Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
dataset
stringclasses
12 values
citation_en
stringlengths
1
94
citation2_en
stringclasses
20 values
name_en
stringlengths
5
299
document_date_en
timestamp[us, tz=UTC]date
1993-01-04 00:00:00
2026-04-24 00:00:00
url_en
stringlengths
52
101
scraped_timestamp_en
timestamp[us, tz=UTC]date
2022-08-18 16:36:39
2026-04-25 09:02:15
unofficial_text_en
stringlengths
0
3.33M
citation_fr
stringlengths
6
22
citation2_fr
stringclasses
20 values
name_fr
stringlengths
6
278
document_date_fr
timestamp[us, tz=UTC]date
1998-10-21 00:00:00
2026-04-23 00:00:00
url_fr
stringlengths
54
77
scraped_timestamp_fr
timestamp[us, tz=UTC]date
2022-08-25 20:37:12
2026-04-25 09:02:14
unofficial_text_fr
stringlengths
245
1.14M
upstream_license
stringclasses
7 values
BCCA
2002 BCCA 595
R. v. Jordan
2002-10-21T00:00:00
https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/ca/02/05/2002bcca0595.htm
2026-01-18T11:13:45.580000
2002BCCA0595 Citation: R. v. Jordan Date: 20021021 2002 BCCA 595 Docket: CA028459 COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA ORAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice Esson October 21, 2002 The Honourable Madam Justice Newbury The Honourable Madam Justice Huddart Victoria, B.C. BETWEEN: REGINA RESPONDENT ...
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
See upstream license, including non-commercial use and other restrictions: https://perma.cc/EA5C-R5DK. Note: This is an unofficial reproduction of a British Columbia Court of Appeal decision, without endorsement or affiliation by the British Columbia courts.
BCCA
2002 BCCA 596
R. v. Planes
2002-10-24T00:00:00
https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/ca/02/05/2002bcca0596.htm
2026-01-18T11:13:02.713000
2002BCCA0596 Citation: R. v. Planes Date: 20021024 2002 BCCA 596 Docket: CA028285 COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA ORAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice Esson October 24, 2002 The Honourable Madam Justice Newbury The Honourable Madam Justice Huddart Victoria, B.C. BETWEEN: REGINA RESPONDENT ...
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
See upstream license, including non-commercial use and other restrictions: https://perma.cc/EA5C-R5DK. Note: This is an unofficial reproduction of a British Columbia Court of Appeal decision, without endorsement or affiliation by the British Columbia courts.
BCCA
2002 BCCA 594
R. v. Law
2002-12-13T00:00:00
https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/ca/02/05/2002bcca0594.htm
2026-01-18T11:08:32.961000
2002BCCA0594 Citation: R. v. Law Date: 20021213 2002 BCCA 594 Docket: CA029463 COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA BETWEEN: REGINA RESPONDENT AND: ERIC CAMERON LAW APPELLANT Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice Esson The Honourable Madam Justice Newbury The Honourable Madam Justice Huddart J. Green Counsel for the Appe...
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
See upstream license, including non-commercial use and other restrictions: https://perma.cc/EA5C-R5DK. Note: This is an unofficial reproduction of a British Columbia Court of Appeal decision, without endorsement or affiliation by the British Columbia courts.
BCCA
2002 BCCA 597
Emerson v. I.C.B.C
2002-10-23T00:00:00
https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/ca/02/05/2002bcca0597.htm
2026-01-18T11:13:14.866000
2002BCCA597 Citation: Emerson v. I.C.B.C et al Date: 20021023 2002 BCCA 597 Docket: CA026785 COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA ORAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice Esson October 23, 2002 The Honourable Madam Justice Newbury The Honourable Madam Justice Huddart Victoria, B.C. BETWEEN: KIM EME...
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
See upstream license, including non-commercial use and other restrictions: https://perma.cc/EA5C-R5DK. Note: This is an unofficial reproduction of a British Columbia Court of Appeal decision, without endorsement or affiliation by the British Columbia courts.
BCCA
2002 BCCA 598
Marren v. Echo Bay Mines Ltd.
2002-10-30T00:00:00
https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/ca/02/05/2002bcca0598.htm
2026-01-18T11:12:36.080000
2002BCCA0598 Citation: Marren and Brown v. Echo Bay Date: 20021030 2002 BCCA 598 Docket: CA030088 COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA BETWEEN: MARK MARREN and JOHN BROWN RESPONDENTS (PLAINTIFF) AND: ECHO BAY MINES LTD APPELLANT (DEFENDANT) Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice Smith (In Chambers) C.J. Overholt J. Dhaliw...
