 0.813, JSC = 20.2 mA cm−2) was demonstrated for a nanostructured NiO film with 150 nm thickness. | What is ? | 18879 |
{
"text": [
"73.16%"
],
"answer_start": [
55
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA02522C | A PCE of 6.01% (Jsc = 6.13 mA cm−2, Voc = 1.34 V, FF = 73.16%) is recorded for QDs-free inorganic PSC device, which is comparable to the state-of-the-art all-inorganic CsPbBr3 solar cells free of HTMs. | What is the value of FF? | 17353 |
{
"text": [
"5.22%"
],
"answer_start": [
294
]
} | 10.1039/C2JM30200D | When the solution baths were changed to the mixed solvents with DMF and ethanol, the Voc and ff values of the three dyes increased, and the DSC based on LI-22 still showed better comprehensive properties with Voc of 0.71 V, Jsc of 11.29 mA cm−2, and ff of 0.65, corresponding to the η value of 5.22%. | What is the value of η? | 67816 |
{
"text": [
"4.24%"
],
"answer_start": [
154
]
} | 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.02.004 | Finally, the fabricated DSSC containing Ag/ERGO/FTO CE represented suitable photovoltaic characteristic parameters (Voc= 0.8 V, jsc= 29.04 mA cm−2 and η= 4.24%) under simulated light of AM1.5 G (1000 W m−2) compared to Pt-based DSSC (Voc= 0.66 V, jsc= 19.54 mA cm−2 and η= 6.08%). | What is the value of η? | 55346 |
{
"text": [
"0.742 V"
],
"answer_start": [
89
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA08753D | For electrode 4 (Au–TiO2–Ag), the cell showed that Jsc, Voc, η and FF were 15.2 mA cm−2, 0.742 V, 7.26% and 63.4%. | What is the value of Voc? | 75979 |
{
"text": [
"13.11mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
166
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.07.082 | The cell with Mo0.6Se yields a front efficiency of 8.05% (Jsc=15.71mAcm−2, Voc=0.729, and FF=70.3%), which is much higher than 6.17% from pristine Pt-based DSSC (Jsc=13.11mAcm−2, Voc=0.712, and FF=66.1%). | What is the value of Jsc? | 24740 |
{
"text": [
"74%"
],
"answer_start": [
183
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104099 | The pure MAPbI3 solar cells showed a decent PCE of 14.87% with an open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 1.00V, a short-circuit current density (JSC) of 20.10mAcm−2, and a fill factor (FF) of 74%. | What is the value of FF? | 9723 |
{
"text": [
"YT1"
],
"answer_start": [
246
]
} | 10.1039/C9TA01452G | Moreover, the good uniform thin film of the HTM could also result in a fast charge transport in the PSC devices and thus fast charge collection in the device.In conclusion, two new 9,9-bis(4-methoxyphenyl)-substituted fluorene-based HTMs, termed YT1 and YT3, have been successfully explored for high-performance organic–... | What is HTMs? | 22904 |
{
"text": [
"78%"
],
"answer_start": [
173
]
} | 10.1039/C5EE00120J | 2(c), because its photovoltaic properties were Voc of 1.1 V, Jsc of 20 mA cm−2, FF of 75%, and η of 16.5% for the forward scan, and Voc of 1.1 V, Jsc of 20.1 mA cm−2, FF of 78%, and η of 17.2% in the reverse scan direction under the same measurement conditions. | What is the value of FF? | 14197 |
{
"text": [
"9.34%"
],
"answer_start": [
162
]
} | 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.017 | The open circuit voltage (Voc) was 740 V, the short circuit current density (Jsc) was 17.48 mA cm−2, the fill factor (FF) 0.72, and the energy efficiency (η) was 9.34%, all of which are much better than those by other methods. | What is the value of η? | 52011 |
{
"text": [
"1.417 mA"
],
"answer_start": [
88
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.112191 | Based on the results, the Voc and the Isc were varied from 0.35 to 0.542 V and 0.805 to 1.417 mA, respectively. | What is the value of Isc? | 38275 |
{
"text": [
"10.29%"
],
"answer_start": [
200
]
} | 10.1039/C4MH00236A | Later, Meng and coworkers developed two simple HTMs TPBS and TPBC by introducing electron-donating groups asymmetrically into the N,N,N′,N′-tetraphenyl-benzidine core, and achieved impressive PCEs of 10.29% and 13.10% respectively in TPBS- and TPBC-based devices without any doping.Recently, Sun and coworkers fabricated... | What is the value of PCE? | 13421 |
{
"text": [
"18.05mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
119
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.049 | After the incorporation of the 3D self-branching anatase TiO2 nanorod, the Jsc was dramatically improved from 13.25 to 18.05mA/cm2, and increased by 36% while the high Voc was still maintained, producing an excellent PCE of 9.5%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 1841 |
{
"text": [
"15.7%"
],
"answer_start": [
579
]
} | 10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.160 | The photocurrent density-voltage (J-V) curves of perovskite solar cells with Ti doped MoO2 ((e)) indicate that the Ti doped MoO2 HTM based device has 1.01 V open-circuit voltage (Voc), 20.0 mA/cm2 short-circuit current density (Jsc), 75.9% fill factor (FF), and 15.3% power conversion efficiency (η) for forward scan con... | What is the value of η? | 1955 |
{
"text": [
"5.57%"
],
"answer_start": [
54
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.05.037 | The DSSC devices with pCPPR dye exhibited high PCE of 5.57% with a short-circuit photocurrent density (JSC) of 15.12mA/cm2, an open-circuit photovoltage (VOC) of 0.71V and a fill factor (FF) of 0.52 under simulated AM 1.5G irradiation (100mW/cm2). | What is the value of PCE? | 27504 |
{
"text": [
"11.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
84
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.10.066 | When the black dye was used as sensitizer and I−/I3− as redox electrolyte, the η of 11.1% is obtained It is believed that the photoelectrochemical properties of DSSCs are correlated with the dye adsorption amount, photogenerated electron injection drive force and interface charge transfer rate. | What is the value of η? | 52456 |
{
"text": [
"0.25cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
36
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.133 | The active area of DSSCs was 5×5mm (0.25cm2). | What is the value of active area? | 29177 |
{
"text": [
"61.7%"
],
"answer_start": [
252
]
} | 10.1039/C5EE03620H | As listed in Table 1, the device with a photoactive area of 25 mm2 gives a PCE of 12.9% (Voc = 0.92 V, Jsc = 19.4 mA cm−2 and FF = 72.3%) and the PCE for the device with a photoactive area of 100 mm2 is 10.8% (Voc = 0.93 V, Jsc = 18.9 mA cm−2 and FF = 61.7%), indicating that the quality of the perovskite film does not ... | What is the value of FF? | 17042 |
{
"text": [
"0.15406"
],
"answer_start": [
333
]
} | 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2016.11.004 | Finally, both the electrodes are sandwiched together and small amount of redox electrolyte (Iodolyte HI 30) was injected into the electrodes to complete the cell.Powder X-ray diffraction measurement for the TiO2 NRs was performed on a X′Pert PRO high resolution X-ray diffractometer (PANalytical, Netherlands) with CuKα ... | What is TiO2? | 47838 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.