dataset stringclasses 12
values | citation_en stringlengths 1 94 ⌀ | citation2_en stringclasses 20
values | name_en stringlengths 5 299 ⌀ | document_date_en timestamp[us, tz=UTC]date 1993-01-04 00:00:00 2026-04-24 00:00:00 ⌀ | url_en stringlengths 52 101 ⌀ | scraped_timestamp_en timestamp[us, tz=UTC]date 2022-08-18 16:36:39 2026-04-25 09:02:15 ⌀ | unofficial_text_en stringlengths 0 3.33M ⌀ | citation_fr stringlengths 6 22 ⌀ | citation2_fr stringclasses 20
values | name_fr stringlengths 6 278 ⌀ | document_date_fr timestamp[us, tz=UTC]date 1998-10-21 00:00:00 2026-04-23 00:00:00 ⌀ | url_fr stringlengths 54 77 ⌀ | scraped_timestamp_fr timestamp[us, tz=UTC]date 2022-08-25 20:37:12 2026-04-25 09:02:14 ⌀ | unofficial_text_fr stringlengths 245 1.14M ⌀ | upstream_license stringclasses 7
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCCA | 2002 BCCA 595 | R. v. Jordan | 2002-10-21T00:00:00 | https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/ca/02/05/2002bcca0595.htm | 2026-01-18T11:13:45.580000 |
2002BCCA0595
Citation:
R. v. Jordan
Date: 20021021
2002 BCCA 595
Docket:
CA028459
COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA
ORAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Before:
The Honourable Mr. Justice Esson
October 21, 2002
The Honourable Madam Justice Newbury
The Honourable Madam Justice Huddart
Victoria, B.C.
BETWEEN:
REGINA
RESPONDENT
... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | See upstream license, including non-commercial use and other restrictions: https://perma.cc/EA5C-R5DK. Note: This is an unofficial reproduction of a British Columbia Court of Appeal decision, without endorsement or affiliation by the British Columbia courts. | |
BCCA | 2002 BCCA 596 | R. v. Planes | 2002-10-24T00:00:00 | https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/ca/02/05/2002bcca0596.htm | 2026-01-18T11:13:02.713000 |
2002BCCA0596
Citation:
R. v. Planes
Date: 20021024
2002 BCCA 596
Docket:
CA028285
COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA
ORAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Before:
The Honourable Mr. Justice Esson
October 24, 2002
The Honourable Madam Justice Newbury
The Honourable Madam Justice Huddart
Victoria, B.C.
BETWEEN:
REGINA
RESPONDENT
... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | See upstream license, including non-commercial use and other restrictions: https://perma.cc/EA5C-R5DK. Note: This is an unofficial reproduction of a British Columbia Court of Appeal decision, without endorsement or affiliation by the British Columbia courts. | |
BCCA | 2002 BCCA 594 | R. v. Law | 2002-12-13T00:00:00 | https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/ca/02/05/2002bcca0594.htm | 2026-01-18T11:08:32.961000 |
2002BCCA0594
Citation:
R. v. Law
Date: 20021213
2002 BCCA 594
Docket:
CA029463
COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA
BETWEEN:
REGINA
RESPONDENT
AND:
ERIC CAMERON LAW
APPELLANT
Before:
The Honourable Mr. Justice Esson
The Honourable Madam Justice Newbury
The Honourable Madam Justice Huddart
J. Green
Counsel for the Appe... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | See upstream license, including non-commercial use and other restrictions: https://perma.cc/EA5C-R5DK. Note: This is an unofficial reproduction of a British Columbia Court of Appeal decision, without endorsement or affiliation by the British Columbia courts. | |
BCCA | 2002 BCCA 597 | Emerson v. I.C.B.C | 2002-10-23T00:00:00 | https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/ca/02/05/2002bcca0597.htm | 2026-01-18T11:13:14.866000 |
2002BCCA597
Citation:
Emerson v. I.C.B.C et al
Date: 20021023
2002 BCCA 597
Docket: CA026785
COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA
ORAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Before:
The Honourable Mr. Justice Esson
October 23, 2002
The Honourable Madam Justice Newbury
The Honourable Madam Justice Huddart
Victoria, B.C.