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
See upstream license, including non-commercial use and other restrictions: https://perma.cc/EA5C-R5DK. Note: This is an unofficial reproduction of a British Columbia Court of Appeal decision, without endorsement or affiliation by the British Columbia courts.
BCCA
2002 BCCA 599
R. v. D.R. (YO)
2002-10-28T00:00:00
https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/ca/02/05/2002bcca0599.htm
2026-01-18T11:12:51.087000
2002BCCA0599 Citation: R. v. D.R. (YO) Date: 20021028 2002 BCCA 599 Docket: CA030060 Registry: Vancouver COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA ORAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT Before: The Honourable Madam Justice Ryan October 28, 2002 The Honourable Mr. Justice Mackenzie The Honourable Mr. Justice Thackray Vancouver, B.C. BET...
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
See upstream license, including non-commercial use and other restrictions: https://perma.cc/EA5C-R5DK. Note: This is an unofficial reproduction of a British Columbia Court of Appeal decision, without endorsement or affiliation by the British Columbia courts.
BCCA
2002 BCCA 593
Tjader v. Tjader
2002-10-30T00:00:00
https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/ca/02/05/2002bcca0593.htm
2026-01-18T11:12:33.865000
2002BCCA0593 Citation: Tjader v. Tjader Date: 20021030 2002 BCCA 593 Docket: CA029940 COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA BETWEEN: LINDA JEAN TJADER RESPONDENT (Plaintiff) AND: EARL BRYAN TJADER APPELLANT (Defendant) Before: The Honourable Mr.Justice Hall (In Chambers) S.C. Jones Counsel for the Appellant R. Vogel & ...
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
See upstream license, including non-commercial use and other restrictions: https://perma.cc/EA5C-R5DK. Note: This is an unofficial reproduction of a British Columbia Court of Appeal decision, without endorsement or affiliation by the British Columbia courts.
BCCA
2022 BCCA 66
Beaudoin v. British Columbia (Attorney General)
2022-02-11T00:00:00
https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/ca/22/00/2022BCCA0066.htm
2026-01-18T03:39:15.489000
2022 BCCA 66 Beaudoin v. British Columbia (Attorney General) COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Beaudoin v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2022 BCCA 66 Date: 20220211 Docket: CA47363 Between: Alain Beaudoin, Brent Smith, John Koopman, John Van Muyen, Riverside Calvary Chapel, Immanuel Covenant Reform...
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
See upstream license, including non-commercial use and other restrictions: https://perma.cc/EA5C-R5DK. Note: This is an unofficial reproduction of a British Columbia Court of Appeal decision, without endorsement or affiliation by the British Columbia courts.
BCCA
2002 BCCA 591
Rubysea Investments Ltd. v. Montalban
2002-10-30T00:00:00
https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/ca/02/05/2002bcca0591.htm
2026-01-18T11:12:31.489000
2002BCCA0591 Citation: Rubysea Investments Ltd. v. Montalban Date: 20021030 2002 BCCA 591 Docket: CA027757 Registry: Vancouver COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA BETWEEN: RUBYSEA INVESTMENTS LTD. AND PETER ANDREW ALLARD APPELLANTS (PLAINTIFFS) AND: SHANE MONTALBAN AND JAMES BAROUX RESPONDENTS (DEFENDANTS) Before: Th...
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
See upstream license, including non-commercial use and other restrictions: https://perma.cc/EA5C-R5DK. Note: This is an unofficial reproduction of a British Columbia Court of Appeal decision, without endorsement or affiliation by the British Columbia courts.
BCCA
2002 BCCA 590
Vinderskov v. Vinderskov
2002-10-29T00:00:00
https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/ca/02/05/2002bcca0590.htm
2026-01-18T11:12:38.392000
2002BCCA0590 Citation: Vinderskov v. Vinderskov Date: 20021029 2002 BCCA 590 Docket: CA28827 Registry: Vancouver COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA BETWEEN: PETER MICHAEL VINDERSKOV RESPONDENT (PLAINTIFF) AND: MARIE PIERRETTE VINDERSKOV APPELLANT (DEFENDANT) Before: The Honourable Chief Justice Finch The Honourable ...
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
See upstream license, including non-commercial use and other restrictions: https://perma.cc/EA5C-R5DK. Note: This is an unofficial reproduction of a British Columbia Court of Appeal decision, without endorsement or affiliation by the British Columbia courts.
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