BETWEEN:
KIM EME... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | See upstream license, including non-commercial use and other restrictions: https://perma.cc/EA5C-R5DK. Note: This is an unofficial reproduction of a British Columbia Court of Appeal decision, without endorsement or affiliation by the British Columbia courts. | |
BCCA | 2002 BCCA 598 | Marren v. Echo Bay Mines Ltd. | 2002-10-30T00:00:00 | https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/ca/02/05/2002bcca0598.htm | 2026-01-18T11:12:36.080000 |
2002BCCA0598
Citation:
Marren and Brown v. Echo Bay
Date: 20021030
2002 BCCA 598
Docket: CA030088
COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA
BETWEEN:
MARK MARREN and JOHN BROWN
RESPONDENTS
(PLAINTIFF)
AND:
ECHO BAY MINES LTD
APPELLANT
(DEFENDANT)
Before:
The Honourable Mr. Justice Smith
(In Chambers)
C.J. Overholt
J. Dhaliw... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | See upstream license, including non-commercial use and other restrictions: https://perma.cc/EA5C-R5DK. Note: This is an unofficial reproduction of a British Columbia Court of Appeal decision, without endorsement or affiliation by the British Columbia courts. | |
BCCA | 2002 BCCA 599 | R. v. D.R. (YO) | 2002-10-28T00:00:00 | https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/ca/02/05/2002bcca0599.htm | 2026-01-18T11:12:51.087000 |
2002BCCA0599
Citation:
R. v. D.R. (YO)
Date: 20021028
2002 BCCA 599
Docket:
CA030060
Registry: Vancouver
COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA
ORAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Before:
The Honourable Madam Justice Ryan
October 28, 2002
The Honourable Mr. Justice Mackenzie
The Honourable Mr. Justice Thackray
Vancouver, B.C.
BET... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | See upstream license, including non-commercial use and other restrictions: https://perma.cc/EA5C-R5DK. Note: This is an unofficial reproduction of a British Columbia Court of Appeal decision, without endorsement or affiliation by the British Columbia courts. | |
BCCA | 2002 BCCA 593 | Tjader v. Tjader | 2002-10-30T00:00:00 | https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/ca/02/05/2002bcca0593.htm | 2026-01-18T11:12:33.865000 |
2002BCCA0593
Citation:
Tjader v. Tjader
Date: 20021030
2002 BCCA 593
Docket:
CA029940
COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA
BETWEEN:
LINDA JEAN TJADER
RESPONDENT
(Plaintiff)
AND:
EARL BRYAN TJADER
APPELLANT
(Defendant)
Before:
The Honourable Mr.Justice Hall
(In Chambers)
S.C. Jones
Counsel for the Appellant
R. Vogel & ... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | See upstream license, including non-commercial use and other restrictions: https://perma.cc/EA5C-R5DK. Note: This is an unofficial reproduction of a British Columbia Court of Appeal decision, without endorsement or affiliation by the British Columbia courts. | |
BCCA | 2022 BCCA 66 | Beaudoin v. British Columbia (Attorney General) | 2022-02-11T00:00:00 | https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/ca/22/00/2022BCCA0066.htm | 2026-01-18T03:39:15.489000 |
2022 BCCA 66 Beaudoin v. British Columbia (Attorney General)
COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA
Citation:
Beaudoin v. British Columbia (Attorney General),
2022 BCCA 66
Date: 20220211
Docket: CA47363
Between:
Alain Beaudoin, Brent Smith, John Koopman, John Van Muyen, Riverside Calvary Chapel, Immanuel Covenant Reform... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | See upstream license, including non-commercial use and other restrictions: https://perma.cc/EA5C-R5DK. Note: This is an unofficial reproduction of a British Columbia Court of Appeal decision, without endorsement or affiliation by the British Columbia courts. | |
BCCA | 2002 BCCA 591 | Rubysea Investments Ltd. v. Montalban | 2002-10-30T00:00:00 | https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/ca/02/05/2002bcca0591.htm | 2026-01-18T11:12:31.489000 |
2002BCCA0591
Citation:
Rubysea Investments Ltd. v. Montalban
Date: 20021030
2002 BCCA 591
Docket:
CA027757
Registry: Vancouver
COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA
BETWEEN:
RUBYSEA INVESTMENTS LTD. AND PETER ANDREW ALLARD
APPELLANTS
(PLAINTIFFS)
AND:
SHANE MONTALBAN AND JAMES BAROUX
RESPONDENTS
(DEFENDANTS)
Before:
Th... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | See upstream license, including non-commercial use and other restrictions: https://perma.cc/EA5C-R5DK. Note: This is an unofficial reproduction of a British Columbia Court of Appeal decision, without endorsement or affiliation by the British Columbia courts. | |
BCCA | 2002 BCCA 590 | Vinderskov v. Vinderskov | 2002-10-29T00:00:00 | https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/ca/02/05/2002bcca0590.htm | 2026-01-18T11:12:38.392000 |
2002BCCA0590
Citation:
Vinderskov v. Vinderskov
Date: 20021029
2002 BCCA 590
Docket:
CA28827
Registry: Vancouver
COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA
BETWEEN:
PETER MICHAEL VINDERSKOV
RESPONDENT
(PLAINTIFF)
AND:
MARIE PIERRETTE VINDERSKOV
APPELLANT
(DEFENDANT)
Before:
The Honourable Chief Justice Finch
The Honourable ... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | See upstream license, including non-commercial use and other restrictions: https://perma.cc/EA5C-R5DK. Note: This is an unofficial reproduction of a British Columbia Court of Appeal decision, without endorsement or affiliation by the British Columbia courts. |
A2AJ Canadian Case Law
Last updated: 2026-04-26 Maintainer: Access to Algorithmic Justice (A2AJ)
Dataset Summary
The A2AJ Canadian Case Law dataset provides bulk, open-access full-text decisions from Canadian courts and tribunals. Each row corresponds to a single case and contains the English and French versions of the decision where both are publicly available. The project builds on an earlier version that was maintained by the Refugee Law Lab (RLL) and is now maintained by A2AJ, a research project co-hosted by York University's Osgoode Hall Law School and Toronto Metropolitan University's Lincoln Alexander School of Law. The dataset is intended to support empirical legal research, legal-tech prototyping, and language-model pre-training in the public interest—especially work that advances access to justice for marginalised and low-income communities.
Dataset Structure (~ 209k cases)
| Code | Court / Tribunal / Reporter | First document - Last document | Rows |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCC | Supreme Court of Canada | 1877-01-15 – 2026-04-24 | 10,874 |
| FCA | Federal Court of Appeal | 2001-02-01 – 2026-04-23 | 7,742 |
| FC | Federal Court | 2001-02-01 – 2026-04-24 | 35,384 |
| TCC | Tax Court of Canada | 2003-01-21 – 2026-04-15 | 8,042 |
| CMAC | Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada | 2001-01-19 – 2026-03-25 | 152 |
| CHRT | Canadian Human Rights Tribunal | 2003-01-10 – 2026-04-09 | 1,123 |
| SST | Social Security Tribunal of Canada | 2013-03-08 – 2026-03-27 | 17,622 |
| RPD | Refugee Protection Division (IRB) | 2002-07-16 – 2020-12-14 | 6,729 |
| RAD | Refugee Appeal Division (IRB) | 2013-02-19 – 2025-08-11 | 14,122 |
| RLLR | Refugee Law Lab Reporter (RPD, IRB) | 2019-01-07 – 2024-12-13 | 927 |
| BCCA | British Columbia Court of Appeal | 1999-01-04 – 2026-04-24 | 14,479 |
| BCSC | British Columbia Supreme Court | 2000-01-04 – 2026-04-23 | 50,919 |
| NSCA | Nova Scotia Court of Appeal | 1993-01-04 – 2026-04-21 | 4,713 |
| NSSC | Nova Scotia Supreme Court | 2001-01-04 – 2026-04-24 | 9,107 |
| NSPC | Nova Scotia Provincial Court | 2001-01-15 – 2026-04-24 | 1,593 |
| NSFC | Nova Scotia Family Court | 2001-02-02 – 2023-11-06 | 323 |
| NSSM | Nova Scotia Small Claims Court | 2001-08-30 – 2026-03-20 | 1,648 |
| ONCA | Ontario Court of Appeal | 1998-06-08 – 2026-04-24 | 23,772 |
| YKCA | Yukon Court of Appeal | 2000-05-15 – 2026-01-19 | 269 |
Note: Counts are approximate and will drift as the dataset is updated.
Data Fields
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
dataset |
string |
Abbreviation identifying the court/tribunal (see above) |
citation_en / citation_fr |
string |
Neutral citation in English / French |
citation2_en / citation2_fr |
string |
Secondary citation(s) where available |
name_en / name_fr |
string |
Style of cause |
document_date_en / document_date_fr |
datetime64[ns, UTC] |
Decision date |
url_en / url_fr |
string |
Source URL for the official online version |
scraped_timestamp_en / scraped_timestamp_fr |
datetime64[ns, UTC] |
Timestamp when the page was scraped |
unofficial_text_en / unofficial_text_fr |
string |
Full unofficial text of the decision |
upstream_license |
string |
License terms from the source court/tribunal |
Missing values are represented as empty strings ("") or NaN.