A2AJ Canadian Case Law

Last updated: 2026-04-26 Maintainer: Access to Algorithmic Justice (A2AJ)


Dataset Summary

The A2AJ Canadian Case Law dataset provides bulk, open-access full-text decisions from Canadian courts and tribunals. Each row corresponds to a single case and contains the English and French versions of the decision where both are publicly available. The project builds on an earlier version that was maintained by the Refugee Law Lab (RLL) and is now maintained by A2AJ, a research project co-hosted by York University's Osgoode Hall Law School and Toronto Metropolitan University's Lincoln Alexander School of Law. The dataset is intended to support empirical legal research, legal-tech prototyping, and language-model pre-training in the public interest—especially work that advances access to justice for marginalised and low-income communities.


Dataset Structure (~ 209k cases)

Code Court / Tribunal / Reporter First document - Last document Rows
SCC Supreme Court of Canada 1877-01-15 – 2026-04-24 10,874
FCA Federal Court of Appeal 2001-02-01 – 2026-04-23 7,742
FC Federal Court 2001-02-01 – 2026-04-24 35,384
TCC Tax Court of Canada 2003-01-21 – 2026-04-15 8,042
CMAC Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada 2001-01-19 – 2026-03-25 152
CHRT Canadian Human Rights Tribunal 2003-01-10 – 2026-04-09 1,123
SST Social Security Tribunal of Canada 2013-03-08 – 2026-03-27 17,622
RPD Refugee Protection Division (IRB) 2002-07-16 – 2020-12-14 6,729
RAD Refugee Appeal Division (IRB) 2013-02-19 – 2025-08-11 14,122
RLLR Refugee Law Lab Reporter (RPD, IRB) 2019-01-07 – 2024-12-13 927
BCCA British Columbia Court of Appeal 1999-01-04 – 2026-04-24 14,479
BCSC British Columbia Supreme Court 2000-01-04 – 2026-04-23 50,919
NSCA Nova Scotia Court of Appeal 1993-01-04 – 2026-04-21 4,713
NSSC Nova Scotia Supreme Court 2001-01-04 – 2026-04-24 9,107
NSPC Nova Scotia Provincial Court 2001-01-15 – 2026-04-24 1,593
NSFC Nova Scotia Family Court 2001-02-02 – 2023-11-06 323
NSSM Nova Scotia Small Claims Court 2001-08-30 – 2026-03-20 1,648
ONCA Ontario Court of Appeal 1998-06-08 – 2026-04-24 23,772
YKCA Yukon Court of Appeal 2000-05-15 – 2026-01-19 269

Note: Counts are approximate and will drift as the dataset is updated.

Data Fields

Field Type Description
dataset string Abbreviation identifying the court/tribunal (see above)
citation_en / citation_fr string Neutral citation in English / French
citation2_en / citation2_fr string Secondary citation(s) where available
name_en / name_fr string Style of cause
document_date_en / document_date_fr datetime64[ns, UTC] Decision date
url_en / url_fr string Source URL for the official online version
scraped_timestamp_en / scraped_timestamp_fr datetime64[ns, UTC] Timestamp when the page was scraped
unofficial_text_en / unofficial_text_fr string Full unofficial text of the decision
upstream_license string License terms from the source court/tribunal

Missing values are represented as empty strings ("") or NaN.

Data Languages

Where availble, rows include both English and French texts. Where only one language is published, the fields for the other language are empty.

Data Splits

All rows are provided in a single train split.


Data Loading

from datasets import load_dataset
import pandas as pd

# load decisions for a specific court / tribunal (e.g. Supreme Court of Canada)
cases = load_dataset("a2aj/canadian-case-law", data_dir = "SCC", split="train")

## ALTERNATIVELY
## load the entire corpus
# cases = load_dataset("a2aj/canadian-case-law", split="train")

# covert to df
df = cases.to_pandas()
df.head(5)

The dataset is also offered in Parquet format for fast local use. Files are in subfolders with the court/tribunal names.


Dataset Creation

Curation Rationale

Building on the RLL's earlier bulk-data programme, A2AJ is collecting and sharing Canadian legal data to:

  • democratise access to Canadian jurisprudence;
  • enable large-scale empirical legal studies; and
  • support responsible AI development for the justice sector.

We scrape data only where we are permitted to do so by terms of service of websites that host the data. We also obtain some additional data directly from courts and tribunals.

Source Data & Normalisation

Cases are scraped directly from the official websites of the respective courts and tribunals, or is obtained directly from the tribunals through email or other distruction processes. Where possible, text is stored verbatim with minimal normalisation (e.g. HTML → plain text, whitespace cleanup).

Personal & Sensitive Information

Court and tribunal decisions can contain sensitive personal information. Although all documents are already public, easy bulk access increases privacy risk—particularly for refugees, criminal-justice-involved persons and other marginalised groups. Users who reproduce the data from this dataset are responsible for complying with relevant privacy laws, as well as other laws relating to disseminating information such as publication bans.

Non-Official Versions & Disclaimer

The texts here are unofficial copies. For authoritative versions, consult the URLs in url_en / url_fr.

Non-Affiliation / Endorsement

A2AJ and the production of this dataset are not affiliated with, nor endorsed by, the Government of Canada, provincial courts, or the listed tribunals.


Considerations for Using the Data

  • Social Impact. Open legal data can reduce information asymmetries but also facilitate surveillance or discriminatory profiling. We encourage downstream users to collaborate with community organisations and ensure that derivative tools advance—rather than undermine—access to justice.
  • Bias & Representativeness. Published decisions are not a random sample of disputes. For example, positive administrative decisions are less likely to be appealed and thus under-represented in court records. Models trained on this corpus may therefore skew negative.
  • Limitations. The dataset excludes annexes, schedules and appendices that are sometimes attached as separate PDFs. Long historical gaps exist for some courts (e.g. ONCA pre-1990).

Licensing Information

The code used to create the dataset by the A2AJ and any work on the dataset undertaken by the A2AJ is subject to an open source MIT license.

Users must also comply with upstream licenses found in the upstream_license field in the dataset for each document, which reflects the licenses through which the A2AJ obtained the document. These upstream licenses may include limits on commercial use, as well as other limitations.

The A2AJ is committed to open source methodologies, and we are actively working to obtain more permissive licenses for this data.


Warranties / Representations

While we make best efforts to ensure the completeness and accuracy of the dataset, we provide no warranties regarding completeness or accuracy. The data were collected through automated processes and may contain errors. Always verify data against the official source.


Dataset Curators


Citation

Sean Rehaag & Simon Wallace, "A2AJ Canadian Case Law" (2025), online: Hugging Face Datasets https://huggingface.co/datasets/a2aj/canadian-case-law (updated 2026).


Acknowledgements

This research output is supported in part by funding from the Law Foundation of Ontario and the Social Scienes and Humanities Research Council of Canada, by in-kind compute from the Digital Research Alliance of Canada and by adminstrative support from the Centre for Refugee Studies, the Refugee Law Lab, and Osgoode Hall Law School. We also thank the Canadian judiciary and tribunal staff who publish decisions in open formats.

Downloads last month
891