Data Languages
Where availble, rows include both English and French texts. Where only one language is published, the fields for the other language are empty.
Data Splits
All rows are provided in a single train split.
Data Loading
from datasets import load_dataset
import pandas as pd
# load decisions for a specific court / tribunal (e.g. Supreme Court of Canada)
cases = load_dataset("a2aj/canadian-case-law", data_dir = "SCC", split="train")
## ALTERNATIVELY
## load the entire corpus
# cases = load_dataset("a2aj/canadian-case-law", split="train")
# covert to df
df = cases.to_pandas()
df.head(5)
The dataset is also offered in Parquet format for fast local use. Files are in subfolders with the court/tribunal names.
Dataset Creation
Curation Rationale
Building on the RLL's earlier bulk-data programme, A2AJ is collecting and sharing Canadian legal data to:
- democratise access to Canadian jurisprudence;
- enable large-scale empirical legal studies; and
- support responsible AI development for the justice sector.
We scrape data only where we are permitted to do so by terms of service of websites that host the data. We also obtain some additional data directly from courts and tribunals.
Source Data & Normalisation
Cases are scraped directly from the official websites of the respective courts and tribunals, or is obtained directly from the tribunals through email or other distruction processes. Where possible, text is stored verbatim with minimal normalisation (e.g. HTML → plain text, whitespace cleanup).
Personal & Sensitive Information
Court and tribunal decisions can contain sensitive personal information. Although all documents are already public, easy bulk access increases privacy risk—particularly for refugees, criminal-justice-involved persons and other marginalised groups. Users who reproduce the data from this dataset are responsible for complying with relevant privacy laws, as well as other laws relating to disseminating information such as publication bans.
Non-Official Versions & Disclaimer
The texts here are unofficial copies. For authoritative versions, consult the URLs in url_en / url_fr.
Non-Affiliation / Endorsement
A2AJ and the production of this dataset are not affiliated with, nor endorsed by, the Government of Canada, provincial courts, or the listed tribunals.
Considerations for Using the Data
- Social Impact. Open legal data can reduce information asymmetries but also facilitate surveillance or discriminatory profiling. We encourage downstream users to collaborate with community organisations and ensure that derivative tools advance—rather than undermine—access to justice.
- Bias & Representativeness. Published decisions are not a random sample of disputes. For example, positive administrative decisions are less likely to be appealed and thus under-represented in court records. Models trained on this corpus may therefore skew negative.
- Limitations. The dataset excludes annexes, schedules and appendices that are sometimes attached as separate PDFs. Long historical gaps exist for some courts (e.g. ONCA pre-1990).
Licensing Information
The code used to create the dataset by the A2AJ and any work on the dataset undertaken by the A2AJ is subject to an open source MIT license.
Users must also comply with upstream licenses found in the upstream_license field in the dataset for each document, which reflects the licenses through which the A2AJ obtained the document. These upstream licenses may include limits on commercial use, as well as other limitations.
The A2AJ is committed to open source methodologies, and we are actively working to obtain more permissive licenses for this data.
Warranties / Representations
While we make best efforts to ensure the completeness and accuracy of the dataset, we provide no warranties regarding completeness or accuracy. The data were collected through automated processes and may contain errors. Always verify data against the official source.
Dataset Curators
- Sean Rehaag - Co-Diretor, A2AJ
- Simon Wallace - Co-Director, A2AJ
- Contact: a2aj@yorku.ca
Citation
Sean Rehaag & Simon Wallace, "A2AJ Canadian Case Law" (2025), online: Hugging Face Datasets https://huggingface.co/datasets/a2aj/canadian-case-law (updated 2026).
Acknowledgements
This research output is supported in part by funding from the Law Foundation of Ontario and the Social Scienes and Humanities Research Council of Canada, by in-kind compute from the Digital Research Alliance of Canada and by adminstrative support from the Centre for Refugee Studies, the Refugee Law Lab, and Osgoode Hall Law School. We also thank the Canadian judiciary and tribunal staff who publish decisions in open formats.
- Downloads last month
- 891